debian-policy  

Messages by Date

• 2002/10/19 build-deps non non-US does not implies archiving in non-US? Francesco Paolo Lovergine
• 2002/10/18 Bug#165063: debian-policy: Section `12.8.3 Packages providing a terminal emulator' fails to sufficently document the -e option Branden Robinson
• 2002/10/17 Bug#165063: debian-policy: Section `12.8.3 Packages providing a terminal emulator' fails to sufficently document the -e option Clint Adams
• 2002/10/17 Bug#165063: debian-policy: Section `12.8.3 Packages providing a terminal emulator' fails to sufficently document the -e option Branden Robinson
• 2002/10/17 Bug#165063: debian-policy: Section `12.8.3 Packages providing a terminal emulator' fails to sufficently document the -e option Jonathan Amery
• 2002/10/16 Bug#165063: debian-policy: Section `12.8.3 Packages providing a terminal emulator' fails to sufficently document the -e option Branden Robinson
• 2002/10/16 Bug#165063: debian-policy: Section `12.8.3 Packages providing a terminal emulator' fails to sufficently document the -e option Jonathan David Amery
• 2002/10/15 Processed: Change Severity Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/10/15 GUADAGNARE DAVVERO ,LEGGI E CAPIRAI !!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/10/15 GUADAGNARE DAVVERO, LEGGI E CAPIRAI!!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/10/14 Bug#164755: debian-policy: mangled color sequences in fhs.txt Colin Watson
• 2002/10/14 Processed: Apps/Science menu section Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/10/14 Bug#164755: debian-policy: mangled color sequences in fhs.txt Matej Vela
• 2002/10/14 GUADAGNARE DAVVERO, LEGGI E CAPIRAI !!!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/10/14 Promoting your website with bulk-email jnhjTim Thornton
• 2002/10/12 per lui, per lei, per gay pingalfr
• 2002/10/12 Processed: stuff Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/10/12 Processed: stuff Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/10/11 GUADAGNARE DAVVERO, LEGGI E CAPIRAI !!!!!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/10/10 Vagas abertas Paulo
• 2002/10/09 Bug#164035: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] build-dependencies should be satisfied during the clean target Chris Waters
• 2002/10/09 Bug#164035: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] build-dependencies should be satisfied during the clean target Branden Robinson
• 2002/10/09 Bug#164035: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] build-dependencies should be satisfied during the clean target Andrew Suffield
• 2002/10/09 Funziona Davvero!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/10/09 Dear friends, never miss the chance to travel in China, the beautiful and mysterious place to be! holidaycn2002
• 2002/10/08 Vagas abertas Paulo
• 2002/10/08 Bug#23661: Linux Mandrake 9.0 and Red Hat 8.0 are here!!! Customer Support
• 2002/10/07 Bug#163666: debian-policy: Unclear result with [arch] and | Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek
• 2002/10/07 debian-lint-maint, new mailing list for Debian lint tools Josip Rodin
• 2002/10/05 Road Accident Motor Safety Group
• 2002/10/05 BETOSAAD14.444DEPUTADO ESTADUAL Beto Saad
• 2002/10/05 Bom te ver Darcy Gomes Ferreira
• 2002/10/03 unsubscribe MC Yi
• 2002/10/03 Re: TrueType fonts, Type1 fonts, X, and the FHS Eric Sharkey
• 2002/10/03 Re: TrueType fonts, Type1 fonts, X, and the FHS Julian Gilbey
• 2002/10/03 Processed: Re: Bug#163142: www.debian.org: menu policy is incomplete Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/10/03 Re: Bug#163142: www.debian.org: menu policy is incomplete Josip Rodin
• 2002/10/03 Funziona davvero!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/10/01 Bug#89867: Images should be available to all Bill Wohler
• 2002/09/30 Bug#162812: [PROPOSAL] Apps/Science menu section Aaron M. Ucko
• 2002/09/30 Bug#162812: [PROPOSAL] Apps/Science menu section Josip Rodin
• 2002/09/29 Bug#162812: [PROPOSAL] Apps/Science menu section Matej Vela
• 2002/09/28 /bin/sh alternative (was Re: Essentialness of awk) Chris Waters
• 2002/09/28 Re: Essentialness of awk Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/28 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/09/28 Re: Essentialness of awk Santiago Vila
• 2002/09/28 Re: Essentialness of awk Santiago Vila
• 2002/09/27 Re: Essentialness of awk Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/27 Re: Essentialness of awk Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/27 Re: Essentialness of awk Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/27 Re: Essentialness of awk Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/09/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Joey Hess
• 2002/09/27 Re: Essentialness of awk Joey Hess
• 2002/09/27 Re: Essentialness of awk Santiago Vila
• 2002/09/27 Re: Essentialness of awk Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/09/27 (ad)Strong WebRobot/eMailId Collector: Free Download ! herald
• 2002/09/27 Essentialness of awk Santiago Vila
• 2002/09/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/09/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Andreas Schuldei
• 2002/09/27 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Andreas Schuldei
• 2002/09/26 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Chris Waters
• 2002/09/26 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Brendan O'Dea
• 2002/09/26 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/09/26 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Julian Gilbey
• 2002/09/26 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Anthony DeRobertis
• 2002/09/25 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/25 未承諾広告※無料プレゼント お金貸します
• 2002/09/25 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/09/25 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/09/25 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/25 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/25 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/25 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/24 Re: Using the Debian Logo J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Branden Robinson
• 2002/09/24 Using the Debian Logo Bob
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/24 Processed: Re: Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/09/24 Work shoes EN345 S3 S1 wang lan
• 2002/09/24 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/09/23 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Peter Palfrader
• 2002/09/23 Bug#162120: debian-policy: Deletion of configuration files--should it be preserved? Thomas Bushnell BSG
• 2002/09/23 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• 2002/09/23 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/23 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/23 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Joey Hess
• 2002/09/23 http://Worldsat.rtfm.be Worldsat Team
• 2002/09/22 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/09/22 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Joey Hess
• 2002/09/22 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/09/22 Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Joey Hess
• 2002/09/22 [PROPOSAL] Drop 30000-59999 uid/gid reservation Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/09/21 http://Worldsat.rtfm.be Worldsat Team
• 2002/09/21 Bug#39830: please clarify Zack Weinberg
• 2002/09/20 Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Georg Lehner
• 2002/09/20 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• 2002/09/20 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Julian Gilbey
• 2002/09/20 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• 2002/09/20 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/19 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/19 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/19 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Junichi Uekawa
• 2002/09/19 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Georg Lehner
• 2002/09/19 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• 2002/09/19 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Clint Adams
• 2002/09/19 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Julian Gilbey
• 2002/09/19 Re: Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Georg Lehner
• 2002/09/19 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/19 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• 2002/09/19 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/19 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• 2002/09/19 Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Adrian von Bidder
• 2002/09/19 Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2002/09/19 Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Herbert Xu
• 2002/09/19 Bug#161455: debian-policy: reference to ash outdated Clint Adams
• 2002/09/18 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/18 Re: what to put in Maintainer fields [was Re: Accepted po-debconf 0.2.2 (all source)] Clint Adams
• 2002/09/18 Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Jorge . Lehner
• 2002/09/18 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• 2002/09/18 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/18 Whats up ! getrealiwith34
• 2002/09/18 Re: Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Miquel van Smoorenburg
• 2002/09/18 1,5 million actual German email adresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] Informationsgesellschaft mbH Berlin
• 2002/09/17 Preanouncement: Mail-subsystem policy change proposal Jorge . Lehner
• 2002/09/17 Bug#32263: Splitting CGI-BIN Brian White
• 2002/09/16 Bug#160776: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/16 Bug#160776: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality Tollef Fog Heen
• 2002/09/14 Bug#160914: upgrading-checklist: no section numbers for 3.5.7.0 Marcin Owsiany
• 2002/09/14 Bug#160908: debian-policy: Stray plus character in text Matt Zimmerman
• 2002/09/13 Bug#160839: debian-policy: Typo in debconf specification herbert
• 2002/09/13 Unidentified subject! zhaoyan
• 2002/09/13 Bug#160776: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality Carl R. Witty
• 2002/09/13 Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Chris Waters
• 2002/09/13 Re: on the usr/doc symlink Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2002/09/13 Re: on the usr/doc symlink Martin Michlmayr
• 2002/09/13 on the usr/doc symlink Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2002/09/13 Bug#160776: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] debconf spec updates to conform with reality Joey Hess
• 2002/09/13 Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2002/09/13 Re: EARLY PROPOSAL Apache (and webapp?) policy Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/09/12 Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Oliver Elphick
• 2002/09/12 Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Chris Waters
• 2002/09/12 Re: EARLY PROPOSAL Apache (and webapp?) policy Matthew Palmer
• 2002/09/12 Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Oliver Elphick
• 2002/09/12 Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Yann Dirson
• 2002/09/12 Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Yann Dirson
• 2002/09/12 Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Robert Bihlmeyer
• 2002/09/12 Re: Reviewing policy bugs Radovan Garabik
• 2002/09/12 Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/12 EARLY PROPOSAL Apache (and webapp?) policy Ola Lundqvist
• 2002/09/12 Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Julian Gilbey
• 2002/09/12 Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Santiago Vila
• 2002/09/12 Re: build-arch and autobuilders ? Julian Gilbey
• 2002/09/11 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Ben Finney
• 2002/09/11 build-arch and autobuilders ? Yann Dirson
• 2002/09/11 Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2002/09/11 Bug#60979: What /etc/init.d/xxx restart does? Bill Allombert
• 2002/09/10 CVS srivasta: Document recent changes debian-policy
• 2002/09/10 CVS srivasta: Update update-rc.d examples. Mention that one may need to remove and debian-policy
• 2002/09/10 CVS srivasta: Replace postinst by postrm debian-policy
• 2002/09/10 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2002/09/10 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/10 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Chris Waters
• 2002/09/10 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Robert Bihlmeyer
• 2002/09/10 Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/10 Re: Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/10 Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Andrew Suffield
• 2002/09/09 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/09 Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/09 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Branden Robinson
• 2002/09/09 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2002/09/09 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Robert Bihlmeyer
• 2002/09/09 Bug#160248: section 13.3 unnecessarily obscure Andrew Suffield
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/08 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Anthony Towns
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Brendan O'Dea
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/08 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Joey Hess
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Matthew Wilcox
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Adam Heath
• 2002/09/08 Re: Reviewing policy bugs Joey Hess
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/08 Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Adam Heath
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Matthew Wilcox
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Adam Heath
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Adam Heath
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#132767: acknowledged by developer (Reviewing policy bugs) Robert Bihlmeyer
• 2002/09/08 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Chris Waters
• 2002/09/08 Bug#159114: marked as done (debian-policy: non-us server is located in a country where it's possible to patent algorithms) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/09/08 Re: Bug#159114: acknowledged by developer (Patents can't cover software in .nl after all) Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/09/08 Re: [RFC] *-rc.d -> rc.d-* transition Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2002/09/08 Processed: Re: Bug#159114 acknowledged by developer (Patents can't cover software in .nl after all) Debian Bug Tracking System

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]