Thanks for handling the finalization Ekr !
B.

> On 24 Mar 2025, at 22:10, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> 
> Update:
> I have now gone through and addressed all the RPC comments and updated the 
> relevant XML and md accordingly.
> 
> My next step will be to actually read the document top to bottom for final 
> review.
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 8:59 AM Lynne Bartholomew 
> <lbartholo...@staff.rfc-editor.org 
> <mailto:lbartholo...@staff.rfc-editor.org>> wrote:
>> Hi, Eric.  So noted.  Thank you!
>> 
>> RFC Editor/lb
>> 
>> > On Mar 3, 2025, at 6:03 AM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com 
>> > <mailto:e...@rtfm.com>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > I have created issues corresponding to the inline RPC comments/questions 
>> > and have tagged Lynn in them so she can see progress.
>> > 
>> > -Ekr
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 9:51 AM Jean Mahoney 
>> > <jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org>> 
>> > wrote:
>> > Eric,
>> > 
>> > On 2/25/25 3:14 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> > > Update:
>> > > 
>> > > I have backported the copy-edit changes I approve of and reverted the 
>> > > rest in the XML, which can be found here:
>> > > 
>> > > https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture/pull/273 <https://github.com/ 
>> > > mlswg/mls-architecture/pull/273>
>> > > https://github.com/ekr/mls-architecture/blob/merge_rpc_comments/rfc9750- 
>> > > draft.xml <https://github.com/ekr/mls-architecture/blob/ 
>> > > merge_rpc_comments/rfc9750-draft.xml>
>> > > 
>> > > I will next go through the RPC's substantive questions and file GitHub 
>> > > issues for each of them so we can work through them. Is there someone 
>> > > you would like tagged on these issues?
>> > 
>> > Lynne Bartholomew will be the RFC Editor handling this document's 
>> > AUTH48. Her GitHub username is lbartholomew-rpc.
>> > 
>> > Best regards,
>> > Jean
>> > 
>> > > 
>> > > -Ekr
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:46 AM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com 
>> > > <mailto:e...@rtfm.com> 
>> > > <mailto:e...@rtfm.com <mailto:e...@rtfm.com>>> wrote:
>> > > 
>> > >     Per private communication with Alan: a...@duric.net 
>> > > <mailto:a...@duric.net>
>> > >     <mailto:a...@duric.net <mailto:a...@duric.net>>
>> > > 
>> > >     On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 7:50 AM Paul Wouters <paul.wout...@aiven.io 
>> > > <mailto:paul.wout...@aiven.io>
>> > >     <mailto:paul.wout...@aiven.io <mailto:paul.wout...@aiven.io>>> wrote:
>> > > 
>> > >         datatracker says alan.du...@globalipsound.com 
>> > > <mailto:alan.du...@globalipsound.com>
>> > >         <mailto:alan.du...@globalipsound.com 
>> > > <mailto:alan.du...@globalipsound.com>>, added to CC:
>> > > 
>> > >         Paul
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >         On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:47 AM Jean Mahoney
>> > >         <jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org> <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc- 
>> > > <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc->
>> > >         editor.org <http://editor.org/>>> wrote:
>> > > 
>> > >             Hi Ekr,
>> > > 
>> > >             On 2/24/25 8:32 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> > >              >
>> > >              >
>> > >              > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 4:12 PM Jean Mahoney
>> > >             <jmaho...@staff.rfc-
>> > >              > editor.org <http://editor.org/> <http://editor.org 
>> > > <http://editor.org/>>
>> > >             <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org>
>> > >             <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org>>>> wrote:
>> > >              >
>> > >              >     Hi Ekr,
>> > >              >
>> > >              >     On 2/24/25 5:30 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> > >              >      > Hi folks,
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      > This document was prepared in markdown, so it
>> > >             would be much more
>> > >              >      > convenient to do
>> > >              >      > the editorial phase of auth48 in markdown rather
>> > >             than in XML, as I
>> > >              >      > understand has been
>> > >              >      > done for a number of recent documents. I
>> > >             understand that a fair
>> > >              >     amount
>> > >              >      > of work has
>> > >              >      > already happened here, but is there a possibility
>> > >             of getting a
>> > >              >     copy of
>> > >              >      > the markdown
>> > >              >      > with just the copy edit changes?
>> > >              >
>> > >              >     [JM] As draft-ietf-mls-architecture is a long
>> > >             document (41 pages PDF),
>> > >              >     it would be time consuming to port the edits into
>> > >             markdown at this time.
>> > >              >
>> > >              >
>> > >              > Indeed. I've made a repo for the XML [0]. It will take me
>> > >             some time to
>> > >              > backport the changes to the .md file and provide updated 
>> > > XML.
>> > > 
>> > >             [JM] Understood, and the RPC is aiming to accept md as a
>> > >             submission
>> > >             format in the future.
>> > > 
>> > >             Is there another address for Alan Duric? a...@wire.com 
>> > > <mailto:a...@wire.com>
>> > >             <mailto:a...@wire.com <mailto:a...@wire.com>> bounced.
>> > > 
>> > >             Best regards,
>> > >             Jean
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > >              >
>> > >              > -Ekr
>> > >              >
>> > >              >
>> > >              > [0] https://github.com/ekr/rfc9750 <https://github.com/
>> > >             ekr/rfc9750> <https://github.com/ekr/rfc9750 <https://
>> > >             github.com/ekr/rfc9750 <http://github.com/ekr/rfc9750>>>
>> > >              >
>> > >              >
>> > >              >
>> > >              >     It would be much easier to start edits in markdown in
>> > >             a future
>> > >              >     document.
>> > >              >     If you have another markdown file that will be
>> > >             entering the queue soon,
>> > >              >     please let us know, and we can provide an updated
>> > >             markdown file at the
>> > >              >     beginning of AUTH48 as part of one of our process
>> > >             experiments.
>> > >              >
>> > >              >     Thanks and best regards,
>> > >              >     RFC Editor/jm
>> > >              >
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      > -Ekr
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:16 PM <rfc-editor@rfc-
>> > >             editor.org <http://editor.org/> 
>> > > <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>>
>> > >              >     <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc->
>> > >             edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org>>> 
>> > > <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc-> <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc->>
>> > >             <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc-> <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc->>>
>> > >              >      > edi...@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org> <mailto:editor@rfc- <mailto:editor@rfc->
>> > >             editor.org <http://editor.org/>> 
>> > > <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org>
>> > >             <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org>>>>> wrote:
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     *****IMPORTANT*****
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Updated 2025/02/24
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     RFC Author(s):
>> > >              >      >     --------------
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Instructions for Completing AUTH48
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it
>> > >             has been
>> > >              >     reviewed and
>> > >              >      >     approved by you and all coauthors, it will be
>> > >             published as an
>> > >              >     RFC.
>> > >              >      >     If an author is no longer available, there are
>> > >             several remedies
>> > >              >      >     available as listed in the FAQ (https://
>> > >             www.rfc-editor.org/ <http://www.rfc-editor.org/> 
>> > > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/>
>> > >              >     faq/ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/ <https://
>> > >             www.rfc-editor.org/faq/ <http://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/>>>
>> > >              >      >     <https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/ <https://
>> > >             www.rfc-editor.org/faq/ <http://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/>> 
>> > > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/
>> > >             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/>
>> > >              >     faq/>>).
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     You and you coauthors are responsible for
>> > >             engaging other parties
>> > >              >      >     (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as
>> > >             necessary before
>> > >              >     providing
>> > >              >      >     your approval.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Planning your review
>> > >              >      >     ---------------------
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Please review the following aspects of your
>> > >             document:
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     *  RFC Editor questions
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         Please review and resolve any questions
>> > >             raised by the RFC
>> > >              >     Editor
>> > >              >      >         that have been included in the XML file as
>> > >             comments marked as
>> > >              >      >         follows:
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         <!-- [rfced] ... -->
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         These questions will also be sent in a
>> > >             subsequent email.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     *  Changes submitted by coauthors
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         Please ensure that you review any changes
>> > >             submitted by your
>> > >              >      >         coauthors.  We assume that if you do not
>> > >             speak up that you
>> > >              >      >         agree to changes submitted by your 
>> > > coauthors.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     *  Content
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         Please review the full content of the
>> > >             document, as this
>> > >              >     cannot
>> > >              >      >         change once the RFC is published.  Please
>> > >             pay particular
>> > >              >      >     attention to:
>> > >              >      >         - IANA considerations updates (if 
>> > > applicable)
>> > >              >      >         - contact information
>> > >              >      >         - references
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     *  Copyright notices and legends
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         Please review the copyright notice and
>> > >             legends as defined in
>> > >              >      >         RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
>> > >              >      >         (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-
>> > >             info <https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info> <https://
>> > >              > trustee.ietf.org/license-info 
>> > > <http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info> <http://trustee.ietf.org/
>> > >             license-info>> <https://
>> > >              >      > trustee.ietf.org/license-info 
>> > > <http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info> <http://
>> > >             trustee.ietf.org/license-info 
>> > > <http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info>> <http://trustee.ietf.org/
>> > >             license- <http://trustee.ietf.org/license->
>> > >              >     info>>).
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     *  Semantic markup
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         Please review the markup in the XML file
>> > >             to ensure that
>> > >              >     elements of
>> > >              >      >         content are correctly tagged.  For
>> > >             example, ensure that
>> > >              >      >     <sourcecode>
>> > >              >      >         and <artwork> are set correctly.  See
>> > >             details at
>> > >              >      >         <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-
>> > >             vocabulary <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>
>> > >             <https://
>> > >              > authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary 
>> > > <http://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary> <http://
>> > >             authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary 
>> > > <http://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>>> <https://
>> > >              >      > authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary 
>> > > <http://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary> <http://
>> > >             authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary 
>> > > <http://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>> <http://
>> > >             authors.ietf.org/ <http://authors.ietf.org/> 
>> > > <http://authors.ietf.org/>
>> > >              >     rfcxml-vocabulary>>>.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     *  Formatted output
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files
>> > >             to ensure that the
>> > >              >      >         formatted output, as generated from the
>> > >             markup in the XML
>> > >              >     file, is
>> > >              >      >         reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will
>> > >             have formatting
>> > >              >      >         limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Submitting changes
>> > >              >      >     ------------------
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     To submit changes, please reply to this email
>> > >             using ‘REPLY
>> > >              >     ALL’ as all
>> > >              >      >     the parties CCed on this message need to see
>> > >             your changes.
>> > >              >     The parties
>> > >              >      >     include:
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         *  your coauthors
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         * rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc->
>> > >             edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org>> 
>> > > <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc- <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-> <mailto:rfc- 
>> > > <mailto:rfc->
>> > >             editor@rfc->
>> > >              > editor.org <http://editor.org/> <http://editor.org 
>> > > <http://editor.org/>>> <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc- <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc->
>> > >             editor.org <http://editor.org/> 
>> > > <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>> 
>> > > <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc->
>> > >             <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc->>
>> > >              > edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org> 
>> > > <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org>>>>
>> > >              >      >     (the RPC team)
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         *  other document participants, depending
>> > >             on the stream
>> > >              >     (e.g.,
>> > >              >      >            IETF Stream participants are your
>> > >             working group
>> > >              >     chairs, the
>> > >              >      >            responsible ADs, and the document
>> > >             shepherd).
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >         * auth48archive@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-> 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc->>
>> > >              > editor.org <http://editor.org/> <http://editor.org 
>> > > <http://editor.org/>>>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-> 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc->>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-> 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc->>>
>> > >              >      > editor.org <http://editor.org/> <http://editor.org 
>> > > <http://editor.org/>> <http://editor.org <http://editor.org/>
>> > >             <http://editor.org <http://editor.org/>>>>, which is a new 
>> > > archival mailing list
>> > >              >      >            to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is
>> > >             not an active
>> > >              >     discussion
>> > >              >      >            list:
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >           *  More info:
>> > >              >      > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-
>> > >             announce/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-
>> > >             announce/> <https://
>> > >              > mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/ 
>> > > <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/> <http://
>> > >             mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/ 
>> > > <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/>>>
>> > >              >      >     yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc <https://
>> > >             mailarchive.ietf.org/ <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/> 
>> > > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/>
>> > >              >     arch/msg/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/
>> > >             <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/>>
>> > >              >      >     ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc>
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >           *  The archive itself:
>> > >              >      > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/
>> > >             auth48archive/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/
>> > >             auth48archive/> <https://
>> > >              > mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ 
>> > > <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/> <http://
>> > >             mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ 
>> > > <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>>> <https://
>> > >              >      > mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ 
>> > > <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
>> > >             <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
>> > >             <http://
>> > >              > mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ 
>> > > <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/> <http://
>> > >             mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ 
>> > > <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>>>>
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >           *  Note: If only absolutely necessary,
>> > >             you may
>> > >              >     temporarily opt
>> > >              >      >     out
>> > >              >      >              of the archiving of messages (e.g.,
>> > >             to discuss a
>> > >              >     sensitive
>> > >              >      >     matter).
>> > >              >      >              If needed, please add a note at the
>> > >             top of the
>> > >              >     message that
>> > >              >      >     you
>> > >              >      >              have dropped the address. When the
>> > >             discussion is
>> > >              >     concluded,
>> > >              >      > auth48archive@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-> 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc->>
>> > >              > editor.org <http://editor.org/> <http://editor.org 
>> > > <http://editor.org/>>>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>>
>> > >              >     <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
>> > >             <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org 
>> > > <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>>>>
>> > >              >      >     will be re-added to the CC list and
>> > >              >      >              its addition will be noted at the top
>> > >             of the message.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     An update to the provided XML file
>> > >              >      >       — OR —
>> > >              >      >     An explicit list of changes in this format
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Section # (or indicate Global)
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     OLD:
>> > >              >      >     old text
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     NEW:
>> > >              >      >     new text
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     You do not need to reply with both an updated
>> > >             XML file and an
>> > >              >     explicit
>> > >              >      >     list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     We will ask a stream manager to review and
>> > >             approve any
>> > >              >     changes that seem
>> > >              >      >     beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of
>> > >             new text,
>> > >              >     deletion of
>> > >              >      >     text,
>> > >              >      >     and technical changes.  Information about
>> > >             stream managers can be
>> > >              >      >     found in
>> > >              >      >     the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require
>> > >             approval from a stream
>> > >              >      >     manager.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Approving for publication
>> > >              >      >     --------------------------
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     To approve your RFC for publication, please
>> > >             reply to this
>> > >              >     email stating
>> > >              >      >     that you approve this RFC for publication. 
>> > >             Please use ‘REPLY
>> > >              >     ALL’,
>> > >              >      >     as all the parties CCed on this message need
>> > >             to see your
>> > >              >     approval.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Files
>> > >              >      >     -----
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     The files are available here:
>> > >              >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml
>> > >             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml> <https://
>> > >             www.rfc- <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >              > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             authors/rfc9750.xml>> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> 
>> > > <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >             <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> <https://www.rfc- 
>> > > <https://www.rfc-/>>>
>> > >              >      > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             authors/rfc9750.xml> <http://editor.org/authors/ <http://
>> > >             editor.org/authors/ <http://editor.org/authors/>>
>> > >              >     rfc9750.xml>>
>> > >              >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html
>> > >             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html> <https://
>> > >             www.rfc- <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >              > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             authors/rfc9750.html>> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> 
>> > > <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >             <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> <https://www.rfc- 
>> > > <https://www.rfc-/>>>
>> > >              >      > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html> <http://
>> > >             editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html>> <http://editor.org/authors/
>> > >             <http://editor.org/authors/>
>> > >              >     rfc9750.html>>
>> > >              >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf
>> > >             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf> <https://
>> > >             www.rfc- <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >              > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             authors/rfc9750.pdf>> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> 
>> > > <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >             <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> <https://www.rfc- 
>> > > <https://www.rfc-/>>>
>> > >              >      > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             authors/rfc9750.pdf> <http://editor.org/authors/ <http://
>> > >             editor.org/authors/ <http://editor.org/authors/>>
>> > >              >     rfc9750.pdf>>
>> > >              >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt
>> > >             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt> <https://
>> > >             www.rfc- <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >              > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             authors/rfc9750.txt>> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> 
>> > > <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >             <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> <https://www.rfc- 
>> > > <https://www.rfc-/>>>
>> > >              >      > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             authors/rfc9750.txt> <http://editor.org/authors/ <http://
>> > >             editor.org/authors/ <http://editor.org/authors/>>
>> > >              >     rfc9750.txt>>
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Diff file of the text:
>> > >              >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-
>> > >             diff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-
>> > >             diff.html> <https://
>> > >              > www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html> <http://
>> > >             www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html>>> <https://
>> > >              >      > www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html>
>> > >             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html>
>> > >             <http://www.rfc- <http://www.rfc-/> <http://www.rfc- 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >              > editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             authors/rfc9750-diff.html>>>
>> > >              >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-
>> > >             rfcdiff.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-
>> > >             rfcdiff.html> <https://
>> > >              > www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html> <http://
>> > >             www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html>>> <https://
>> > >              >      > www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html>
>> > >             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html>
>> > >             <http://www.rfc- <http://www.rfc-/> <http://www.rfc- 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >              > editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html> <http://
>> > >             editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html>>>> (side by side)
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Diff of the XML:
>> > >              >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-
>> > >             xmldiff1.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-
>> > >             xmldiff1.html>
>> > >              >     <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-
>> > >             xmldiff1.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-
>> > >             xmldiff1.html>> <https://
>> > >              >      > www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html>
>> > >             <http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html>
>> > >             <http://www.rfc- <http://www.rfc-/> <http://www.rfc- 
>> > > <http://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >              > editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html> <http://
>> > >             editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html 
>> > > <http://editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html>>>>
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Tracking progress
>> > >              >      >     -----------------
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     The details of the AUTH48 status of your
>> > >             document are here:
>> > >              >      > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9750
>> > >             <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9750> <https://
>> > >             www.rfc- <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>
>> > >              > editor.org/auth48/rfc9750 
>> > > <http://editor.org/auth48/rfc9750> <http://editor.org/auth48/
>> > >             rfc9750>> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/> 
>> > > <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>> <https://
>> > >             www.rfc- <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-/>>>
>> > >              >      > editor.org/auth48/rfc9750 
>> > > <http://editor.org/auth48/rfc9750> <http://editor.org/
>> > >             auth48/rfc9750> <http://editor.org/auth48/rfc9750 <http://
>> > >             editor.org/auth48/rfc9750 
>> > > <http://editor.org/auth48/rfc9750>>>>
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Please let us know if you have any questions.
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Thank you for your cooperation,
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     RFC Editor
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     --------------------------------------
>> > >              >      >     RFC 9750 (draft-ietf-mls-architecture-15)
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >     Title            : The Messaging Layer
>> > >             Security (MLS)
>> > >              >     Architecture
>> > >              >      >     Author(s)        : B. Beurdouche, E. Rescorla,
>> > >             E. Omara, S.
>> > >              >     Inguva,
>> > >              >      >     A. Duric
>> > >              >      >     WG Chair(s)      : Nick Sullivan, Sean Turner
>> > >              >      >     Area Director(s) : Deb Cooley, Paul Wouters
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >      >
>> > >              >
>> > > 
>> > 
>> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to