Hi Ekr, On 2/24/25 8:32 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 4:12 PM Jean Mahoney <jmaho...@staff.rfc- editor.org <mailto:jmaho...@staff.rfc-editor.org>> wrote:Hi Ekr, On 2/24/25 5:30 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Hi folks, > > This document was prepared in markdown, so it would be much more > convenient to do > the editorial phase of auth48 in markdown rather than in XML, as I > understand has been > done for a number of recent documents. I understand that a fair amount > of work has > already happened here, but is there a possibility of getting a copy of > the markdown > with just the copy edit changes? [JM] As draft-ietf-mls-architecture is a long document (41 pages PDF), it would be time consuming to port the edits into markdown at this time. Indeed. I've made a repo for the XML [0]. It will take me some time to backport the changes to the .md file and provide updated XML.
[JM] Understood, and the RPC is aiming to accept md as a submission format in the future.
Is there another address for Alan Duric? a...@wire.com bounced. Best regards, Jean
-Ekr [0] https://github.com/ekr/rfc9750 <https://github.com/ekr/rfc9750> It would be much easier to start edits in markdown in a future document. If you have another markdown file that will be entering the queue soon, please let us know, and we can provide an updated markdown file at the beginning of AUTH48 as part of one of our process experiments. Thanks and best regards, RFC Editor/jm > > -Ekr > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:16 PM <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> <mailto:rfc- <mailto:rfc-> > edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:edi...@rfc-editor.org>>> wrote: > > *****IMPORTANT***** > > Updated 2025/02/24 > > RFC Author(s): > -------------- > > Instructions for Completing AUTH48 > > Your document has now entered AUTH48. Once it has been reviewed and > approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC. > If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies > available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/ faq/ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/> > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/ faq/>>). > > You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties > (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing > your approval. > > Planning your review > --------------------- > > Please review the following aspects of your document: > > * RFC Editor questions > > Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor > that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as > follows: > > <!-- [rfced] ... --> > > These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email. > > * Changes submitted by coauthors > > Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your > coauthors. We assume that if you do not speak up that you > agree to changes submitted by your coauthors. > > * Content > > Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot > change once the RFC is published. Please pay particular > attention to: > - IANA considerations updates (if applicable) > - contact information > - references > > * Copyright notices and legends > > Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in > RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions > (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info <https:// trustee.ietf.org/license-info> <https:// > trustee.ietf.org/license-info <http://trustee.ietf.org/license- info>>). > > * Semantic markup > > Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of > content are correctly tagged. For example, ensure that > <sourcecode> > and <artwork> are set correctly. See details at > <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary <https:// authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary> <https:// > authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary <http://authors.ietf.org/ rfcxml-vocabulary>>>. > > * Formatted output > > Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the > formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is > reasonable. Please note that the TXT will have formatting > limitations compared to the PDF and HTML. > > > Submitting changes > ------------------ > > To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all > the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties > include: > > * your coauthors > > * rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-editor@rfc- editor.org> <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org <mailto:rfc- edi...@rfc-editor.org>> > (the RPC team) > > * other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g., > IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the > responsible ADs, and the document shepherd). > > * auth48archive@rfc-editor.org <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- editor.org> <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-> > editor.org <http://editor.org>>, which is a new archival mailing list > to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion > list: > > * More info: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/ <https:// mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/> > yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/ arch/msg/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/> > ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc> > > * The archive itself: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ <https:// mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/> <https:// > mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/ <http:// mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>> > > * Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt > out > of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive > matter). > If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that > you > have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded, > auth48archive@rfc-editor.org <mailto:auth48archive@rfc- editor.org> <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>> > will be re-added to the CC list and > its addition will be noted at the top of the message. > > You may submit your changes in one of two ways: > > An update to the provided XML file > — OR — > An explicit list of changes in this format > > Section # (or indicate Global) > > OLD: > old text > > NEW: > new text > > You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit > list of changes, as either form is sufficient. > > We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem > beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of > text, > and technical changes. Information about stream managers can be > found in > the FAQ. Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream > manager. > > > Approving for publication > -------------------------- > > To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating > that you approve this RFC for publication. Please use ‘REPLY ALL’, > as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval. > > > Files > ----- > > The files are available here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml <https://www.rfc- editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-> > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.xml <http://editor.org/authors/ rfc9750.xml>> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html <https://www.rfc- editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-> > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.html <http://editor.org/authors/ rfc9750.html>> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf <https://www.rfc- editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-> > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.pdf <http://editor.org/authors/ rfc9750.pdf>> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt <https://www.rfc- editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-> > editor.org/authors/rfc9750.txt <http://editor.org/authors/ rfc9750.txt>> > > Diff file of the text: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html <https:// www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html> <https:// > www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html <http://www.rfc- editor.org/authors/rfc9750-diff.html>> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html <https:// www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html> <https:// > www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html <http://www.rfc- editor.org/authors/rfc9750-rfcdiff.html>> (side by side) > > Diff of the XML: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html> <https:// > www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html <http://www.rfc- editor.org/authors/rfc9750-xmldiff1.html>> > > > Tracking progress > ----------------- > > The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9750 <https://www.rfc- editor.org/auth48/rfc9750> <https://www.rfc- <https://www.rfc-> > editor.org/auth48/rfc9750 <http://editor.org/auth48/rfc9750>> > > Please let us know if you have any questions. > > Thank you for your cooperation, > > RFC Editor > > -------------------------------------- > RFC 9750 (draft-ietf-mls-architecture-15) > > Title : The Messaging Layer Security (MLS) Architecture > Author(s) : B. Beurdouche, E. Rescorla, E. Omara, S. Inguva, > A. Duric > WG Chair(s) : Nick Sullivan, Sean Turner > Area Director(s) : Deb Cooley, Paul Wouters > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
