It looks like that product just gives you the features that are
automatically included in the Symantec boot recovery disk.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> For those that do need more, take a look at Cristie TBMR. IBM resells it:
>
>         http://www.cristie.com/recover/tbmr/
>
> From their doc:
>
> "TBMR allows you to perform a bare machine recovery of your system direct
> from a TSM backup. Your critical systems are protected from the
> consequences of physical damage, human error, or system failure. Users can
> recover their protected servers to any point in time provided by TSM as
> well as schedule simulated recoveries. TBMR is re-sold globally by IBM and
> its channel partners as the recommended system recovery solution for TSM.
> It’s currently available for Windows, Linux, Solaris and AIX operating
> systems."
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Del
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/14/2016
> 02:18:03 AM:
>
> > From: Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folke...@gmail.com>
> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Date: 12/14/2016 02:18 AM
> > Subject: Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> >
> > I'm going to have to agree on this one from Tom, I also find it strange
> > that IBM doesn't just offer a recovery disk or at least a good tool so
> you
> > only have to pick the correct B/A client and it will create it for you.
> >
> > Many of our clients are close to 100% virtualized but we also have
> around
> > 15-20% of our customers that will probably never virtualize for 100%,
> they
> > are running very specialized systems that require 100% of the CPU in the
> > server or are transferring truly huge amounts of data that would impact
> the
> > other VM's if ran in VMware. So they run on physical hosts and have to
> deal
> > with the PE thing that is kind of hard to get over to be honest.
> >
> > But yes, I have made those disks and they work but the procedure for
> using
> > them isn't very simple so you need a windows administrator that knows
> his
> > stuff. Tt's not a fire and forget kind of procedure even if you have a
> > working disk.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Tom Alverson <tom.alver...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The worst part about this is the extremely poor setup IBM has for
> doing an
> > > offline restore.  They give you the instructions to create your own
> boot
> > > disk.  I read it over and could not believe IBM did not have a nice
> > > pre-made recovery boot disk like Symantec, AVAMAR and Networker do.
> Are
> > > there any plans for IBM to do this?  Has anyone successfully made one
> of
> > > these do it yourself recovery disks?
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Hans Christian Riksheim <
> > > bull...@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Del.
> > > >
> > > > Why no prior warning? This was news to me until the 8.1 GA. We have
> > > several
> > > > environments where BMR is based on online systemstate restore(which
> works
> > > > very well) and now these customers say that they are ready to roll
> out
> > > > Win2016. Now there is a rush to look at solutions to this sudden
> problem
> > > > including testing that cumbersome PE procedure to avoid a time
> window
> > > with
> > > > no tested method for BMR.
> > > >
> > > > Hans Chr.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hans Chr.,
> > > > >
> > > > > Microsoft has had this position since 2008, but IBM still tried to
> > > > support
> > > > > it due to customer requests. It led to too many situations where a
> > > system
> > > > > was unstable after a restore.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Del
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on
> 12/13/2016
> > > > > 06:42:55 AM:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: Hans Christian Riksheim <bull...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > > > > > Date: 12/13/2016 06:43 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> > > > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am not sure if I follow. Has Microsoft communicated a change
> in its
> > > > > > support for systemstate restores or is it just IBMs decision to
> not
> > > > > bother
> > > > > > with it anymore?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hans Chr.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Del Hoobler
> <hoob...@us.ibm.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's true IBM Spectrum Protect did support online system state
> > > > > restores
> > > > > > > before, but it is against Microsoft's best practices to
> support it.
> > > > > IBM
> > > > > > > Spectrum Protect 8.1 is more strictly enforcing the documented
> best
> > > > > > > practices from Microsoft for system state restores.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > IBM did not drop the API support for LoP BE specifically so
> that
> > > Data
> > > > > > > Protection for SAP HANA on Power BE continues to be supported.
> > > > > However,
> > > > > > > IBM's strategic direction is LoP LE (
> > > > > > >
> > > > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-
> > > > power-little-endian-faq-trs/
> > > > > > > ). Both SAP and Data Protection for SAP HANA have LoP LE
> support on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > roadmap for 1H17. Your investment in Linux on Power is safe,
> it is
> > > > > just
> > > > > > > that the software will switch to LE architecture from current
> BE
> > > > > > > architecture in the future.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Del
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on
> > > 12/12/2016
> > > > > > > 10:18:18 AM:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: Martin Janosik <martin.jano...@cz.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > > > > > > > Date: 12/12/2016 10:19 AM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> > > > > > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm also a bit nervous and curoius at the same time about
> > > > > discontinued
> > > > > > > > functions, namely:
> > > > > > > > Online system state restores - You can no longer restore the
> > > system
> > > > > > > state
> > > > > > > > on a system that is online. Instead, use the Automated
> System
> > > > > Recovery
> > > > > > > > (ASR) based recovery method to restore the system state in
> > > offline
> > > > > > > Windows
> > > > > > > > Preinstallation Environment (PE) mode.
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > The following operating systems are no longer supported by
> the
> > > > > > > > backup-archive client:
> > > > > > > > Linux on Power Systems™ (big endian). You can still use the
> IBM
> > > > > Spectrum
> > > > > > > > Protect API on Linux on Power Systems (big endian).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What is the idea behind "to be competive with x86 platform
> and
> > > get
> > > > > > > > compativility certification for SAP HANA with Linux on Power
> > > > > platform
> > > > > > > (Big
> > > > > > > > Endian)" (ref.
> > > > > > > > https://blogs.saphana.com/2015/08/21/announcing-general-
> > > > > > > > availability-of-sap-hana-on-ibm-power-systems/
> > > > > > > > ) and then 1.5 year later drop support of BAclient for OS"?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We deployed 10+ big SAP HANA on Power8 instances last year,
> and
> > > now
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > be getting "not supported" for new releases?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > M. Janosik
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on
> > > > 12/09/2016
> > > > > > > > 02:45:34 PM:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > From: Chavdar Cholev <chavdar.cho...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > > > > > > > > Date: 12/09/2016 02:47 PM
> > > > > > > > > Subject: [ADSM-L] ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> > > > > > > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Does some one check discontinued functions in new
> version...
> > > > > > > > > especially part of no VM backup as standard function in BA
> > > > > client....
> > > > > > > > > It is not good at all. TDP for Virtual environment for
> hyper-V
> > > > > creats
> > > > > > > > diff
> > > > > > > > > hdds (.avhdx)
> > > > > > > > > and my customers will not be happy with this, because you
> have
> > > to
> > > > > > > merge
> > > > > > > > > these file,
> > > > > > > > > when you need to expand .vhdx disk for example ....
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > :(
> > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > Cahvdar
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to