Hi Tom,

I assume you are referring to the BA Client Java GUI? Spectrum Protect has 
always required the JRE for the Java GUI (on Windows, IBM ships it, on 
UNIX/Linux IBM requires the customer to install it because IBM does not 
ship it). 


Del

----------------------------------------------------

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/13/2016 
06:37:04 PM:

> From: Tom Alverson <tom.alver...@gmail.com>
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 12/13/2016 06:37 PM
> Subject: Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> 
> I just installed 8.1.0.0 and the GUI tells me I need to install  JRE 
1.7.0
> or greater.  I have not rebooted yet.  Is this correct?  I did not see 
that
> anywhere in the release or install notes.   There is no way we want to
> install java on all of our servers....
> 
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Tom Alverson <tom.alver...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > About 20% of our servers are physical so that does not help there. 
Also
> > we back up almost all of our VM's with the conventional TSM client. We 
do
> > some TSM for VE backup (mainly for critical systems that we need to be 
able
> > to recover quickly) but the amount of effort to troubleshoot backup 
issues
> > is much higher on TSM for VE and you are also forced to back up ALL of 
the
> > data that changes every night including swap files and temp files 
since TSM
> > for VE cannot do any exclusions yet (like Veeam does).
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com> 
wrote:
> >
> >> Let me ask a related question. Does the hypervisor world mitigate the 
need
> >> for this? I am seeing fewer and fewer requests for this type of 
recovery
> >> because of the capabilities of hypervisors and hypervisor-based 
backups.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Del
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 12/13/2016
> >> 05:42:38 PM:
> >>
> >> > From: Tom Alverson <tom.alver...@gmail.com>
> >> > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> >> > Date: 12/13/2016 05:44 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> >> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> >> >
> >> > The worst part about this is the extremely poor setup IBM has for 
doing
> >> an
> >> > offline restore.  They give you the instructions to create your own 
boot
> >> > disk.  I read it over and could not believe IBM did not have a nice
> >> > pre-made recovery boot disk like Symantec, AVAMAR and Networker do. 
 Are
> >> > there any plans for IBM to do this?  Has anyone successfully made 
one of
> >> > these do it yourself recovery disks?
> >> >
> >> > Tom
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Hans Christian Riksheim
> >> <bull...@gmail.com
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Del.
> >> > >
> >> > > Why no prior warning? This was news to me until the 8.1 GA. We 
have
> >> several
> >> > > environments where BMR is based on online systemstate 
restore(which
> >> works
> >> > > very well) and now these customers say that they are ready to 
roll out
> >> > > Win2016. Now there is a rush to look at solutions to this sudden
> >> problem
> >> > > including testing that cumbersome PE procedure to avoid a time 
window
> >> with
> >> > > no tested method for BMR.
> >> > >
> >> > > Hans Chr.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Del Hoobler <hoob...@us.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Hans Chr.,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Microsoft has had this position since 2008, but IBM still tried 
to
> >> > > support
> >> > > > it due to customer requests. It led to too many situations 
where a
> >> system
> >> > > > was unstable after a restore.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Del
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on
> >> 12/13/2016
> >> > > > 06:42:55 AM:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > From: Hans Christian Riksheim <bull...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> >> > > > > Date: 12/13/2016 06:43 AM
> >> > > > > Subject: Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> >> > > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I am not sure if I follow. Has Microsoft communicated a 
change in
> >> its
> >> > > > > support for systemstate restores or is it just IBMs decision 
to
> >> not
> >> > > > bother
> >> > > > > with it anymore?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Hans Chr.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Del Hoobler 
<hoob...@us.ibm.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hi Martin,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > It's true IBM Spectrum Protect did support online system 
state
> >> > > > restores
> >> > > > > > before, but it is against Microsoft's best practices to 
support
> >> it.
> >> > > > IBM
> >> > > > > > Spectrum Protect 8.1 is more strictly enforcing the 
documented
> >> best
> >> > > > > > practices from Microsoft for system state restores.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > IBM did not drop the API support for LoP BE specifically so 
that
> >> Data
> >> > > > > > Protection for SAP HANA on Power BE continues to be 
supported.
> >> > > > However,
> >> > > > > > IBM's strategic direction is LoP LE (
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-
> >> > > power-little-endian-faq-trs/
> >> > > > > > ). Both SAP and Data Protection for SAP HANA have LoP LE 
support
> >> on
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > roadmap for 1H17. Your investment in Linux on Power is 
safe, it
> >> is
> >> > > > just
> >> > > > > > that the software will switch to LE architecture from 
current BE
> >> > > > > > architecture in the future.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Del
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on
> >> 12/12/2016
> >> > > > > > 10:18:18 AM:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > From: Martin Janosik <martin.jano...@cz.ibm.com>
> >> > > > > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> >> > > > > > > Date: 12/12/2016 10:19 AM
> >> > > > > > > Subject: Re: ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> >> > > > > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I'm also a bit nervous and curoius at the same time about
> >> > > > discontinued
> >> > > > > > > functions, namely:
> >> > > > > > > Online system state restores - You can no longer restore 
the
> >> system
> >> > > > > > state
> >> > > > > > > on a system that is online. Instead, use the Automated 
System
> >> > > > Recovery
> >> > > > > > > (ASR) based recovery method to restore the system state 
in
> >> offline
> >> > > > > > Windows
> >> > > > > > > Preinstallation Environment (PE) mode.
> >> > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > The following operating systems are no longer supported 
by the
> >> > > > > > > backup-archive client:
> >> > > > > > > Linux on Power Systems™ (big endian). You can still use 
the
> >> IBM
> >> > > > Spectrum
> >> > > > > > > Protect API on Linux on Power Systems (big endian).
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > What is the idea behind "to be competive with x86 
platform and
> >> get
> >> > > > > > > compativility certification for SAP HANA with Linux on 
Power
> >> > > > platform
> >> > > > > > (Big
> >> > > > > > > Endian)" (ref.
> >> > > > > > > https://blogs.saphana.com/2015/08/21/announcing-general-
> >> > > > > > > availability-of-sap-hana-on-ibm-power-systems/
> >> > > > > > > ) and then 1.5 year later drop support of BAclient for 
OS"?
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > We deployed 10+ big SAP HANA on Power8 instances last 
year,
> >> and now
> >> > > > we
> >> > > > > > will
> >> > > > > > > be getting "not supported" for new releases?
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > M. Janosik
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on
> >> > > 12/09/2016
> >> > > > > > > 02:45:34 PM:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > From: Chavdar Cholev <chavdar.cho...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > > > > To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> >> > > > > > > > Date: 12/09/2016 02:47 PM
> >> > > > > > > > Subject: [ADSM-L] ISP 81 Discontinued functions
> >> > > > > > > > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
<ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU>
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Does some one check discontinued functions in new 
version...
> >> > > > > > > > especially part of no VM backup as standard function in 
BA
> >> > > > client....
> >> > > > > > > > It is not good at all. TDP for Virtual environment for
> >> hyper-V
> >> > > > creats
> >> > > > > > > diff
> >> > > > > > > > hdds (.avhdx)
> >> > > > > > > > and my customers will not be happy with this, because 
you
> >> have to
> >> > > > > > merge
> >> > > > > > > > these file,
> >> > > > > > > > when you need to expand .vhdx disk for example ....
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > :(
> >> > > > > > > > Regards
> >> > > > > > > > Cahvdar
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 


Reply via email to