you need to create a debug/run configuration with arguments set properly.
you can find the arguments by reading run.sh

sry for the typing. i just got a problem with my adsl. i'm sending this
with my nexus one.
在 2013-12-6 上午2:31,"Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com>写道:

> ok, I undid that. But now I am not sure what the run command should be in
> eclipse.
> or should I just run from a command window?
>
> *Trying in eclipse:*
>
> I do notice in Eclipse under "Run As" an Ant option.
> It is set to use "${workspace_loc:/wave/src/com/google/gwt/build.xml}" but
> doesn't have any other options set.
> Running it results in;
> Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\src\com\google\gwt\build.xml
>
>
> *BUILD FAILEDC:\TomsProjects\wave\src\com\google\gwt\build.xml:15: Cannot
> find C:\TomsProjects\wave\src\com\google\gwt\${build.common.path} imported
> from C:\TomsProjects\wave\src\com\google\gwt\build.xml*
>
> Total time: 656 milliseconds
> C:\TomsProjects\wave\src\com\google\gwt\build.xml exists ok, so its
> something weong with that "common path" link.
>
> *Alternative;*
>
> Looking at the old guide it says to use "ant editor-hosted" for the "test
> harness"
> I try this and the old gwt development window pops up.
> Putting this url into the browser...
> ...works! At least, pretty sure. I dont exactly know what this wave panel
> harness is supposed to do.  Show raw blip data or something?
>
> It has a log like;
>
>
>
>
>
> *"test (1385940730.122): Set content1 took: 1258.0 (Pojo creation: 244.0,
> rendering: 1014.0editor (1385940731.741): Incoming
> operationBufferedInit@17162e7[]test (1385940731.789): Set content2 took:
> 1164.0 Just the op: 554.0 Op + appendChild: 556.0 editor (1385940732.863):
> Incoming operationBuffered@149b8b5[<< body {}; << line {}; >>; >>; ]editor
> (1385940733.130): Incoming operationBuffered@1bebbed[__1; r@ {} {}; __2;
> ]editor (1385940736.195): Focusing at last valid point as a catch-all"*
>
> Which seems to be working.
> I close this, and try "ant waveharness-hosted" instead. This gives 4
> unresolved imports in the GWT dev mode log, before a empty rectangle
> appears in the browser.  "Active" and "Timing" appear the corner.
>
> Next I try "ant hosted-gwt" as the old guide says:
> This seems to result in it not being able to find the URL of the host page;
> *        00:00:00.000 [WARN] No startup URLs supplied and no plausible ones
> found -- use -startupUrl*
>
> I am not sure what url I am supposed to supply. My own gwt projects
> generally either have the html in a public folder in src, or just in the
> war folder. I do see a lot of html's but none seem obvious.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 5 December 2013 15:05, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > *Told it it was a gwt project (not 100% sure thats correct, as only
> part of
> > > its gwt...seems to work though)
> >
> > Don't do that. I don't think it's a standard GWT project in the SDK point
> > of view. That's why you got the two errors.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Note#:
> > > *Imported as existing project into eclipse.
> > > *Told it it was a gwt project (not 100% sure thats correct, as only
> part of
> > > its gwt...seems to work though)
> > > *2 errors;
> > > -The GWT SDK JAR gwt-servlet.jar is missing in the WEB-INF/lib
> directory
> > > -The web.xml file does not exist WEB-INF /wave/war
> > > However, I assume these can be ignored as we arnt using gwt for any of
> the
> > > server stuff are we?
> > > *2404 warnings...but thats normal for a project of this size ;)
> > >
> > >
> > > ~~~
> > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5 December 2013 12:57, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > oh, it already has Eclipse stuff. *smacks head* thought that had to
> be
> > > > built separately first before it would be ready.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > regarding compile times; I'll see how fast the GWT stuff compiles on
> its
> > > > own, as mentioned earlier I think the majority of my 5 hour build was
> for
> > > > the server stuff, not the client.
> > > > If the problem is somehow specific to me - either due to my XP, or
> the
> > > > 2Gig or ram, or something else about my system, then its not worth
> > > worrying
> > > > much.
> > > > If the problem is likely to effect others though, we should look into
> it,
> > > > either a fix, or the virtual machine as an option.
> > > > The quicker people can dive into the code, the less likely they are
> to
> > > > lose their enthusiasm before they even start ;)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ~~~
> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5 December 2013 10:23, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> If you get the source code from https://github.com/apache/wave, I'd
> > > >> suggest to import Wave in a Box directly as an existing Eclipse
> project.
> > > >> [image: Inline image 1]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Is there a command for serverstuff+gwt-dev ? As I think that would
> be
> > > >>> useful to recommend in the guide, rather then the full
> serverstuff+32
> > > >>> permutations.  (yet you don't just want "compile-gwt-dev" either,
> as I
> > > >>> assume that's without ant server stuff).
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Stuck#4:
> > > >>> How do I currently get it setup for Eclipse?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The old guide says;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ant eclipse
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Will give me the project files needed, but this gives me an error;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:79: Execute failed:
> java.io.IOException:
> > > >>> Cannot r
> > > >>> un program "tools\eclipse.sh": CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a
> > > valid
> > > >>> Win32
> > > >>> application
> > > >>>         at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:470)
> > > >>>         at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>>
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute$Java13CommandLauncher.exec(Exec
> > > >>> ute.java:827)
> > > >>>         at
> > > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.launch(Execute.java:445)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.execute(Execute.java:459)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>>
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExecute(ExecTask.java:635)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExec(ExecTask.java:676)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.execute(ExecTask.java:502)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>>
> org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291)
> > > >>>         at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown
> Source)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
> > > >>> sorImpl.java:25)
> > > >>>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>>
> org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.jav
> > > >>> a:106)
> > > >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348)
> > > >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:390)
> > > >>>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:411)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>>
> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1360)
> > > >>>         at
> > > org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1329)
> > > >>>         at
> > > >>>
> org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExe
> > > >>> cutor.java:41)
> > > >>>         at
> > > org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1212)
> > > >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:801)
> > > >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:218)
> > > >>>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:280)
> > > >>>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:109)
> > > >>> Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not
> a
> > > >>> valid
> > > >>> Win32
> > > >>>  application
> > > >>>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.create(Native Method)
> > > >>>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.<init>(ProcessImpl.java:177)
> > > >>>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:28)
> > > >>>         at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:452)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ~~~
> > > >>> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > > >>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > > >>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 5 December 2013 00:44, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > We do.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > 'Ant compile-gwt-dev' does exactly that.
> > > >>> > On 4 Dec 2013 23:26, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > > Thanks for the explanation/breakdown that's useful.
> > > >>> > > I'll still look into it, but it sounds like far too many to use
> a
> > > >>> > > dictionary. You'd end up with quite a mess.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Maybe just having a "development compile" without all the
> > > >>> permutations
> > > >>> > > would be better for now. I'll have a think though if decent
> > > >>> alternatives
> > > >>> > > come to mind.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > ~~~
> > > >>> > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > > >>> > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > > >>> > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > On 5 December 2013 00:07, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <
> > > >>> v...@ourproject.org
> > > >>> > > >wrote:
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > > El 04/12/13 23:55, Ali Lown escribió:
> > > >>> > > > > It looks for all the files to do with the spanish
> translation.
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > yes, I did for the two languages (with same result) ... but I
> > > copy
> > > >>> my
> > > >>> > > > last one command (the Spanish) :-P
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to