Here is my latest build log on win7. A Clean-Release Build Log<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FayOWBpVTVT036aX4XyzyAsxKqvS7sX8yY1v84wf6AE/edit?usp=drive_web>
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL >> Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" >> >> Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" phone >> number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine. >> After 5-6 hours its done. >> (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...) >> > What is the configuration of your PC? > > It took me 3 minutes 26 seconds to compile gwt. You can read more details > in a log for how I explored the build process on Linux Mint 13 - Making > of Start your own Wave in a Box - Google > Drive<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uFzLD6gyY-L5egbztn9FFJjoyWvf3uO3AYnJoSMiTis/edit#>. > And the slides, Start your own Wave in a Box - Google > Drive<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2KqC_h0cU_7Xpgfya8W2B2REkxb_YsQQWL5zBGE-ac/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000>. > Hope that will help. > [java] Compile of permutations succeeded > [java] Linking into /tmp/wave/war/webclient > [java] Link succeeded > [java] Compilation succeeded -- 204.776s > [touch] Creating /tmp/wave/build/dep/compile-gwt > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds > > >> >> Suggestion; >> Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up >> already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be unsuitable? >> > I can do that by creating a virtual box image, and exporting it as OVA > file - Open Virtualization Archive, the single-file version of an Open > Virtualization > Format<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Virtualization_Format>image. It'll > resemble my Linux Mint box. > > >> Query: >> Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or is >> there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't require >> handing over personal details to a company? > > You can have JDK7 to compile and run Wave in a Box. I guess the trick > should be that compiler compliance level must be 1.6. I used to be troubled > by the problem occasionally. I need to verify that. > > Now, I have both 7 and 6 on my Windows 7 box. > [image: Inline image 1] > > I have the runtime as Java 6. I don't know how I get such settings after > upgrading JRE and JDK several times, and removing obsolete versions. > [image: Inline image 2] > > However, my Ant is running on Java 7. I can have a clean-and-release build. > [image: Inline image 3] > > When I have Wave in a Box loaded in Eclipse, I have to make sure the > compiler compliance level to be 1.6. > [image: Inline image 5] > > Or else, I'll have a bunch of compile errors. > [image: Inline image 4] > > > > >> -- >> If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience here >> is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so then >> Apache vs Git. >> >> Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho hum. >> >> >> >> >> >> ~~~ >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> >> >> On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? seriously >_< >> > This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/ >> > *files it under "do tommorow" >> > >> > ~~~ >> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > >> > >> > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7 >> >> I'll downgrade. >> >> >> >> ~~~ >> >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Are you definitely using jdk6? >> >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to >> >>> edit/update >> >>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone >> getting >> >>> > started). >> >>> > --- >> >>> > Notes #4: >> >>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant. >> >>> > --- Stuck #4: >> >>> > Build error; >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml >> >>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log init: >> >>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] >> Created >> >>> dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: >> [javac] >> >>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto >> [javac] >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac >> >>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be >> >>> qualified by >> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] >> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error: >> >>> warnings >> >>> > found and -Werror specified [javac] >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav >> >>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be >> >>> qualified by >> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] >> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^ >> >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ... >> >>> > >> >>> > [javac] super.addAll(values, >> result.removedContributor_); >> >>> > [javac] ^ >> >>> > [javac] 1 error >> >>> > [javac] 40 warnings >> >>> > >> >>> > BUILD FAILED >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred >> while >> >>> > executing >> >>> > this line: >> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the >> >>> compiler >> >>> > error >> >>> > output for details. >> >>> > >> >>> > Total time: 12 seconds >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > ~~~ >> >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README file >> - >> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel < >> darkfl...@gmail.com> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Stuck #3: >> >>> > > > "ANT" >> >>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > check-test-dependencies: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > BUILD FAILED >> >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the >> >>> > > get-third-party >> >>> > > > targ >> >>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, i.e. >> >>> ant >> >>> > > > get-third-p >> >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > ~~~ >> >>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> >>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > > Note #2: >> >>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link to >> the >> >>> Java >> >>> > > > > site. (not just JRE). >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Note #3: >> >>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in XP >> just >> >>> by >> >>> > > > adding >> >>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable. >> >>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing PATH >> >>> system >> >>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory, the >> >>> \ant at >> >>> > > the >> >>> > > > > end shouldn't be there. >> >>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I have >> >>> write >> >>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as well, >> in >> >>> case >> >>> > I >> >>> > > > have >> >>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is treated >> >>> > > > differently) >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > ~~~ >> >>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> >>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the "wave" >> >>> > > directory >> >>> > > > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that doesn't exist >> now? >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> Yes. >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >
