On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" > > Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" phone > number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine. > After 5-6 hours its done. > (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...) > What is the configuration of your PC? It took me 3 minutes 26 seconds to compile gwt. You can read more details in a log for how I explored the build process on Linux Mint 13 - Making of Start your own Wave in a Box - Google Drive<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uFzLD6gyY-L5egbztn9FFJjoyWvf3uO3AYnJoSMiTis/edit#>. And the slides, Start your own Wave in a Box - Google Drive<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2KqC_h0cU_7Xpgfya8W2B2REkxb_YsQQWL5zBGE-ac/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000>. Hope that will help. [java] Compile of permutations succeeded [java] Linking into /tmp/wave/war/webclient [java] Link succeeded [java] Compilation succeeded -- 204.776s [touch] Creating /tmp/wave/build/dep/compile-gwt BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds > > Suggestion; > Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up > already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be unsuitable? > I can do that by creating a virtual box image, and exporting it as OVA file - Open Virtualization Archive, the single-file version of an Open Virtualization Format<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Virtualization_Format>image. It'll resemble my Linux Mint box. > Query: > Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or is > there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't require > handing over personal details to a company? You can have JDK7 to compile and run Wave in a Box. I guess the trick should be that compiler compliance level must be 1.6. I used to be troubled by the problem occasionally. I need to verify that. Now, I have both 7 and 6 on my Windows 7 box. [image: Inline image 1] I have the runtime as Java 6. I don't know how I get such settings after upgrading JRE and JDK several times, and removing obsolete versions. [image: Inline image 2] However, my Ant is running on Java 7. I can have a clean-and-release build. [image: Inline image 3] When I have Wave in a Box loaded in Eclipse, I have to make sure the compiler compliance level to be 1.6. [image: Inline image 5] Or else, I'll have a bunch of compile errors. [image: Inline image 4] > -- > If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience here > is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so then > Apache vs Git. > > Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho hum. > > > > > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? seriously >_< > > This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/ > > *files it under "do tommorow" > > > > ~~~ > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > > > > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7 > >> I'll downgrade. > >> > >> ~~~ > >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >> > >> > >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> > >>> Are you definitely using jdk6? > >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to > >>> edit/update > >>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone > getting > >>> > started). > >>> > --- > >>> > Notes #4: > >>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant. > >>> > --- Stuck #4: > >>> > Build error; > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml > >>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log init: > >>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] Created > >>> dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: > [javac] > >>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [javac] > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac > >>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be > >>> qualified by > >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] > >>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error: > >>> warnings > >>> > found and -Werror specified [javac] > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav > >>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be > >>> qualified by > >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] > >>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^ > >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ... > >>> > > >>> > [javac] super.addAll(values, result.removedContributor_); > >>> > [javac] ^ > >>> > [javac] 1 error > >>> > [javac] 40 warnings > >>> > > >>> > BUILD FAILED > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred > while > >>> > executing > >>> > this line: > >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the > >>> compiler > >>> > error > >>> > output for details. > >>> > > >>> > Total time: 12 seconds > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > ~~~ > >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README file - > >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com > > > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > Stuck #3: > >>> > > > "ANT" > >>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml > >>> > > > > >>> > > > check-test-dependencies: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > BUILD FAILED > >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the > >>> > > get-third-party > >>> > > > targ > >>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, i.e. > >>> ant > >>> > > > get-third-p > >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > ~~~ > >>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Note #2: > >>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link to > the > >>> Java > >>> > > > > site. (not just JRE). > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Note #3: > >>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in XP > just > >>> by > >>> > > > adding > >>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable. > >>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing PATH > >>> system > >>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory, the > >>> \ant at > >>> > > the > >>> > > > > end shouldn't be there. > >>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok. > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I have > >>> write > >>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as well, in > >>> case > >>> > I > >>> > > > have > >>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is treated > >>> > > > differently) > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > ~~~ > >>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the "wave" > >>> > > directory > >>> > > > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that doesn't exist now? > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> Yes. > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >
