oh, it already has Eclipse stuff. *smacks head* thought that had to be built separately first before it would be ready. Thanks.
regarding compile times; I'll see how fast the GWT stuff compiles on its own, as mentioned earlier I think the majority of my 5 hour build was for the server stuff, not the client. If the problem is somehow specific to me - either due to my XP, or the 2Gig or ram, or something else about my system, then its not worth worrying much. If the problem is likely to effect others though, we should look into it, either a fix, or the virtual machine as an option. The quicker people can dive into the code, the less likely they are to lose their enthusiasm before they even start ;) ~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 5 December 2013 10:23, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you get the source code from https://github.com/apache/wave, I'd > suggest to import Wave in a Box directly as an existing Eclipse project. > [image: Inline image 1] > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is there a command for serverstuff+gwt-dev ? As I think that would be >> useful to recommend in the guide, rather then the full serverstuff+32 >> permutations. (yet you don't just want "compile-gwt-dev" either, as I >> assume that's without ant server stuff). >> -- >> Stuck#4: >> How do I currently get it setup for Eclipse? >> >> The old guide says; >> >> ant eclipse >> >> Will give me the project files needed, but this gives me an error; >> >> C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:79: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: >> Cannot r >> un program "tools\eclipse.sh": CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a valid >> Win32 >> application >> at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:470) >> at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute$Java13CommandLauncher.exec(Exec >> ute.java:827) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.launch(Execute.java:445) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.execute(Execute.java:459) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExecute(ExecTask.java:635) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExec(ExecTask.java:676) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.execute(ExecTask.java:502) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) >> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source) >> at >> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces >> sorImpl.java:25) >> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.jav >> a:106) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:390) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:411) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1360) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1329) >> at >> org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExe >> cutor.java:41) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1212) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:801) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:218) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:280) >> at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:109) >> Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a valid >> Win32 >> application >> at java.lang.ProcessImpl.create(Native Method) >> at java.lang.ProcessImpl.<init>(ProcessImpl.java:177) >> at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:28) >> at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:452) >> >> >> >> >> >> ~~~ >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> >> >> On 5 December 2013 00:44, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >> > We do. >> > >> > 'Ant compile-gwt-dev' does exactly that. >> > On 4 Dec 2013 23:26, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks for the explanation/breakdown that's useful. >> > > I'll still look into it, but it sounds like far too many to use a >> > > dictionary. You'd end up with quite a mess. >> > > >> > > Maybe just having a "development compile" without all the permutations >> > > would be better for now. I'll have a think though if decent >> alternatives >> > > come to mind. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ~~~ >> > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > > >> > > >> > > On 5 December 2013 00:07, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <v...@ourproject.org >> > > >wrote: >> > > >> > > > El 04/12/13 23:55, Ali Lown escribió: >> > > > > It looks for all the files to do with the spanish translation. >> > > > >> > > > yes, I did for the two languages (with same result) ... but I copy >> my >> > > > last one command (the Spanish) :-P >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
