Here is the OVA ready for downloading. wave-dev-on-cinnamon.ova<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_OYKagpJexmdG5QYzhZeC1QNTg/edit?usp=drive_web>
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Fleeky Flanco <fle...@gmail.com> wrote: > frank, > > thats pretty awesome, my only question is why you used LM 13 and not say a > debian cmd line only distro? > Because, it would be a development box with JDK, Ant, Eclipse, Solr, and source code preinstalled and ready to use, i.e. ready for a developer to start in a matter of seconds. It's for you to start playing with the code, rather than simply a demo server. > > either way nice work :) > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I've created a vm. Now, I'm uploading it to Google Drive for sharing. > > > > Here is the log of how I made it. > > wave-dev-on-cinnamon< > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iGFLmAzi3SaEH0J6SNlaq6wubesRWlO2A8bvqxPp-p4/edit?usp=drive_web > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL > >>> Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" > >>> > >>> Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" > >>> phone > >>> number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine. > >>> After 5-6 hours its done. > >>> (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...) > >>> > >> What is the configuration of your PC? > >> > >> It took me 3 minutes 26 seconds to compile gwt. You can read more > details > >> in a log for how I explored the build process on Linux Mint 13 - Making > >> of Start your own Wave in a Box - Google Drive< > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uFzLD6gyY-L5egbztn9FFJjoyWvf3uO3AYnJoSMiTis/edit# > >. > >> And the slides, Start your own Wave in a Box - Google Drive< > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2KqC_h0cU_7Xpgfya8W2B2REkxb_YsQQWL5zBGE-ac/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000 > >. > >> Hope that will help. > >> [java] Compile of permutations succeeded > >> [java] Linking into /tmp/wave/war/webclient > >> [java] Link succeeded > >> [java] Compilation succeeded -- 204.776s > >> [touch] Creating /tmp/wave/build/dep/compile-gwt > >> > >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL > >> Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Suggestion; > >>> Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up > >>> already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be > unsuitable? > >>> > >> I can do that by creating a virtual box image, and exporting it as OVA > >> file - Open Virtualization Archive, the single-file version of an Open > >> Virtualization Format< > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Virtualization_Format>image. It'll > resemble my Linux Mint box. > >> > >> > >>> Query: > >>> Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or > is > >>> there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't > >>> require > >>> handing over personal details to a company? > >> > >> You can have JDK7 to compile and run Wave in a Box. I guess the trick > >> should be that compiler compliance level must be 1.6. I used to be > troubled > >> by the problem occasionally. I need to verify that. > >> > >> Now, I have both 7 and 6 on my Windows 7 box. > >> [image: Inline image 1] > >> > >> I have the runtime as Java 6. I don't know how I get such settings after > >> upgrading JRE and JDK several times, and removing obsolete versions. > >> [image: Inline image 2] > >> > >> However, my Ant is running on Java 7. I can have a clean-and-release > >> build. > >> [image: Inline image 3] > >> > >> When I have Wave in a Box loaded in Eclipse, I have to make sure the > >> compiler compliance level to be 1.6. > >> [image: Inline image 5] > >> > >> Or else, I'll have a bunch of compile errors. > >> [image: Inline image 4] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> -- > >>> If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience > >>> here > >>> is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so > >>> then > >>> Apache vs Git. > >>> > >>> Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho hum. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ~~~ > >>> Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? seriously > >>> >_< > >>> > This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/ > >>> > *files it under "do tommorow" > >>> > > >>> > ~~~ > >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7 > >>> >> I'll downgrade. > >>> >> > >>> >> ~~~ > >>> >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >>> Are you definitely using jdk6? > >>> >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to > >>> >>> edit/update > >>> >>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone > >>> getting > >>> >>> > started). > >>> >>> > --- > >>> >>> > Notes #4: > >>> >>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant. > >>> >>> > --- Stuck #4: > >>> >>> > Build error; > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml > >>> >>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log > >>> init: > >>> >>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] > >>> Created > >>> >>> dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: > >>> [javac] > >>> >>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto > >>> [javac] > >>> >>> > > >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac > >>> >>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be > >>> >>> qualified by > >>> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] > >>> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] > error: > >>> >>> warnings > >>> >>> > found and -Werror specified [javac] > >>> >>> > > >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav > >>> >>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be > >>> >>> qualified by > >>> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] > >>> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^ > >>> >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ... > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > [javac] super.addAll(values, > >>> result.removedContributor_); > >>> >>> > [javac] ^ > >>> >>> > [javac] 1 error > >>> >>> > [javac] 40 warnings > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > BUILD FAILED > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred > >>> while > >>> >>> > executing > >>> >>> > this line: > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the > >>> >>> compiler > >>> >>> > error > >>> >>> > output for details. > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > Total time: 12 seconds > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > ~~~ > >>> >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README > >>> file - > >>> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel < > >>> darkfl...@gmail.com> > >>> >>> > wrote: > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > Stuck #3: > >>> >>> > > > "ANT" > >>> >>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > check-test-dependencies: > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > BUILD FAILED > >>> >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the > >>> >>> > > get-third-party > >>> >>> > > > targ > >>> >>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, > >>> i.e. > >>> >>> ant > >>> >>> > > > get-third-p > >>> >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > ~~~ > >>> >>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> >>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com > > > >>> >>> wrote: > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note #2: > >>> >>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link > to > >>> the > >>> >>> Java > >>> >>> > > > > site. (not just JRE). > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note #3: > >>> >>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in XP > >>> just > >>> >>> by > >>> >>> > > > adding > >>> >>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable. > >>> >>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing > PATH > >>> >>> system > >>> >>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory, > the > >>> >>> \ant at > >>> >>> > > the > >>> >>> > > > > end shouldn't be there. > >>> >>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok. > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I > have > >>> >>> write > >>> >>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as > well, > >>> in > >>> >>> case > >>> >>> > I > >>> >>> > > > have > >>> >>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is > treated > >>> >>> > > > differently) > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > ~~~ > >>> >>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> >>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the > >>> "wave" > >>> >>> > > directory > >>> >>> > > > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that doesn't exist > >>> now? > >>> >>> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > > >> Yes. > >>> >>> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >
