If you get the source code from https://github.com/apache/wave, I'd suggest
to import Wave in a Box directly as an existing Eclipse project.
[image: Inline image 1]


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there a command for serverstuff+gwt-dev ? As I think that would be
> useful to recommend in the guide, rather then the full serverstuff+32
> permutations.  (yet you don't just want "compile-gwt-dev" either, as I
> assume that's without ant server stuff).
> --
> Stuck#4:
> How do I currently get it setup for Eclipse?
>
> The old guide says;
>
> ant eclipse
>
> Will give me the project files needed, but this gives me an error;
>
> C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:79: Execute failed: java.io.IOException:
> Cannot r
> un program "tools\eclipse.sh": CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a valid
> Win32
> application
>         at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:470)
>         at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593)
>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute$Java13CommandLauncher.exec(Exec
> ute.java:827)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.launch(Execute.java:445)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.execute(Execute.java:459)
>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExecute(ExecTask.java:635)
>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExec(ExecTask.java:676)
>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.execute(ExecTask.java:502)
>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291)
>         at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source)
>         at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
> sorImpl.java:25)
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.jav
> a:106)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:390)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:411)
>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1360)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1329)
>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExe
> cutor.java:41)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1212)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:801)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:218)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:280)
>         at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:109)
> Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a valid
> Win32
>  application
>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.create(Native Method)
>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.<init>(ProcessImpl.java:177)
>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:28)
>         at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:452)
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 5 December 2013 00:44, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > We do.
> >
> > 'Ant compile-gwt-dev' does exactly that.
> > On 4 Dec 2013 23:26, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the explanation/breakdown that's useful.
> > > I'll still look into it, but it sounds like far too many to use a
> > > dictionary. You'd end up with quite a mess.
> > >
> > > Maybe just having a "development compile" without all the permutations
> > > would be better for now. I'll have a think though if decent
> alternatives
> > > come to mind.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ~~~
> > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5 December 2013 00:07, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <v...@ourproject.org
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > El 04/12/13 23:55, Ali Lown escribió:
> > > > > It looks for all the files to do with the spanish translation.
> > > >
> > > > yes, I did for the two languages (with same result) ... but I copy my
> > > > last one command (the Spanish) :-P
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to