> > *Told it it was a gwt project (not 100% sure thats correct, as only part of > its gwt...seems to work though)
Don't do that. I don't think it's a standard GWT project in the SDK point of view. That's why you got the two errors. On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Note#: > *Imported as existing project into eclipse. > *Told it it was a gwt project (not 100% sure thats correct, as only part of > its gwt...seems to work though) > *2 errors; > -The GWT SDK JAR gwt-servlet.jar is missing in the WEB-INF/lib directory > -The web.xml file does not exist WEB-INF /wave/war > However, I assume these can be ignored as we arnt using gwt for any of the > server stuff are we? > *2404 warnings...but thats normal for a project of this size ;) > > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > On 5 December 2013 12:57, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > oh, it already has Eclipse stuff. *smacks head* thought that had to be > > built separately first before it would be ready. > > Thanks. > > > > regarding compile times; I'll see how fast the GWT stuff compiles on its > > own, as mentioned earlier I think the majority of my 5 hour build was for > > the server stuff, not the client. > > If the problem is somehow specific to me - either due to my XP, or the > > 2Gig or ram, or something else about my system, then its not worth > worrying > > much. > > If the problem is likely to effect others though, we should look into it, > > either a fix, or the virtual machine as an option. > > The quicker people can dive into the code, the less likely they are to > > lose their enthusiasm before they even start ;) > > > > > > > > > > ~~~ > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > > > > On 5 December 2013 10:23, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> If you get the source code from https://github.com/apache/wave, I'd > >> suggest to import Wave in a Box directly as an existing Eclipse project. > >> [image: Inline image 1] > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> Is there a command for serverstuff+gwt-dev ? As I think that would be > >>> useful to recommend in the guide, rather then the full serverstuff+32 > >>> permutations. (yet you don't just want "compile-gwt-dev" either, as I > >>> assume that's without ant server stuff). > >>> -- > >>> Stuck#4: > >>> How do I currently get it setup for Eclipse? > >>> > >>> The old guide says; > >>> > >>> ant eclipse > >>> > >>> Will give me the project files needed, but this gives me an error; > >>> > >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:79: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: > >>> Cannot r > >>> un program "tools\eclipse.sh": CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a > valid > >>> Win32 > >>> application > >>> at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:470) > >>> at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute$Java13CommandLauncher.exec(Exec > >>> ute.java:827) > >>> at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.launch(Execute.java:445) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.execute(Execute.java:459) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExecute(ExecTask.java:635) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExec(ExecTask.java:676) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.execute(ExecTask.java:502) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) > >>> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source) > >>> at > >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces > >>> sorImpl.java:25) > >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.jav > >>> a:106) > >>> at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348) > >>> at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:390) > >>> at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:411) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1360) > >>> at > org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1329) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExe > >>> cutor.java:41) > >>> at > org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1212) > >>> at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:801) > >>> at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:218) > >>> at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:280) > >>> at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:109) > >>> Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a > >>> valid > >>> Win32 > >>> application > >>> at java.lang.ProcessImpl.create(Native Method) > >>> at java.lang.ProcessImpl.<init>(ProcessImpl.java:177) > >>> at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:28) > >>> at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:452) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ~~~ > >>> Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> > >>> > >>> On 5 December 2013 00:44, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>> > >>> > We do. > >>> > > >>> > 'Ant compile-gwt-dev' does exactly that. > >>> > On 4 Dec 2013 23:26, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks for the explanation/breakdown that's useful. > >>> > > I'll still look into it, but it sounds like far too many to use a > >>> > > dictionary. You'd end up with quite a mess. > >>> > > > >>> > > Maybe just having a "development compile" without all the > >>> permutations > >>> > > would be better for now. I'll have a think though if decent > >>> alternatives > >>> > > come to mind. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > ~~~ > >>> > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >>> > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >>> > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On 5 December 2013 00:07, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado < > >>> v...@ourproject.org > >>> > > >wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > El 04/12/13 23:55, Ali Lown escribió: > >>> > > > > It looks for all the files to do with the spanish translation. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > yes, I did for the two languages (with same result) ... but I > copy > >>> my > >>> > > > last one command (the Spanish) :-P > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > >
