(sorry if I am being a bother with all this - I could probably work a lot of this out on my own eventually, but Id rather spend time trying to permanently make it all easier, or learning how to contribute to the client myself)
~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 5 December 2013 00:54, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there a command for serverstuff+gwt-dev ? As I think that would be > useful to recommend in the guide, rather then the full serverstuff+32 > permutations. (yet you don't just want "compile-gwt-dev" either, as I > assume that's without ant server stuff). > -- > Stuck#4: > How do I currently get it setup for Eclipse? > > The old guide says; > > ant eclipse > > Will give me the project files needed, but this gives me an error; > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:79: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: > Cannot r > un program "tools\eclipse.sh": CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a valid > Win32 > application > at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:470) > at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute$Java13CommandLauncher.exec(Exec > ute.java:827) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.launch(Execute.java:445) > at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.execute(Execute.java:459) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExecute(ExecTask.java:635) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExec(ExecTask.java:676) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.execute(ExecTask.java:502) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291) > at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces > sorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.jav > a:106) > at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348) > at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:390) > at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:411) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1360) > at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1329) > at > org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExe > cutor.java:41) > at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1212) > at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:801) > at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:218) > at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:280) > at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:109) > Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a valid > Win32 > application > at java.lang.ProcessImpl.create(Native Method) > at java.lang.ProcessImpl.<init>(ProcessImpl.java:177) > at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:28) > at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:452) > > > > > > ~~~ > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > > On 5 December 2013 00:44, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> We do. >> >> 'Ant compile-gwt-dev' does exactly that. >> On 4 Dec 2013 23:26, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thanks for the explanation/breakdown that's useful. >> > I'll still look into it, but it sounds like far too many to use a >> > dictionary. You'd end up with quite a mess. >> > >> > Maybe just having a "development compile" without all the permutations >> > would be better for now. I'll have a think though if decent alternatives >> > come to mind. >> > >> > >> > >> > ~~~ >> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >> > >> > >> > On 5 December 2013 00:07, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <v...@ourproject.org >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > El 04/12/13 23:55, Ali Lown escribió: >> > > > It looks for all the files to do with the spanish translation. >> > > >> > > yes, I did for the two languages (with same result) ... but I copy my >> > > last one command (the Spanish) :-P >> > > >> > >> > >
