frank, thats pretty awesome, my only question is why you used LM 13 and not say a debian cmd line only distro?
either way nice work :) On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've created a vm. Now, I'm uploading it to Google Drive for sharing. > > Here is the log of how I made it. > > wave-dev-on-cinnamon<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iGFLmAzi3SaEH0J6SNlaq6wubesRWlO2A8bvqxPp-p4/edit?usp=drive_web> > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL >>> Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" >>> >>> Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" >>> phone >>> number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine. >>> After 5-6 hours its done. >>> (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...) >>> >> What is the configuration of your PC? >> >> It took me 3 minutes 26 seconds to compile gwt. You can read more details >> in a log for how I explored the build process on Linux Mint 13 - Making >> of Start your own Wave in a Box - Google >> Drive<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uFzLD6gyY-L5egbztn9FFJjoyWvf3uO3AYnJoSMiTis/edit#>. >> And the slides, Start your own Wave in a Box - Google >> Drive<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2KqC_h0cU_7Xpgfya8W2B2REkxb_YsQQWL5zBGE-ac/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000>. >> Hope that will help. >> [java] Compile of permutations succeeded >> [java] Linking into /tmp/wave/war/webclient >> [java] Link succeeded >> [java] Compilation succeeded -- 204.776s >> [touch] Creating /tmp/wave/build/dep/compile-gwt >> >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >> Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds >> >> >>> >>> Suggestion; >>> Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up >>> already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be unsuitable? >>> >> I can do that by creating a virtual box image, and exporting it as OVA >> file - Open Virtualization Archive, the single-file version of an Open >> Virtualization >> Format<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Virtualization_Format>image. It'll >> resemble my Linux Mint box. >> >> >>> Query: >>> Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or is >>> there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't >>> require >>> handing over personal details to a company? >> >> You can have JDK7 to compile and run Wave in a Box. I guess the trick >> should be that compiler compliance level must be 1.6. I used to be troubled >> by the problem occasionally. I need to verify that. >> >> Now, I have both 7 and 6 on my Windows 7 box. >> [image: Inline image 1] >> >> I have the runtime as Java 6. I don't know how I get such settings after >> upgrading JRE and JDK several times, and removing obsolete versions. >> [image: Inline image 2] >> >> However, my Ant is running on Java 7. I can have a clean-and-release >> build. >> [image: Inline image 3] >> >> When I have Wave in a Box loaded in Eclipse, I have to make sure the >> compiler compliance level to be 1.6. >> [image: Inline image 5] >> >> Or else, I'll have a bunch of compile errors. >> [image: Inline image 4] >> >> >> >> >>> -- >>> If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience >>> here >>> is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so >>> then >>> Apache vs Git. >>> >>> Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho hum. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> >>> >>> On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? seriously >>> >_< >>> > This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/ >>> > *files it under "do tommorow" >>> > >>> > ~~~ >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> > >>> > >>> > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7 >>> >> I'll downgrade. >>> >> >>> >> ~~~ >>> >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Are you definitely using jdk6? >>> >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to >>> >>> edit/update >>> >>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone >>> getting >>> >>> > started). >>> >>> > --- >>> >>> > Notes #4: >>> >>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant. >>> >>> > --- Stuck #4: >>> >>> > Build error; >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml >>> >>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log >>> init: >>> >>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] >>> Created >>> >>> dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: >>> [javac] >>> >>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto >>> [javac] >>> >>> > >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac >>> >>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be >>> >>> qualified by >>> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] >>> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error: >>> >>> warnings >>> >>> > found and -Werror specified [javac] >>> >>> > >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav >>> >>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be >>> >>> qualified by >>> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] >>> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^ >>> >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ... >>> >>> > >>> >>> > [javac] super.addAll(values, >>> result.removedContributor_); >>> >>> > [javac] ^ >>> >>> > [javac] 1 error >>> >>> > [javac] 40 warnings >>> >>> > >>> >>> > BUILD FAILED >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred >>> while >>> >>> > executing >>> >>> > this line: >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the >>> >>> compiler >>> >>> > error >>> >>> > output for details. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Total time: 12 seconds >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > ~~~ >>> >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README >>> file - >>> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel < >>> darkfl...@gmail.com> >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > > Stuck #3: >>> >>> > > > "ANT" >>> >>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > check-test-dependencies: >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > BUILD FAILED >>> >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the >>> >>> > > get-third-party >>> >>> > > > targ >>> >>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, >>> i.e. >>> >>> ant >>> >>> > > > get-third-p >>> >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > ~~~ >>> >>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> >>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note #2: >>> >>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link to >>> the >>> >>> Java >>> >>> > > > > site. (not just JRE). >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note #3: >>> >>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in XP >>> just >>> >>> by >>> >>> > > > adding >>> >>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable. >>> >>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing PATH >>> >>> system >>> >>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory, the >>> >>> \ant at >>> >>> > > the >>> >>> > > > > end shouldn't be there. >>> >>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok. >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I have >>> >>> write >>> >>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as well, >>> in >>> >>> case >>> >>> > I >>> >>> > > > have >>> >>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is treated >>> >>> > > > differently) >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > ~~~ >>> >>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: >>> >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html >>> >>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the >>> "wave" >>> >>> > > directory >>> >>> > > > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that doesn't exist >>> now? >>> >>> > > > >> >>> >>> > > > >> Yes. >>> >>> > > > >> >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >
