Fantastic work there. For the moment, I am going to continue trying to set it up properly - and making notes to update/clarify the guide as appropriate, but its good to have that as a fallback.
Currently still trying to get the client running; >>you need to create a debug/run configuration with arguments set properly. >>you can find the arguments by reading run.sh I assume you mean "run-server.sh" (or-import or -export). I don't see just a "run.sh". Then again, I couldn't find any obvious arguments for the client in those files either. If anyone here is using eclipse could give me a screenshot of their run settings? Alternatively, just let me know what the html file is the webclient is supposed to be using as thats what it doesnt seem to know. Overall.html? Index.html? frame.html? ~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 7 December 2013 12:25, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is the OVA ready for downloading. > wave-dev-on-cinnamon.ova< > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_OYKagpJexmdG5QYzhZeC1QNTg/edit?usp=drive_web > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Fleeky Flanco <fle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > frank, > > > > thats pretty awesome, my only question is why you used LM 13 and not say > a > > debian cmd line only distro? > > > Because, it would be a development box with JDK, Ant, Eclipse, Solr, and > source code preinstalled and ready to use, i.e. ready for a developer to > start in a matter of seconds. It's for you to start playing with the code, > rather than simply a demo server. > > > > > > either way nice work :) > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I've created a vm. Now, I'm uploading it to Google Drive for sharing. > > > > > > Here is the log of how I made it. > > > wave-dev-on-cinnamon< > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iGFLmAzi3SaEH0J6SNlaq6wubesRWlO2A8bvqxPp-p4/edit?usp=drive_web > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Frank R. <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > >> > > >>> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL > > >>> Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds" > > >>> > > >>> Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" > > >>> phone > > >>> number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine. > > >>> After 5-6 hours its done. > > >>> (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...) > > >>> > > >> What is the configuration of your PC? > > >> > > >> It took me 3 minutes 26 seconds to compile gwt. You can read more > > details > > >> in a log for how I explored the build process on Linux Mint 13 - > Making > > >> of Start your own Wave in a Box - Google Drive< > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uFzLD6gyY-L5egbztn9FFJjoyWvf3uO3AYnJoSMiTis/edit# > > >. > > >> And the slides, Start your own Wave in a Box - Google Drive< > > > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2KqC_h0cU_7Xpgfya8W2B2REkxb_YsQQWL5zBGE-ac/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000 > > >. > > >> Hope that will help. > > >> [java] Compile of permutations succeeded > > >> [java] Linking into /tmp/wave/war/webclient > > >> [java] Link succeeded > > >> [java] Compilation succeeded -- 204.776s > > >> [touch] Creating /tmp/wave/build/dep/compile-gwt > > >> > > >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL > > >> Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Suggestion; > > >>> Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up > > >>> already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be > > unsuitable? > > >>> > > >> I can do that by creating a virtual box image, and exporting it as OVA > > >> file - Open Virtualization Archive, the single-file version of an Open > > >> Virtualization Format< > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Virtualization_Format>image. It'll > > resemble my Linux Mint box. > > >> > > >> > > >>> Query: > > >>> Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or > > is > > >>> there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't > > >>> require > > >>> handing over personal details to a company? > > >> > > >> You can have JDK7 to compile and run Wave in a Box. I guess the trick > > >> should be that compiler compliance level must be 1.6. I used to be > > troubled > > >> by the problem occasionally. I need to verify that. > > >> > > >> Now, I have both 7 and 6 on my Windows 7 box. > > >> [image: Inline image 1] > > >> > > >> I have the runtime as Java 6. I don't know how I get such settings > after > > >> upgrading JRE and JDK several times, and removing obsolete versions. > > >> [image: Inline image 2] > > >> > > >> However, my Ant is running on Java 7. I can have a clean-and-release > > >> build. > > >> [image: Inline image 3] > > >> > > >> When I have Wave in a Box loaded in Eclipse, I have to make sure the > > >> compiler compliance level to be 1.6. > > >> [image: Inline image 5] > > >> > > >> Or else, I'll have a bunch of compile errors. > > >> [image: Inline image 4] > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> -- > > >>> If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience > > >>> here > > >>> is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so > > >>> then > > >>> Apache vs Git. > > >>> > > >>> Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho > hum. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ~~~ > > >>> Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > >>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > >>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? > seriously > > >>> >_< > > >>> > This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/ > > >>> > *files it under "do tommorow" > > >>> > > > >>> > ~~~ > > >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> >> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7 > > >>> >> I'll downgrade. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> ~~~ > > >>> >> Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > >>> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > >>> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > >>> >> > > >>> >>> Are you definitely using jdk6? > > >>> >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to > > >>> >>> edit/update > > >>> >>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone > > >>> getting > > >>> >>> > started). > > >>> >>> > --- > > >>> >>> > Notes #4: > > >>> >>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant. > > >>> >>> > --- Stuck #4: > > >>> >>> > Build error; > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml > > >>> >>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log > > >>> init: > > >>> >>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] > > >>> Created > > >>> >>> dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: > > >>> [javac] > > >>> >>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto > > >>> [javac] > > >>> >>> > > > >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac > > >>> >>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be > > >>> >>> qualified by > > >>> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] > > >>> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] > > error: > > >>> >>> warnings > > >>> >>> > found and -Werror specified [javac] > > >>> >>> > > > >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav > > >>> >>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be > > >>> >>> qualified by > > >>> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac] > > >>> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^ > > >>> >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ... > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > [javac] super.addAll(values, > > >>> result.removedContributor_); > > >>> >>> > [javac] ^ > > >>> >>> > [javac] 1 error > > >>> >>> > [javac] 40 warnings > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > BUILD FAILED > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error > occurred > > >>> while > > >>> >>> > executing > > >>> >>> > this line: > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see > the > > >>> >>> compiler > > >>> >>> > error > > >>> >>> > output for details. > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > Total time: 12 seconds > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > ~~~ > > >>> >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > >>> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > >>> >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README > > >>> file - > > >>> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel < > > >>> darkfl...@gmail.com> > > >>> >>> > wrote: > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > Stuck #3: > > >>> >>> > > > "ANT" > > >>> >>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > check-test-dependencies: > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > BUILD FAILED > > >>> >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the > > >>> >>> > > get-third-party > > >>> >>> > > > targ > > >>> >>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, > > >>> i.e. > > >>> >>> ant > > >>> >>> > > > get-third-p > > >>> >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > ~~~ > > >>> >>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > >>> >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > >>> >>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel < > darkfl...@gmail.com > > > > > >>> >>> wrote: > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note #2: > > >>> >>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link > > to > > >>> the > > >>> >>> Java > > >>> >>> > > > > site. (not just JRE). > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note #3: > > >>> >>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in > XP > > >>> just > > >>> >>> by > > >>> >>> > > > adding > > >>> >>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable. > > >>> >>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing > > PATH > > >>> >>> system > > >>> >>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory, > > the > > >>> >>> \ant at > > >>> >>> > > the > > >>> >>> > > > > end shouldn't be there. > > >>> >>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok. > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I > > have > > >>> >>> write > > >>> >>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as > > well, > > >>> in > > >>> >>> case > > >>> >>> > I > > >>> >>> > > > have > > >>> >>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is > > treated > > >>> >>> > > > differently) > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > ~~~ > > >>> >>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > > >>> >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > > >>> >>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > wrote: > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is the > > >>> "wave" > > >>> >>> > > directory > > >>> >>> > > > >> > rather then the "wave-protocol" one that doesn't > exist > > >>> now? > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > >>> >>> > > > >> Yes. > > >>> >>> > > > >> > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
