Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - shop=anime (was: shop=anime_stuff)

Citeren "S.Higashi" : Hi ergo, I researched Akihabara,Tokyo lasy sunday^_^ There are many anime shops and hard to categorize. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Anime01_video.jpg http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Anime02_manga.jpg http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Anime03_cos

Re: [Tagging] designated bike lane

Google's measurement tool? Waar kan ik die vinden en hoe werkt deze? -Robert- Citeren j...@jfeldredge.com: Two feet wide is about what I had estimated by looking at the photograph, which is why I commented that the bicycle might fit into the bike lane, but part of the rider would

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sluice_gate

+1 Very agree. -Robert- Citeren Steve Bennett : On 4/01/2011 7:20 AM, Paul Norman wrote: They both have elements of flow control, but function in quite different ways and look very different. A weir is used to raise the water level or control flow, with water flowing over the top. A

Re: [Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys

more clear and Ways new tags has to formatted will be obvious. -Robert- Citeren M?rtin Koppenhoefer : 2011/1/1 Robert Elsenaar : - Where should I go to find the ultimate list of approved tags? There is this page and category: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Approved_features http://wi

Re: [Tagging] Equivalence relation (was: Re: Differences in cycleways)

It was also not my idea to use relations to combine different road objects to one road 'relation'. -Robert- Citeren Richard Mann : On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:  On 11/01/2011 12:20 AM, Richard Mann wrote: The user who'd prefer to use highwa

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - winter_road/ice_road

road has a certain tracktype. tracktype=2 tracktype:opening_hours=oct-apr. -robert- Citeren Gleb Smirnoff : Hello! Previous voting showed that a minor number of interested in this feature mappers disagree with the surface= tag. In respect to them, the proposal was redone, to use the

Re: [Tagging] new key civilization

+1 This is a nice and very clear solution. I like subtags more and more. It's a kind of Advanced Tagging. -Robert- Citeren Daniel Sabo : For clarity, could these be subtags of historic? e.g. historic=ruins historic:civilization=roman historic:period=aurelia That way we can have

Re: [Tagging] RFC: historic:civilization and historic:period Re:new key civilization

Why: fortification_type=hill_fort Better is: fortification:type=hill_fort -Robert- Citeren Johan Jönsson : Ulf Lamping writes: In practice, lot's of sites have *several* different "roots" throughout the ages. A castle may be build in early medieval ages, continuously exte

Re: [Tagging] RFC: historic:civilization and historic:period Re:new key civilization

ion, but also on e.g. museum (wild guess). (And I think I already saw the sub tag came by: tree:type ?) -Robert- Citeren M?rtin Koppenhoefer : 2011/1/13 : Why: fortification_type=hill_fort Better is: fortification:type=hill_fort where do you get this idea from? There are 289 fortific

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Scuba diving (Shop or spot)

Citeren John Smith : On 19 January 2011 04:27, Robert Elsenaar wrote: (scuba_diving is better then Dive_centre because also dive spots can have filling facilities without having a divecentre nearby.) My point before is that scuba is only one type of diving, you can also snorkle or use a

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Metropolis

the adminstatative or the prominence rank to build up there map. -robert- Citeren Steve Bennett : On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:27 PM, John Smith wrote: The problem here is subject v objective tagging, in terms of airports this can be objective stated based on international flights a day and the same w

Re: [Tagging] network tag on route relations

On 12/07/2020 15:48, Mike Thompson wrote: > Hello, > > According to the wiki[0], it seems that the network tag has different > meanings and possible values based upon if it is applied to a route > relation where route=road vs. route=bicycle/mtb/foot/etc. > > If I am understanding this correctly,

Re: [Tagging] network tag on route relations

On 12/07/2020 22:50, Mike Thompson wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:49 AM Robert Skedgell <mailto:r...@hubris.org.uk>> wrote: > >> >> The very short NCN route 425 in south-east London is network=ncn because >> it's a Sustrans route. THe scope

[Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

er neutral term, but in reality it has been adapted that way due to past practices of gender bias. Regardless of the outcome of this proposal, this is a worthy discussion to be had in my mind. Looking forward to your feedback Yours, Robert Delm

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

; sent from a phone > > > On 15. Oct 2020, at 02:57, Robert Delmenico wrote: > > > > I also understand that generally speaking the use of man_made is > commonly accepted as a gender neutral term, but in reality it has been > adapted that way due to past practices of gender

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

Some great points here. Good to hear the points of views of all of you. Look forward to hearing more feedback. Kind regards, Rob On Mon, 19 Oct 2020, 9:19 am Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > > Thanks everyone - all makes sense! > > Graeme > > > > ___ > T

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

Nice investigating Nathan, I would be open to using artificial instead of human_made. Would it be best to change the proposal or start a second proposal? Change man_made= to artificial= Rob On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 21:14, nathan case wrote: > Pros and cons aside, “human-made” is not a term th

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

I originally put the call out really to gauge if there was much interest in changing the term man_made because of its use of 'man', and was interested in hearing the thoughts from other mappers as really this proposal isn't just mine. If there was no interest I would just abandon it and move on - t

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

0, 1:39 am Robert Delmenico, wrote: > > I originally put the call out really to gauge if there was much interest > in changing the term man_made because of its use of 'man', and was > interested in hearing the thoughts from other mappers as really this > proposal isn't jus

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

.com/amp/english/man-made 'As I mentioned in another email, we do use terms such as midwife.' Midwife actually translates as 'with woman'. The wife part relates to the person giving birth. On Tue, 20 Oct 2020, 8:44 am Niels Elgaard Larsen, wrote: > Robert Delmenico:

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

Perhaps the use of man_made could be dropped all together as it is somewhat superfluous. Ie. man_made=bridge is the same as bridge=yes Perhaps all of the existing man_made=[value] tags should be changed to [value]=yes Rob On Tue, 20 Oct 2020, 9:46 am Robert Delmenico, wrote: > Please r

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

I like that! On Tue, 20 Oct 2020, 9:59 am Walker Bradley, wrote: > I certainly support Rob’s view on *=yes > > Or if we want something similar to man_made=*, we have natural= we could > also have unnatural= > > On Oct 19, 2020, at 22:55, Robert Delmenico wrote: > >

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

machine-made, >> and constructed" as options instead of man-made. > > > Out of those options, I personally think either "MANufactured" :-), or > "constructed" would be good choices. > > Of course, as mentioned, what do we do with beaver dams & wasp

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

idge is the same as bridge=yes > > Are you aware that we have bridge=yes > and man_made=bridge used with a > different meaning? > > > Perhaps all of the existing man_made=[value] tags should be changed to > [value]=yes > > > Rob > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

he same thing. How they differ has already been > mentioned 2 or 3 times in this thread. > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020, 06:59 Robert Delmenico wrote: > >> Essentially though, they mean the same thing: >> man_made=bridge is for areas >> bridge=yes is for ways >> >>

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

But you could count the bridge=yes (areas) for number of bridges, and bridge=yes (ways) for number of bridges with roads crossing them. Rob On Tue, 20 Oct 2020, 5:52 pm Andrew Harvey, wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020, 5:34 pm Robert Delmenico, wrote: > >> They mean the

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

Nope, not trolling - I have a genuine interest in what the OSM community thinks about the proposal. I for one though do think there is a bias - and I am entitled to hold that view. There are others that support my view so therefore it exists. A proposal will still be put forward as planned. Kin

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Artificial

*Link to proposal page:* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/artificial *Definition*: A tag for identifying human-made (artificial) structures added to the landscape. Please discuss this proposal on the discussion page for the proposal. Kind Regards, Robert Delmenico rtbk

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Artificial

'her generic man' has been fixed - it was a typo. now reads: "confirmed that when people read or hear the generic version of 'man', people form mental pictures of males" ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/l

Re: [Tagging] Parking fee only after some time period

Ballarat in Victoria has kerb side parking where the first hour is free. There is some more information available here: https://www.ballarat.vic.gov.au/city/parking/smarter-parking-ballarat#:~:text=Your%20first%20hour%20of%20parking,the%20Central%20Square%20car%20park%20 . Regards, Rob On We

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Artificial

I'll do some more research before the vote goes ahead. I've read quite a bit of research around gendered language since first mentioning this idea. I'll be sure to list them in the proposal but feel free to send through any sources that are both for and against the arguments I have raised. I'm thi

Re: [Tagging] Tagging from fire_service_areas - landuse:emergency

I'm not sure what you're referring to but I'll put some options here to discuss: Fire districts: used for declaring total for bans in Australia https://www.cfa.vic.gov.au/warnings-restrictions/find-your-fire-district Neighbourhood safer places in Victoria - where you can go as a last resort in a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - electricity=*

I like the new options. In Australia it would be beneficial to note which addresses don't have power, rather than those that do so this would work well. For remote communities in Australia, the off grid option would be good. Many homes also have solar panels connected and this would be great for

Re: [Tagging] religous bias - Feature Proposal - Voting - (Chapel of rest)

All of these would be acceptable to me - Preference from highest to lowest: amenity=deceased_viewing amenity=viewing_arrangements amenity=place_of_mourning amenity=mourning_room amenity=mourning Rob On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 19:45, wrote: > Thanks for all the interventions. > > To avoid that the d

Re: [Tagging] Proposal to change key:man_made to key:human_made

Thank you all for the discussion around changing the tag man_made. After careful consideration I have decided to abandon this proposal - mostly because the fact that the man_made tag is clearly a hodgepodge of tags that probably should be redefined as separate items. Thanks for all your input, fa

[Tagging] Use of crossing:island where crossings and islands are mapped separately

ootway|cycleway=traffic_island on the ways crossing the islands, possibly because JOSM and/or Osmose (incorrectly?) complain. Perhaps I should? -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetm

Re: [Tagging] Use of crossing:island where crossings and islands are mapped separately

imagine. However, it's rather annoying to lose data to what appears to be an undiscussed and potentially misguided personal project. On 27/09/2022 07:42, Robert Skedgell wrote: Where there is a crossing with traffic islands, but the highways forming the crossings and crossing the i

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Street parking revision

Thanks, that should make mapping street parking in my local area much easier and more consistent. Where parking=on_kerb or parking=half_on_kerb are used alongside a separately mapped sidewalk or cycle track, should there be a tag on that way as well? It could be useful to routers concerned wit

Re: [Tagging] ****SPAM:6.1**** Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - Crossing cleanup and deprecation

On 29/11/2022 10:01, Minh Nguyen wrote: Vào lúc 23:01 2022-11-28, Martin Koppenhoefer đã viết: On 29 Nov 2022, at 00:52, Minh Nguyen wrote: Even if it weren't for iD's long-gone preset, I don't think an ostensibly global tag should be defined based on the narrow provisions of a specific cou

[Tagging] map of international institutions, such as EU institutions in Brussels

Cross, etc. buildings yet? Best, Robert ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] map of international institutions, such as EU institutions in Brussels

ind operator does not describe the relation very well. I wonder why there is no tag "organisation:wikidata=*" yet. Also a tag country:wikidata=* could be used, though this would be confusing to link to organisations that have no geographical link whatsovever. Best, Robert O

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - sunbathing

On 17/10/2019 11:03, Paul Allen wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 10:46, Vɑdɪm > wrote: > > > I think it's no more vague than some many other tags in OSM. > > For example have a look at > > leisure=fishing > > > For most rivers in the UK, there are legal

[Tagging] swimming=* access tag

streetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:access#swimming.3D.2A> It would be useful to note areas of open water where swimming is either allowed or prohibited and this can be clearly determined fom signage at the site etc. and recorded using values of yes, no, customers and permissive. -- Robert Ske

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating mini_roundabout

On 23/10/2019 11:14, Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:55:04AM +0200, Colin Smale wrote: >> I would suggest it is not necessary to replace the simple node with a >> circular way. I think it is perfectly acceptable if it is considered >> as a simple turn instead of negotiating a rou

Re: [Tagging] swimming=* access tag

mapped the managed and permitted swimming area in Victoria Dock, London in this way <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698565113>. > ---- > *De :* Robert Skedgell > *Envoyé :* mercredi 23 octobre 2019 12:01 > *À

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating mini_roundabout

Rule 188 of the Highway Code has: "Mini-roundabouts. Approach these in the same way as normal roundabouts. All vehicles MUST pass round the central markings except large vehicles which are physically incapable of doing so. Remember, there is less space to manoeuvre and less time to signal. Avoid m

[Tagging] Vegan "cheese" shops

nly misleading, but could possibly be problematic in France. For the moment, I'm going to use shop=deli + diet:vegan=only as it also sells biscuits, etc. and I think creating shop=vegan_cheese might be excessively specialised. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6776593885

Re: [Tagging] Vegan "cheese" shops

On 18/12/2019 16:24, Philip Barnes wrote: > On Wednesday, 18 December 2019, marc marc wrote: >> Le 18.12.19 à 16:58, Robert Skedgell a écrit : >>> I think creating shop=vegan_cheese might be excessively specialised. >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6776593885

Re: [Tagging] Vegan "cheese" shops

On 18/12/2019 21:55, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 15:58, Robert Skedgell wrote: > >> I've just been to La Fauxmagerie in Shoreditch, London, a vegan "cheese" >> shop. > > shop=hipster > produce=bogus > It's in

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

|backward as a useful combination, as it makes it unambiguous. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Continuous Sidewalk or Cycleway

https://www.enjoywalthamforest.co.uk/blended-cophenhagen-crossings/ -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] [Tagging} no stopping, no parking

I am starting to tag parking:lane:*=* on a cycle route in London for which I have just uploaded Mapillary images. The potential risk of "dooring" and the hope that routing engines may in future be able to make use of this information. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) On 10/02/2020 20:

[Tagging] Points vs Polygons

Hi Everyone, I'm new to OSM and have been I've been making some edits on Main Street of my hometown. All the buildings seem to have been mapped, but many of the businesses are not mapped or have incomplete information, so I've been adding in the business names that aren't there and editing the one

Re: [Tagging] Doorzone bicycle lanes

restriction, where there is a usable lane at the times when parking is prohibited, but effectively no cycle lane when parking is permitted (sometimes with a doorzone risk on the carriageway). -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

=highwater_mark Not every flood mark is a memorial, so probably 2.a/ is not the optimal option. Short discussion about this can be found here [17]. Thank you for help, Robert References [1] http://floodlist.com/dealing-with-floods/flood-high-water-marks [2] https://theconversation.

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

. It can be found in US, GB, AU and probably many other countries [1][2]. Big problem is very wide (misleading) meaning of "high water mark" [3]. regards, Robert [1] http://www.valuergeneral.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

W dniu 26.07.2018 o 12:29, Andrew Davidson pisze: On 25/07/18 22:05, Robert Szczepanek wrote: Question 2: Which tagging convention should we follow: a/ flood_mark=yes + historic=memorial + memorial:type=flood_mark b/ historic=flood_mark + flood_mark:type=(plaque, painted, ...) c/ historic

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

/4381386160 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4381386161 regards, Robert ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

=highwater_mark What would be the optimal tagging solution from OSM point of view? regards Robert ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Flood mark or high water mark

te provided), * historic=flood_mark - with information about flood event (with date) So existence of date on such mark could be a good information for proper tag assignment. I'm not familiar with tides, so please correct me if this is not the case. regards Robert On Sun, Aug 5, 201

Re: [Tagging] Stormwater outlet into stream

re digging (err pun).  In general I go with the > Oxford Dictionary. Just to make things slightly more confusing, there are a fair number of (sometimes quite large) land drainage ditches in the east and south-east of England where "Sewer" is part of the name. They don't fi

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a building constructed for a gastronomic purposes?

r would many > restaurants and pubs. However a modern invention is the "gastro-pub" > where they consider their food to be of a particularly high standard, > not just standard pub food. For a gastro-pub, perhaps amenity=pub + food=yes + cuisine=gastropub (where no more specific

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign direction tagging..

way markings painted on the > road. As far as the law is concerned, that is also a traffic sign, diagram 1003A in TSRGD 2016 (see http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/9/made ). Failure to give way is a criminal offence contrary to s. 36 RTA 1988. > > Phil (trigpoint) &

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign direction tagging..

ve_way is generally indicated by the transverse line marking (= = = =) on the carriageway, traffic_sign=GB:1003A. There is also the upright inverted red triangle traffic_sign=GB:602, which does not need to be present. Failure to comply with either is an offence. -- Robert Skedgell (

Re: [Tagging] 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

On 25/10/18 22:39, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > I have a big issue with crossing=zebra. > it prevent to fill in the other value for crossing like > crossing=traffic_signals crossing=uncontrolled > the wiki [1] said that crossing=zebra is a shortchut for > crossing=uncontrolled + crossing_ref=

Re: [Tagging] 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

On 26/10/18 09:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 10:28 Uhr schrieb Robert Skedgell > mailto:r...@hubris.org.uk>>: > > At a zebra crossing, vehicles must give precedence to pedestrians on the > crossing. No traffic signals are necessary to

Re: [Tagging] 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

On 26/10/18 10:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 11:21 Uhr schrieb Robert Skedgell > mailto:r...@hubris.org.uk>>: > > > I wonder if it's possible differentiate between a normal traffic signal > controlled crossing, an uncontrolled z

Re: [Tagging] 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

would need to set a node every meter on the road, tagging it > "unmarked crossing" because I can cross the road everywhere. > > And I hate it when the satnav announces a warning for the upcoming > crossing, and there comes nothing the requires extra attention. -- Robert Ske

Re: [Tagging] 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

On 26/10/18 14:49, marc marc wrote: > Le 26. 10. 18 à 10:27, Robert Skedgell a écrit : >> Do you have any UK examples of zebra crossings with traffic signals? > > https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/D8E > I dind't have any local knownledge of those but you can see that some &

Re: [Tagging] 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

On 26/10/18 15:39, SelfishSeahorse wrote: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 16:14, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: >> we generally do not map road markings, we don’t map the divider lines between lanes, we don’t map diagonally striped areas where traffic can’t go, we don’t map stop lines, we don’t map any

Re: [Tagging] unmarked crossing, tactile paving, lowered kerbs / was: 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

On 26/10/18 16:00, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > On 26.10.2018 16:41, Robert Skedgell wrote: >> On 26/10/18 11:44, Tom Pfeifer wrote: >>> Tagging "unmarked crossings" does not make sense for me. An unmarked >>> crossing is defined in OSM by a road and a footway shari

Re: [Tagging] 2 meaning for crossing=zebra

On 26/10/18 16:14, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> On 26. Oct 2018, at 16:41, Robert Skedgell wrote: >> >> An unmarked crossing may have no road markings or signs, but if there is >> tactile paving and/or a raised/lowered/flush kerb on the footway >> (sidewa

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

Hi, in OsmHydrant [1] there is already fire_hydrant:coupling_type with various values from Storz to Barcelona (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fire_hydrant:coupling_type). Then there is fire_hydrant:couplings to complement that, describing the actual connectors: https://taginfo.openstree

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

for OsmHydrant, I didn't know about using the semicolon to split values, but I like it more than the forward slash. Coming back to the Austrian "1A/2B" I would additionally allow using these characters instead of diameter values as well resulting in: "A;B;B" If the propos

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

ng that > a fireman cares about. There is not yet a tag for this. In Austria a typical wrench looks like this: http://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/251745653405-0-1/s-l1000.jpg The left side is used to open the bolt at the top, while the right side can be used to open the cap of the hose couplings. Best

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

eople to always use a unit value to avoid mistakes on this tag. On 2017-06-15 15:09, Richard Welty wrote: > On 6/15/17 8:38 AM, Robert Koch wrote: >> Hello Richard, >> >> On 2017-06-15 01:32, Richard Welty wrote: >>> an american usage note: >>> >>>

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

I changed the proposal at [1] to have "l/min" instead of "lpm". While "gpm" is often used, "lpm" isn't. Rationale: According to [2] "km/h" should be preferred over "kmph" (which is highly discouraged). Additionally I added "survey:date", which should be included as well. Regarding the count: I'm

Re: [Tagging] fire hydrants

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant#Types On 2017-06-17 21:51, Kevin Kenny wrote: > On Jun 17, 2017 2:30 PM, "Robert Koch" <mailto:robert.k...@loggia.at>> wrote: > > Moreover how useful is "pillar" if there is "dry_barrel" and &

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:22:55 +0100, Josh Doe wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Steve Bennett wrote: One problem I see with these kinds of proposals is that they map very well to a particular jurisdiction or standard, but will be very hard to apply elsewhere. Perhaps the distinction

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:32:54 +0100, Josh Doe wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Seth Golub wrote: Lowered was used in the original proposal, I'd actually prefer the term sloped. I think that makes quite a bit more sense than lowered. Opinions? I preferred lowered as slopped doesn't de

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:46:45 +0100, Josh Doe wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:14 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: So: kerb=flush kerb=lowered kerb=rolled kerb=yes kerb=raised (ie, higher than normal, for a bus/tram stop...) Now, since

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - TMC - New tagging scheme for TMC

f the proposed tagging scheme. thanks, ..robert Robert Stack trafficto...@gmail.com -- Hi, Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 15:42:29 schrieb fly: >* I still do not get one major point which was totally left out on the >first*>* scheme. What actually belongs to a "point"

Re: [Tagging] Footway as painted lane in highway

I would do the same.  Met vriendelijke groeten Robert Elsenaar "Dave F." schreef: Hi I have a country lane where on one side has a dashed white line about 1.5m from the road edge & a walking person symbol painted on the surface. It has no adjacent raised kerb footpath. Wha

[Tagging] Tags versus Maps

Hi, My name is ZMWandelaar (GB: SundayAfternoonHiker) and living in the Netherlands. I’m starting May of this year. Quit active and wondering if there is some documentation about tags rendered on particular maps? Starting on the OSM Base Map what tags are displayed? Thanks ZMWandelaar ___

Re: [Tagging] Tags versus Maps

Thanks guys, Exactly what I needed Till soon Robert -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Willi Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 5:22 AM To: 'Tag discussion, strategy and related tools' Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tags versus Maps For Mapnik have a look at http://wiki.openstreetma

Re: [Tagging] Proposal - Draft: key=osm for aerial imagery and internel objects

On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:08:37 -, Serge Wroclawski wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Werner Hoch wrote: Aerial Imagery: --- With the new Bing images many new relations have been created that contain boundaries of hires images. I think it would be cool to have

[Tagging] Mapnik Software

Hi, We all know there lot of our maps are rendered with Mapnik. Does somebody knows if there is development going on on this software. Dows thsi software package evolve in supporting more complex situation in GeoData? Robert___ Tagging mailing list Ta

Re: [Tagging] New tag?

untry. If there's not? There is a nice job for you to do. And I can say that it's THE way to learn most of the tags. ;) Robert Elsenaar -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Diego Woitasen try to Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 3:14 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related to

Re: [Tagging] Operator in leisure=stadium?

Sounds well. No complains from my side. Robert Elsenaar -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Diego Woitasen Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 4:11 PM To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Tagging] Operator in leisure=stadium? Hi, What about using operator in leisure=stadium?. For example

Re: [Tagging] Operator in leisure=stadium?

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/ Robert -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Alan Mintz Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:46 AM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Operator in leisure=stadium? At 2010-12-18 12:47, Diego Woitasen wrote: I haven't fou

Re: [Tagging] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state? (response to 2010-12-26 05:29:46)

or values. Robert -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: dies38...@mypacks.net Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 12:00 AM To: Tagging OSM Subject: Re: [Tagging] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state? (response to 2010-12-26 05:29:46) (from ceyockey) I am of the opinion that "addr:state"

Re: [Tagging] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state? (response to 2010-12-26 05:29:46)

bjects in more detail is not a more common method and only used in some specific keys like 'addr". -robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Serge Wroclawski Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 2:07 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Why addr:s

[Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys

Hi, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features lists a certain portion of approved tags. - Why only a part of all approved tags are mentioned here? - Where should I go to find the ultimate list of approved tags? -Robert- ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] designated bike lane

=0.5 cycleway:hazard=narrow I think this is a beautifull set of tags that describes objectivity the shown situation. -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Nathan Edgars II Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 7:49 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] des

Re: [Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys

This was a expected answer. I frequently try to discover the reason OSM mappers accepting this anarchistic rule of NOT having tagging rules at all. What are the advantages for this? - robert - -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Richard Weait Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 10:08 PM To

Re: [Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys

used in the given cercomstances." -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Colin Smale Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 7:52 PM To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys On 02/01/2011 19:24, Ralf Kleineisel wrote: On 01/02/2011 05:42

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Plant Nursery

After how many votes your proposal is approved? -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Kenny Moens Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 5:13 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Plant Nursery Hello, Hereby I want to invite

[Tagging] Differences in cycleways

JdRuC6vD3hZuA&cbp=12,31.36,,0,1.63) But .. now there is a problem. cycleway=track = Who can give me examples on Google street view of what we have to concider to be cycleway-tracks? -Robert-___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

missing intersections - Routing keeps possible - cyclewaytrack got at last a proper name - Streetrelations becomes easier. Wil it make a change in a approval process to develop a proposal on e.g. ..:surface=* ..:maxspeed=* etc,etc ? -Robert- ---Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: M∡rtin

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

s?hl=nl&ie=UTF8&ll=52.235698,5.701776&spn=0.006163,0.021136&z=16&layer=c&cbll=52.235696,5.701937&panoid=amiIS_Sdj-ssgyQipVgJ3Q&cbp=12,274.9,,1,4.23 This is a real cycleway track. -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Peter Wendorff Sent: Thurs

  1   2   >