On 03/05/2020 07:37, Andrew Harvey wrote: > For a while myself and others have been using cycleway:lane=doorzone to > say the bicycle lane is in a doorzone, I've now added documentation of > this as "in use" > at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane. However this > conflicts with the other "in use" cycleway:lane=exclusive/advisory, > since you can have exclusive/advisory lanes which are doorzone or not. > > None of these have gone through a proposal process and both are > independently in use. > > Given cycleway:lane=exclusive/advisory have more use than doorzone, I > think we should put cycleway:lane=exclusive/advisory through the formal > proposal process and then change how we map doorzones as > cycleway:lane:doorzone=yes so it can work together with exclusive/advisory. > > Any other opinions? > > Also on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane there is > cycleway=shared_lane + cycleway:lane=pictogram, should this not be > cycleway:shared_lane=pictogram? > > Given https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane is > already defined as "Used to identify roads which contain a shared lane > marking, or sharrow, to indicate that the travel lane is shared by > bicycles and other vehicles." what does the =pictogram tag mean and how > is it different to cycleway=shared_lane?
Once a consensus has been arrived at for tagging the cycle lane itself, would it also be worth suggesting in the wiki that the tag(s) be used in conjunction with parking:lane:*=parallel ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane )? As a separate issue, there are advisory cycle lanes combined with a single yellow line parking restriction, where there is a usable lane at the times when parking is prohibited, but effectively no cycle lane when parking is permitted (sometimes with a doorzone risk on the carriageway). -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
