On 26/10/18 09:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Fr., 26. Okt. 2018 um 10:28 Uhr schrieb Robert Skedgell > <r...@hubris.org.uk <mailto:r...@hubris.org.uk>>: > > At a zebra crossing, vehicles must give precedence to pedestrians on the > crossing. No traffic signals are necessary to stop traffic in order for > pedestrians to cross. > > It may be the case that there are zebra crossings very close to a > junction with traffic lights, but these are really separate entities and > should be mapped as such. > > I believe the main reason for using zebra markings at traffic signal > controlled crossings in some places is that they will give precedence to > pedestrians even when the lights are turned off. >
Thanks, Martin, that's a case which I wasn't aware of. Luckily for me, it isn't one which can occur here in the UK. (See http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/14/made ) I wonder if it's possible differentiate between a normal traffic signal controlled crossing, an uncontrolled zebra crossing and the type of crossing you describe using appropriate values of traffic_sign=* ? I'm making the possibly parochial assumption that traffic signals and road markings are considered to be traffic signs in the jurisdictions concerned. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
