On 17/10/2019 11:03, Paul Allen wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 10:46, Vɑdɪm <vadp.d...@gmail.com > <mailto:vadp.d...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > I think it's no more vague than some many other tags in OSM. > > For example have a look at > > leisure=fishing > > > For most rivers in the UK, there are legalities around fishing rights. > There is often signage. > There may be maps by angling associations (permission to make use of > those maps must > be gained before adding those details to OSM). > > leisure=swimming_area > > > Signed. Otherwise it's guessing.
Usually also marked by buoys, verifiable by GPS traces and sometimes aerial imagery. Useful to map if you do open water swimming as there are are a lot of sites in the UK where fee=* and opening_hours=* are quite useful, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728007763 > > amenity=lounger > > > Physical object. > > leisure=outdoor_seating > > > Physical object. > > leisure=dance > > > Signed. As in "Disco" or "Dance club." > > > If you don't like it then no problem. Sometimes it's not possible to > satisfy > everyone's taste. > > > Yes, but it's possible to write a proposal that is consistent with OSM's > principles. All > that would involve is stating that it be used for areas with explicit > signage or published > regulations and remove any examples implying that guesswork is > encouraged. That > way the proposal is more likely to be approved. Of course, if you don't > care whether or not > the proposal is approved, then carry on as you are. > > -- > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
