On 26/10/18 11:44, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > On 26.10.2018 09:28, SelfishSeahorse wrote: >> What about tagging the presence or absence of traffic signals with a >> subkey, e.g. crossing:traffic_signals=yes/no? > > Why should we invent a new subtagging scheme when we already have one > with crossing=* + crossing_ref=* ? > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 01:19, Bryan Housel <bhou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> - `crossing=unmarked` which is labeled “Unmarked Crossing” > > Tagging "unmarked crossings" does not make sense for me. An unmarked > crossing is defined in OSM by a road and a footway sharing a node, there > is no need for a tag here, as there is nothing special.
An unmarked crossing may have no road markings or signs, but if there is tactile paving and/or a raised/lowered/flush kerb on the footway (sidewalk), how else would one tag it? > Otherwise I would need to set a node every meter on the road, tagging it > "unmarked crossing" because I can cross the road everywhere. > > And I hate it when the satnav announces a warning for the upcoming > crossing, and there comes nothing the requires extra attention. -- Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
