This also occurs here in Spain with some forest fire services finding more
valuable and precise data about forest tracks and it current state in OSM
than in any other place. I personally know of some people working in
emergency related services that are interested in using OSM and became
mappers fo
I answer inline to Paul and Markus
El dom., 9 dic. 2018 a las 15:12, Paul Allen ()
escribió:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:06 PM dktue wrote:
>
>>
>> I would like to propose a tag for emergency control centers (the place
>> you reach when you call 112 in Europe).
>>
>
> Why?
>
> As far as I know, t
I'm not arguing about any particular tagging, but I would like to point the
fact that the map you send uses different colours for Three Lakes and for
the named lakes (Chloya and Twin Islands lakes). The lakes have blue labels
denoting that the name is for a water body while the group of lakes is in
That was in the past, but now there is a visual editor very easy to use.
El lun., 3 sept. 2018 a las 1:52, Dave Swarthout ()
escribió:
> One of the biggest problems with "creating a proposal" is that the Wiki
> markup language is so painfully tedious I've taken pains to avoid it.
> People always
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
This kind of man-made structure for water transportation is very frequent
in Azores, Madeira, Canary Islands and Mediterranean countries. Please see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levada
Now most of them are tagged with waterway=ditch.
As long as I now, they could be used not only for irrigation b
Hello Szem
No. That way is just the opposite of the intended meaning. It says that
every body need a permit (for example cars) and hikers and riders can
access freely. The previous one was ok. Access=no (or private as someones
suggest) + transportmode=permit
El lun., 13 ago. 2018 20:54, Szem esc
I think that location=underwater is more exact that surface=water. With the
second I expect to walk over the water like Jesus.
Javier
El mié., 8 ago. 2018 a las 1:13, Warin (<61sundow...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> On 08/08/18 09:01, marc marc wrote:
> > Le 08. 08. 18 à 00:26, Warin a écrit :
> >> A
+1 for access=permit
I support it
Regards, Javier
El mar., 7 ago. 2018 20:38, Paul Allen escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:26 PM, Szem wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I have three problems: it's a huge amount of texts :( and I do
>> not speak english so good :(( and I do not understand truly the correl
El mar., 7 ago. 2018 a las 10:33, Warin (<61sundow...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> But "Officially, there is no centre of Australia." So say the experts.
> Probably because they cannot reach consensus, sounds familiar :)
>
We are extending on the "centre" problem, but there aren't even a consensus
in
ugene Alvin Villar ()
escribió:
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 7, 2018, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
> > The same applies to other place nodes like oceans, seas, natural bays,
> straits, etc.
>
> At the risk of forking this discussion to another topic, I'd like to poi
El mar., 7 ago. 2018 a las 9:33, althio () escribió:
> I agree this position is debatable and finally arbitrary.
>
Hi Althio
Then should we delete this node or abstain to create place nodes for
continents? Or should we give a try to the debate and move to a better
position? The same applies to o
Hi Frederik
You can find many examples of places that are verifiable by its boundary,
some countries, provinces, municipalities, but most of the names in
geography refers to diffuse places, from towns to the Amazon Forest (cross
link to Wikidata tag thread). Can't we map them in OSM? For such plac
El sáb., 4 ago. 2018 a las 7:29, Martin Koppenhoefer (<
dieterdre...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 4. Aug 2018, at 01:43, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As this is not a 'landuse' but a landcover I think moving it to
> landcover=clearing would be a good first
t; On 29. Jul 2018, at 09:57, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
> >
> > To avoid problems when querying, in case of explicitly add units, I
> would prefer to use a separate tag like maxspeed:units=mph, for example.
>
>
> spreading the information over 2 tags creates anoth
To avoid problems when querying, in case of explicitly add units, I would
prefer to use a separate tag like maxspeed:units=mph, for example.
Javier
El sáb., 28 jul. 2018 10:30, Mark Wagner escribió:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 22:33:10 +0200
> François Lacombe wrote:
>
> > Well okay
> > Given proble
What's about access=license? For me it has the same meaning. It has 245
uses and is documented
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dlicense.
Javier
2018-07-27 6:22 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny :
> 27. Lipiec 2018 03:38 od t...@fitchdesign.com:
>
>
> My take is to toss an idea/problem
different from spillways, canals and other man made waterways,
> they are not a sub class to them.
> If they are not to be considered part of the waterway key then possibly
> they can be added to the key man_made.
>
>
> On 19/07/18 17:57, Javier Sánchez Portero wrote:
>
> Hello
Hello
I personally prefer a few main values in the waterway to define the general
cases and subtags for specific cases like this, of the type of usage =
fiss_pass. If I am in front of an infrastructure of this type, its physical
characteristics will allow me to distinguish if it is a channel, ditc
Hi Jose
The facts of be able (or not) to overtake and drive in the middle (as Paul
says) are interesting but not necessary relevant for the discussion (IMO).
Anyway, for your example of the LR-333 road, most of the time it isn't
enough wide for two cars to pass comfortably (see here
https://goo.g
I'm not completely sure of what you want tou express. When you say "a
oneway one-wide-lane", I think you refers to a oneway=yes, lanes=1 (correct
me if not). I'm referring to a two way road (oneway=no) with enough width
for two approaching cars to pass each other without having to slow down or
use
I agree with the solution mentioned by Thorsten. The keys oneway=no +
[lanes=2] + division=no have much more sense to me than tagging lanes=1 +
oneway=no for this kind of highway (just the same width that a two lanes
way but without division).
A proper value could serve to indicate also that the d
2018-05-11 14:04 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 11. May 2018, at 14:35, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
> >
> > similar for the other two streets. With the proposed relation, I would
> create a relation with this tags
> >
> &
2018-05-11 10:53 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> May be it would be good to have a relation to keep in only one place an
>> address and link there the affected elements: entrances, buildings, POI's
>> and area for this address. This would be necessary only for some cases like
>> a building with
2018-05-09 22:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> Is there a way to indicate a housenumber is a feature, vs. a property?
>
> In many places, housenumbers refer to buildings or sites, and you might
> omit addresses on contained features (because you can hope for inheritance
> from the containing a
2018-04-04 9:30 GMT+01:00 Philip Barnes :
>
>
> On 4 April 2018 08:44:08 BST, "Javier Sánchez Portero" <
> javiers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bleachers are open structures, usually associated with American High
> School and University sports.
>
> I understand
The definition of the tag building=grandstand says that they are "usually"
roofed, this implies that not always are roofed. I understand that the tag
leisure=bleachers is discouraged for not being British English.
Javier
2018-04-04 8:27 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Wójcik :
> Reading descriptions of these t
2018-03-30 11:37 GMT+01:00 :
> Based on the information provided here:
>
>
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#Service
>
>
>
> and what was stated in previous posts on the mailing list, I would guess
> that the correct tags would be:
>
>
>
> Only serviced by attendant:
>
>
>
El vie., 30 mar. 2018 8:54, escribió:
> While it has never been used before, the logical key to me would be
> self_service:conditional following the usual rules for conditional keys.
>
I agree. It will require only a minor change in the conditional
restrictions wiki.
Javier
>
__
creen while waiting for the
>>> refill, but don't this is something to tag special as you can always ask
>>> the attendant to clean them.
>>>
>>> In some countries it differs, so I suggest to tag things not following
>>> the norm of the country.
>&g
El jue., 29 mar. 2018 23:55, Graeme Fitzpatrick
escribió:
>
>
>
> On 30 March 2018 at 05:34, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
>
>> In my area there are still some serviced stations and I consider this an
>> added value.
>>
>
> Definitely!
>
> Que
;Javier Sánchez Portero" <
javiers...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Opsss! There was a mention to it in the Tag:amenity=fuel wiki. I didn't
> see it. Thank you.
>
> 2018-03-29 13:14 GMT+01:00 Michal Fabík :
>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Javier Sánchez Portero
&
2018-03-29 15:22 GMT+01:00 Javier Sánchez Portero :
> 2018-03-29 13:14 GMT+01:00 Michal Fabík :
>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Javier Sánchez Portero
>> wrote:
>> > Sorry, english is not my first languange and I'm not sure of have been
>> used
>
Opsss! There was a mention to it in the Tag:amenity=fuel wiki. I didn't see
it. Thank you.
2018-03-29 13:14 GMT+01:00 Michal Fabík :
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
> > Sorry, english is not my first languange and I'm not sure of ha
Sorry, english is not my first languange and I'm not sure of have been used
the correct word in the subject. I'm looking for a key to denote if you
have to refuel by your self or not. I meant if the station operates on self
service mode.
Didn't found nothing in the wiki or taginfo.
I'm confused a
I would tag the entire place between buildings as place=square, the flat
surfaces as highway=pedestrian+area=yes, the steps as area steps [1] and
the bleachers as leisure=bleachers.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Area-steps
Javier
El 26 ene. 2018 22:36, "OSMDoudou" <
1
El 15 ene. 2018 8:51, "Martin Koppenhoefer"
escribió:
2018-01-15 8:54 GMT+01:00 OSMDoudou <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-
288ea1238...@gmx.com>:
> generally a "painting". I'd rather subtype the surface value to something
> specific like paving_stones=portugese_pavement
>
+1
Javier
2018-01-04 3:05 GMT+00:00 Kevin Kenny :
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Kevin Kenny
> wrote:
>
>> By contrast, adding 'historic' and adjusting tagging to current use
>> is already a common practice among those who fix repurposed
>> features from the GNIS import. I didn't invent it.
>>
>>
> Oh,
Would any one support a proposal for a new tag building:part:levels=* to
separate the levels of the building from the part as in this case:
way1 {building=residential, building:part=yes, building:levels=4,
building:part:levels=3}
way2 {building:part=yes, building:levels=4}
way2 is inside way1
Thi
Hello Tobias and Cristian
2017-08-18 17:41 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr :
> On 18.08.2017 10:01, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> > If e.g. the lower floors of the apartment building is wider than the
> > upper floors, you can tag the outline with both, building=apartments and
> > building:part=yes and the appropr
2017-08-18 9:01 GMT+01:00 Tom Pfeifer :
> On 18.08.2017 02:30, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Javier Sánchez Portero <
>> javiers...@gmail.com <mailto:javiers...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> * In the wiki [1] says that the outline shou
Sorry, I should have taken time to give some examples. Please read below (I
rev.
2017-08-18 1:30 GMT+01:00 Clifford Snow :
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Javier Sánchez Portero <
> javiers...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am thinking in ways to reduce t
Hello.
I am thinking in ways to reduce the complexity that introduces the mapping
of parts of buildings. For example:
* If one part is inscribed within a larger one, can I use simple ways
overlapped and leave to the render decide how to draw them or should I
create a multipolygon for the larger p
I'm also using landuse=industrial for towers, substations and all the
related gear despite being in a rural area.
2017-06-30 4:37 GMT+01:00 John Willis :
> Which landuse is appropriate for power towers?
>
> http://www.tepco.co.jp/pg/electricity-supply/operation/
> images/img_substation_04.jpg
>
>
The services offered are very similar to a travel agency, but for local
services instead of remote ones. Maybe shop=tourism_agency?
2017-06-29 23:13 GMT+01:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick :
> I won't disagree with you about shop=tourism as no, I've never heard of a
> tourism shop either (& we live in a tou
I edited the wiki and tried to improve the text a bit. As English is not my
native langauge any additional correction will be appreciated.
Best regards.
2017-06-23 10:18 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> 2017-06-23 10:01 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero :
>
>> Regardin
Hello
Regarding to the use of addr:place together with addr:street, I see a
discrepancy between [1] which says: "Should not be used together with
addr:street=*"
And [2], which says: "Use addr:place additional to addr:street=* for such
building, whose numbers belong not to street, but to some othe
2017-06-19 14:15 GMT+01:00 Frederik Ramm :
> If you can't point to a sign on the ground, don't map topoynms.
>
-1. May be in some urban areas it's usual to find signs for toponyms, but
more frequently -mainly in rural and wild areas- the toponyms are in the
knowledge of the local people, not in s
2017-06-16 19:52 GMT+01:00 Dudley Ibbett :
> I’m slightly confused by this discussion. I live in a “hamlet” which is
> within a “dispersed settlement”. “Dispersed settlement” describes the
> pattern of isolated dwellings, farmyards, hamlets, villages etc. on a
> much larger scale.
>
>
>
> We don
Also note that, at least here in Spain, in a dispersed settlement the
'streets' usually have no name and the postal address of the building is
given by the name of the settlement and a housenumber. So this is a valid
postal address "Lugar Anocheza, 10" where "Lugar" means place.
___
Hello
I would like to say that here, in Spain, we are in the same case. The
goverment office for population census give in [1] for each unit
(settlement) two values refering to the nucleus population and to the
dispersed population. Very frequently, there are units with only dispersed
population a
51 matches
Mail list logo
