2018-01-04 3:05 GMT+00:00 Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> By contrast, adding 'historic' and adjusting tagging to current use >> is already a common practice among those who fix repurposed >> features from the GNIS import. I didn't invent it. >> >> > Oh, and I oughtn't have needed to, but I just checked, and at least > one of the buildings in question is on the National Register of Historic > Places. I'm guessing that in itself will not satisfy Warin as to its > 'historic' nature, but I'm not sure what authority or combination of > authorities would. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > Hello
As it is included in a register for historic place, I suggest to use the Key:heritage [1]. Where I live, the heritage is defined by law as any thing with *historical*, architectural, artistic, archaeological, ethnographic, palaeontological, scientific or technical interest. building=detached heritage:building=school [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage Regards, Javier
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
