I agree with the solution mentioned by Thorsten. The keys oneway=no + [lanes=2] + division=no have much more sense to me than tagging lanes=1 + oneway=no for this kind of highway (just the same width that a two lanes way but without division).
A proper value could serve to indicate also that the division was present once ago but actually are blured, as Martin suggested. I would like a proposal for the division key and a clarification in they key lanes wiki. Cheers, Javier El mar., 22 may. 2018 18:46, <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> escribió: > Personally, I tend to tag roads that are wide enough for 2 lanes (two cars > can pass each other without noticeably slowing down) and which are clearly > meant to be two lane (one lane each direction) roads with: > > lanes=2 > divider=no > > Yes, I know that is in violation of the strict reading of the wiki, but I > feel it makes sense, and as far as I can determine, tagging roads that are > meant to have two lanes with lanes=2 even in the absence of such road > markings seems to be pretty widespread practice. (The use of the divider > tag isn't very widespread, but again, I feel it makes sense in this > context.) > > Cheers, > Thorsten > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, 23 May 2018 01:18 > > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > > Subject: [Tagging] Sample tagging for highways with no lane > > markings > > > > In reviewing the wiki in preparation to fixing some of my older > > mapping, it seems there is an inconsistency in how to tag a road > > that is wide enough to two lanes of traffic but is lacking lane > > striping. > > > > In the lanes description [1] it says "the lanes=* key should be > > used to specify the total number of marked lanes of a road." But in > > the out of town highway tagging sample page [2] with a photo > > described as "smaller road, maybe tertiary with appropriate > > administrative status" it shows a lane count on a road with no > > markings. > > > > Am I correct in believing that the example photo should have its > > tagging changed, dropping the lanes=2 and adding a width tag (if > > the width is known or can be reasonably estimated)? > > > > My current interest is in fixing the tagging for residential roads > > that are wide enough for bi-directional traffic with legal parallel > > parking but have no markings on the pavement. I don't see a exact > > match to that in either the urban [3] or rural highway [2] tagging > > example pages. > > > > To use the street I live on as an example, am I correct that a > > residential road with bidirectional traffic and parallel parking > > with no markings should be tagged as: > > > > highway=residential > > surface=asphalt > > parking:lane:both=parallel > > width=40’0" > > maxspeed=25 mph > > > > If, and only if, a center strip is added then lanes=2 should be > > added. (I actually measured the width in this case but for hope to > > be able to use the measurement tool on aerial imagery in JOSM for > > most cases). > > > > Is my current understanding correct? If so, I will update the wiki > > pages for both the urban and rural highway tagging examples to > > reflect that and will take some photos of the roads in my area to > > make additional examples. > > > > > > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Description > > [2] > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_tagging_samples/out_of_ > > town > > [3] > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_tagging_samples/urban > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
