I edited the wiki and tried to improve the text a bit. As English is not my native langauge any additional correction will be appreciated.
Best regards. 2017-06-23 10:18 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > 2017-06-23 10:01 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero <javiers...@gmail.com>: > >> Regarding to the use of addr:place together with addr:street, I see a >> discrepancy between [1] which says: "Should not be used together with >> addr:street=*" >> >> And [2], which says: "Use addr:place additional to addr:street=* for such >> building, whose numbers belong not to street, but to some other object. It >> is proposed to delete addr:street=* from such houses in the future" >> >> I will like to correct this with a unified criterion in both places. >> Which one is the prefered criterion for you? I think that the addr:place >> tag should be used when there isn't a street with name to assign to the >> address so I don't see corret to use addr:street together with addr:place. >> What is your opinion? >> > > > I agree with you, either use > addr:place > > or use > addr:street > > As the reason for using addr:place is that there isn't a street to which > the address refers, I also don't see which street should go into > addr:street, it makes no sense. > > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging