Hello Szem No. That way is just the opposite of the intended meaning. It says that every body need a permit (for example cars) and hikers and riders can access freely. The previous one was ok. Access=no (or private as someones suggest) + transportmode=permit
El lun., 13 ago. 2018 20:54, Szem <szembiket...@gmail.com> escribió: > access=permit, foot=yes, horse=yes, bicycle=yes > ? > > > - Roads in wildlife conservation areas: > access= private, motor_vehicle=permit, bicycle=permit, foot=yes > > access=permit, foot=yes > ? > > > > OK? > > Counter: > In the page of > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access%3Dpermit > the small counter counts only "access=permit" tag, but these roads > doesn't have this tag. > Can be converted it to "*=permit" or sg like this? If I change all the > roads, it will not look. > > Wiki: > When I mentioned the wiki, I meant this page below it: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access - Access tag values > Can not you put this access value there? > > Thanks, > > Szem > > 2018.08.12. 23:30 keltezéssel, Graeme Fitzpatrick írta: > > On 13 August 2018 at 06:50, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:48 AM Szem <szembiket...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I begun to use the "permit" tag, what is the correct tagging for these >> categories? >> > >> > - Roads found in Waterworks area (You could get permit only for biking >> and walking, no cars except for their own ones) >> > access=private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = private ? bicycle=permit, >> foot=permit, horse=no >> >> Sounds right; no need to tag motor_vehicle separately, since 'access' >> covers all transportation modes that aren't called out separately. >> >> > - Roads on the embankments (By any motor vehicle without permission is >> forbidden, except for their own ones, other access is free) >> > access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle =permit ? foot=yes, horse=yes, >> bicycle=yes, >> >> If permission is readily obtainable, then 'permit'. If permission >> happens on a case-by-case basis, 'private' is probably closer. >> > > In cases when only official vehicles (National Parks, Water supply etc) > are allowed, I've always called that vehicles=no, working on " *no* – No > access for the general public."? > > > - Roads managed by Hunting Association, wildlife conservation areas >> (Crossing by any vehicle without permission is forbidden, except for their >> own ones): >> > access= private, motor_vehicle / vehicle = permit, foot=yes, >> horse=permit, bicycle= permit >> >> Once again, if it's "access granted if you comply with the >> formalities", then 'permit', otherwise 'private'. The Hunting >> Association one sounds as if it restricts access to its own members? >> In that case, it's definitely "private." > > > & yes, I'd agree that Members only is "private" > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
