Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Le 02/05/2024 à 21:50, Frantisek Borsik a écrit : Thanks, Colin. This was just another great read on video (and audio - in the past emails from you) bullet-proofing for the near future. To be honest, the consensus on the bandwidth overall in the bufferbloat related circles was in the 25/3 - 1

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Le 03/05/2024 à 03:48, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : There's also the not-so-minor issue of video compression, which generally has the effect of removing largely imperceptible detail from your video frames so your high-res video will fit through the pipeline you've got to squeeze it

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Le 02/05/2024 à 16:47, Colin_Higbie a écrit : Alex, fortunately, we are not bound to use personal experiences and observations on this. We have real market data that can provide an objective, data-supported conclusion. No need for a chocolate-or-vanilla-ice-cream-tastes-better discussion on t

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Le 02/05/2024 à 16:47, Colin_Higbie a écrit : Alex, fortunately, we are not bound to use personal experiences and observations on this. We have real market data that can provide an objective, data-supported conclusion. No need for a chocolate-or-vanilla-ice-cream-tastes-better discussion on t

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

stian Moeller To: Alexandre Petrescu Cc: Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink Subject: Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi Alexandre, On 30. Apr 2024, at 16:25, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Colin, 8K usefulness over 4K: the h

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Message: 1 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:32:51 +0200 From: Sebastian Moeller To: Alexandre Petrescu Cc: Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink Subject: Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Hi Alexandre, On 30. Apr 2024, at 16:25, Alexa

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Le 30/04/2024 à 16:45, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : Hi Alexandre, On 30. Apr 2024, at 16:40, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: Le 30/04/2024 à 16:32, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : Hi Alexandre, On 30. Apr 2024, at 16:25, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Colin, 8K usefulness over 4K

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Le 30/04/2024 à 16:32, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : Hi Alexandre, On 30. Apr 2024, at 16:25, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Colin, 8K usefulness over 4K: the higher the resolution the more it will be possible to zoom in into paused images. It is one of the advantages. People

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Colin, 8K usefulness over 4K: the higher the resolution the more it will be possible to zoom in into paused images.  It is one of the advantages.  People dont do that a lot these days but why not in the future. Spotify lower quality than CD and still usable: one would check not Spotify, but

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Le 16/03/2024 à 20:10, Colin_Higbie via Starlink a écrit : Just to be clear: 4K is absolutely a standard in streaming, with that being the most popular TV being sold today. 8K is not and likely won't be until 80+" TVs become the norm. I can agree screen size is one aspect pushing the higher

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

I retract the message, sorry, it is true that some teleoperation and visioconf also use 4K. So the latency is important there too. A visioconf with 8K and 3D 16K might need latency reqs too. Le 16/03/2024 à 18:18, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 15/03/2024 à 21:31, Colin_Higbie

Re: [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Le 15/03/2024 à 21:31, Colin_Higbie via Starlink a écrit : Spencer, great point. We certainly see that with RAM, CPU, and graphics power that the software just grows to fill up the space. I do think that there are still enough users with bandwidth constraints (millions of users limited to DSL

Re: [Starlink] Measuring the Satellite Links of a LEO Network

Le 03/03/2024 à 11:23, Gert Doering via Starlink a écrit : Hi, On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 07:11:16PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: sorry, it could be that I have it on the wrong side. If VRRP and starlink like to have that IPv6 LL address with ff:fe inside, and always constant

Re: [Starlink] Time Synchronization in Satellite Networks

eethoven met Liszt and one got contradictory answers). Alex Hesham On Sat, Mar 2, 2024, 9:18 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: some of the question is to what level of precision one wants the time to be maintained synchronized between entities, and for what applicat

Re: [Starlink] Time Synchronization in Satellite Networks

range and NTP can easily maintain nano-second synch'ed precision, from experience with ground links. Le 02/03/2024 à 18:01, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 02/03/2024 à 16:38, Christian von der Ropp via Starlink a écrit : Why not acquire the time directly from by the sate

Re: [Starlink] Time Synchronization in Satellite Networks

Le 02/03/2024 à 16:03, Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink a écrit : Time synchronization, for satellite networks, faces several challenges: 1. Signal Propagation Delays: Unlike terrestrial networks where signals travel through cables at the speed of light, satellite communication involves signals

Re: [Starlink] Time Synchronization in Satellite Networks

This is a 2nd time I do this here, but let me this time put it bluntly, and please excuse me if I am too direct.  This is not a reproach to anybody or anything, and I know this is current practice.  It is just that for me the practice is destabilizing.  Probably I am myself a little bit na3ive

Re: [Starlink] Time Synchronization in Satellite Networks

Le 02/03/2024 à 16:38, Christian von der Ropp via Starlink a écrit : Why not acquire the time directly from by the satellite terminal and run local NTP servers instead of syncing via the Internet? Certainly it is possible to run ntpd servers and clients on satellites and maintain synchronized

Re: [Starlink] space packet protocol document

, I doubt that two implementations (if any of IPv6 over CCSDS links exists) would interoperate with this under spec. Marc. Moreover the snapshot you attached is about TC frames, I.e. for telecommand services… Tomaso Sent from my iPhone On 28. Feb 2024, at 18:47, Alexandre Petrescu via

Re: [Starlink] space packet protocol document

attached is about TC frames, I.e. for telecommand services… Tomaso Sent from my iPhone On 28. Feb 2024, at 18:47, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: The CCSDS spec is an interesting document. I am trying to find a packet dump of a CCSDS packet that travelled in space according to this

Re: [Starlink] space packet protocol document

be carried in telecommand services... But I will wait and see for some time. Alex Tomaso Sent from my iPhone On 28. Feb 2024, at 18:47, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: The CCSDS spec is an interesting document. I am trying to find a packet dump of a CCSDS packet that travelled in

Re: [Starlink] space packet protocol document

The CCSDS spec is an interesting document. I am trying to find a packet dump of a CCSDS packet that travelled in space according to this CCSDS spec.  If there is a place with CCSDS packet dumps I am interested to see them. Given that, I could think about writing an IPv6-over-CCSDS preliminary

Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal

Le 23/02/2024 à 14:23, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734 In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and good range, and relative ease of

Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal

Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734 In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and good range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the starlink frequencies, I see starlinks fading from

Re: [Starlink] First tests of the Starlink REV4 (aka gen3)

Le 25/01/2024 à 02:54, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : On 25/01/2024 1:37 am, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Thanks for the tests! The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive. "Speeds" (observed data rates) in terms of Starlink hardware are actually fairly mean

Re: [Starlink] Measuring the Satellite Links of a LEO Network

sorry, it could be that I have it on the wrong side. If VRRP and starlink like to have that IPv6 LL address with ff:fe inside, and always constant, so be it.  There might be some reasons for it to be that way. Alex Le 13/02/2024 à 18:44, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 13/02

Re: [Starlink] Measuring the Satellite Links of a LEO Network

, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), p...@uvic.ca, Web.UVic.CA/~pan On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:14 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: this is an issue for 6MAN WG at IETF, but this is the text with the issue in the paper: From the user device or customer router at 192.168.1.1, we can

Re: [Starlink] Measuring the Satellite Links of a LEO Network

or maybe the VRRP people dont want that address to be opaque at all, I dont know. Le 13/02/2024 à 18:39, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 13/02/2024 à 18:12, J Pan a écrit : yes, the mac for fe80::200:5eff:fe00:101 is 00:00:5e:00:01:01 (a virtual mac used by the virtual router

Re: [Starlink] Measuring the Satellite Links of a LEO Network

.UVic.CA/~pan On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:14 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: this is an issue for 6MAN WG at IETF, but this is the text with the issue in the paper: From the user device or customer router at 192.168.1.1, we can reach its GS gateway at 100.64.0.1 (or equivalently fe80::

Re: [Starlink] Measuring the Satellite Links of a LEO Network

this is an issue for 6MAN WG at IETF, but this is the text with the issue in the paper: From the user device or customer router at 192.168.1.1, we can reach its GS gateway at 100.64.0.1 (or equivalently fe80::200:5eff:fe00:101 for IPv6) That IPv6 link-local address has an 'ff:fe' in it; the p

Re: [Starlink] 42 petabytes/day and ...

Le 02/02/2024 à 04:07, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : from here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39200323 There were two things that fell out of reading that article for me. "each laser is grossly underused on average, at 0.432% of its maximum capacity." + "Brashears also said Starlin

Re: [Starlink] First tests of the Starlink REV4 (aka gen3)

Thanks for the tests! The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive. At video pointer 5:53 the reported Ping ?/dl/ul 88/204/121 ms and Jitter 9.2 ms seem interesting.     ==> I am not sure which of the two (ping or jitter) you name 'latency'?     ==> I am not sure why the dl (download) ping

Re: [Starlink] Nokia is Pushing for the 1st Cellular Network on the Moon

Le 22/01/2024 à 00:12, Michael Richardson via Starlink a écrit : David Lang wrote: > but now that SpaceX has launched their first 6 satellites that talk cellular, > how many of them would be needed to give continuous coverage of the > moon? Would they be in orbit of the moon, o

Re: [Starlink] Nokia is Pushing for the 1st Cellular Network on the Moon

Le 22/01/2024 à 00:12, Michael Richardson via Starlink a écrit : Hesham ElBakoury wrote: > Can a terrestrial terminal connect with a 5G terminal on the moon via GEO? No, very unlikely. Except that Nokia 3310 phones have super-powers. What would be needed for a smartphone is a more powe

Re: [Starlink] Nokia is Pushing for the 1st Cellular Network on the Moon

Le 21/01/2024 à 23:59, Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink a écrit : Can a terrestrial terminal connect with a 5G terminal on the moon via GEO? No, it is too far away and the smartphone does not have enough power for that. A terrestrial terminal would connect to a 5G ground station, or maybe via a

Re: [Starlink] Nokia is Pushing for the 1st Cellular Network on the Moon

hopefully on the Moon the Nokia 3GPP network will use prefix delegation for IPv6 to end user. (as opposed to what 3GPP networks do on Earth, where they dont use DHCPv6-PD to end user). Le 21/01/2024 à 20:32, Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink a écrit : This article is interesting https://www.

Re: [Starlink] community gateways

Le 17/01/2024 à 21:57, Inemesit Affia via Starlink a écrit : I don't think the idea of advertising with the association of fiber is only about latency. Think "symmetrical link" which isn't common even for Enterprise satcom. IT is true.  That symmetrical aspect - upload speed similar to downloa

Re: [Starlink] community gateways

Le 17/01/2024 à 17:53, Marc Blanchet a écrit : Le 17 janv. 2024 à 11:48, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : thanks, I did not know that JIOspace too (or maybe first) aims at that - it's a great initiative. It seems to me this race creates the place for later services to be c

Re: [Starlink] community gateways

ng at below 10km.  It seems to me that lowering the altitudes is the only way towards fiber-like latencies. Le 17/01/2024 à 16:13, Inemesit Affia a écrit : o3b advertises their service like this..see Jiospacefiber as another example. Jan 17, 2024 3:03:11 PM Alexandre Petrescu via Sta

Re: [Starlink] community gateways

“With Community Gateways, Starlink satellites are able to deliver fiber-like speeds with local providers distributing connectivity to homes, businesses, and governments using last-mile fiber, fixed wireless and mobile wireless,” SpaceX said on its website

Re: [Starlink] Starlink’s first direct-to-cell phone text messages, 1/8/2024.

Le 11/01/2024 à 18:37, Frantisek Borsik via Starlink a écrit : https://api.starlink.com/public-files/DIRECT_TO_CELL_FIRST_TEXT_UPDATE.pdf Originally shared by Larry Press on Twitter: https://x.com/larrypress/status/1745484063656563055 Thanks! Related to this, I think there were recurring qu

Re: [Starlink] 10k starlink terminals repaired in ukraine

Le 31/12/2023 à 20:21, Oleg Kutkov via Starlink a écrit : Thank you :) Of course, I’m not the only one who repaired so many terminals. We have now created and are actively developing several volunteer service centers. They do most of the repairs. There is nothing like this anywhere else in t

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

states in bits.  Because ssh implementations do feature 'quantum resistance' and thus they might be preferable from the security standpoint. Alex On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 9:59 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Le 24/12/2023 à 02:29, Lukasz Bromirski via Starlink a écr

Re: [Starlink] starlink topology with tunnels

t;a better illustration about starlink user terminal (ut), community gateway (cg), ground station (gs), gateway (gw), carrier-grade network address translator (cgnat), point-of-presence (pop), etc ". It is a user opinion. Alex Le 06/01/2024 à 16:01, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écri

Re: [Starlink] starlink topology with tunnels (was: Info on IP country ranges)

rlink user terminal (ut), community gateway (cg), ground station (gs), gateway (gw), carrier-grade network address translator (cgnat), point-of-presence (pop), etc ". It is a user oppinion. Alex Le 06/01/2024 à 16:01, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 23/12/2023 à 22:35

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 23/12/2023 à 22:35, J Pan a écrit : starlink uses tunnels a lot https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/17w3sey/a_better_illustration_about_starlink_user/ . starlink assigned ip addresses are pop-specific -- J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), p...@uvic.ca, Web.UVic.

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Subject: Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges Message-ID: <1fe6b070-c2a0-4c35-8876-33feded81...@viagenie.ca> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Le 13 déc. 2023 à 05:33, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 12/12/2023 à 11:50, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : Hi Steven,

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

me in which spectrum would be required. Le 21/12/2023 à 11:25, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : overlap: sorry! it is indeed MHz and not GHz, I overlooked that. But the 117-137 _MHz_ bands are already used from ground to planes; the modernisations I have seen of it relate to au

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

9_12_2023_ITU-NEWSLETTER_INT)&mc_cid=c66517f297&mc_eid=3ca8d7193e Le 06/12/2023 à 13:02, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : In another context someone pointed me to spacex saying 'D-band' in april 2023 in this "NTIA Docket No. 230308-0068 / Docket NTIA-2023-0003"

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application

Sorry, I do not want to add to any vitriol on this topic.  But there is a technical aspect that might help to clarify some aspects. Le 15/12/2023 à 23:13, David Bray, PhD via Starlink a écrit : This GPT(human)bot was responding to the engineered prompt:  >>why do you think telehealth won't work

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

206-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D&ct=t(EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_19_12_2023_ITU-NEWSLETTER_INT)&mc_cid=c66517f297&mc_eid=3ca8d7193e Le 06/12/2023 à 13:02, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : In another context someone pointed me to spacex saying 'D-band' in april 2023 in this "NTIA Docket No.

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application

Le 15/12/2023 à 16:46, Livingood, Jason a écrit : [...] The notion that a home user needs 25G or more these days is ridiculous. ;-) :-) yes and no. If one had a 25 gbit/s line arriving at home one might want to try multiple TV 3D 8K viewers and recordings, while ongoing DSD4096 5.1 audio stre

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application

Le 15/12/2023 à 13:44, Gert Doering a écrit : Hi, On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:43:25PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: So, a requirement to a competitive satcom would be like 25 Gbit/s.  I think it is not impossible to make, if many intermediate layers (HAPS, drones etc) are used, and larger ba

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application

Hi, Sebastien, Le 15/12/2023 à 14:06, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : Hi Alexandre, On Dec 15, 2023, at 13:07, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Le 14/12/2023 à 19:51, Nathan Simington via Starlink a écrit : Hi folks, (Apologies in advance to non-Americans or anyone who doesn't

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application

Le 15/12/2023 à 13:37, Gert Doering a écrit : Hi, On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:07:10PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: subscriber ; they light only one, equalling 1gbit/s.  It means that they could scale it up later to 4 or 5 gbit/s, without additional installation.  At the You

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application

Le 14/12/2023 à 19:51, Nathan Simington via Starlink a écrit : Hi folks, (Apologies in advance to non-Americans or anyone who doesn't care about American home broadband policy! Please feel free to immediately delete!) I don't want to get overly political on this mailing list, but my statem

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 13/12/2023 à 19:27, David Lang a écrit : On Wed, 13 Dec 2023, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: A tunnel within 3GPP network (GTP) is used, among other reasons, to support mobility.  The 'mobility', among some interpretations, is to maintain a constant IP address for a

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 12/12/2023 à 11:50, Sebastian Moeller a écrit : Hi Steven, On Dec 12, 2023, at 11:33, Steven via Starlink wrote: Hi Alex, Thank you for the further detail, my apologies if I misunderstand your line of inquiry. I had interpreted it to mean that you were still not convinced it was nat

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 12/12/2023 à 11:33, Steven a écrit : Hi Alex, Thank you for the further detail, my apologies if I misunderstand your line of inquiry. I had interpreted it to mean that you were still not convinced it was native from the perspective of the end-user visible components. You are right that th

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 12/12/2023 à 03:43, Steven a écrit : Thanks for this reference that explicitly states it is IPv6 native. https://support.starlink.com/?topic=1192f3ef-2a17-31d9-261a-a59d215629f4 is another Starlink resource that confirms that a /56 is provided. This one doesn't explicitly mention native, b

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Steven, Thanks for the clarifications. It is indeed very advantageous to use DHCPv6-PD from a Client in home to starlink Server, and obtain a /56. But to be native IPv6, it would need the IPv6 packets to travel natively (sit directly on the link layer) between home and starlink network.  If

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Typos due to smartphone keyboard. On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, 12:37 a.m. Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Le 08/12/2023 à 09:30, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : > > Le 08/12/2023 à 06:57, Freddie Cash a écrit : >> Dishy gets a /64 > >

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 08/12/2023 à 13:46, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 08/12/2023 à 13:24, Steven a écrit : Alexandre, Are you sure the DHCPv6-PD server is in Starlink network and not on the MikroTik router? That would be quite the unusual setup, and even so would require that I obtain said

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 08/12/2023 à 13:24, Steven a écrit : Alexandre, Are you sure the DHCPv6-PD server is in Starlink network and not on the MikroTik router? That would be quite the unusual setup, and even so would require that I obtain said /56 from elsewhere (such as via a tunnel) to then delegate back to

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

You can then request a /56 using DHCP-PD (separate to the /64 used on the WAN interface). Yes, it might be indeed that the router (provided by starlink router, or not by somebody else) runs a DHCPv6-PD server. Alex Cheers, Steven On Fri, 8 Dec 2023, at 7:30 PM, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

nnections. And there doesn't appear to be any restrictions on IPv6 traffic. This is with the round Dishy. Cheers, Freddie Typos due to smartphone keyboard. On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, 3:54 a.m. Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Le 04/12/2023 à 19:17, J Pan via Starlink a écrit :

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

. Alex You can then request a /56 using DHCP-PD (separate to the /64 used on the WAN interface). Cheers, Steven On Fri, 8 Dec 2023, at 7:30 PM, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Le 08/12/2023 à 06:57, Freddie Cash a écrit : Dishy gets a /64 IF Dishy gets a /64 from the starlink operator

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

, it might be indeed that the router (provided by starlink router, or not by somebody else) runs a DHCPv6-PD server. Alex Cheers, Steven On Fri, 8 Dec 2023, at 7:30 PM, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Le 08/12/2023 à 06:57, Freddie Cash a écrit : Dishy gets a /64 IF Dishy gets a /64

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 08/12/2023 à 09:30, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 08/12/2023 à 06:57, Freddie Cash a écrit : Dishy gets a /64 IF Dishy gets a /64 from the starlink operator then I am afraid one cant make subnets in home, because each other subnet needs a distinct /64. and I've t

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

y. Cheers, Freddie Typos due to smartphone keyboard. On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, 3:54 a.m. Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Le 04/12/2023 à 19:17, J Pan via Starlink a écrit : > yes, starlink does respond to its customers' complaints, although > sometimes slowly. its ipv

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

for power-over-ethernet for gen-2 dishes ;-) -- J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), p...@uvic.ca, Web.UVic.CA/~pan On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 3:55 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: Le 04/12/2023 à 19:17, J Pan via Starlink a écrit : yes, starlink does respond to its customers

Re: [Starlink] Info on IP country ranges

Le 04/12/2023 à 19:17, J Pan via Starlink a écrit : yes, starlink does respond to its customers' complaints, although sometimes slowly. its ipv4 address acquisition is scattered around as a latecomer to the isp world, and as a global local isp, it's more troublesome. ip packets have to be tunnel

Re: [Starlink] fcc NOI response due Dec 1

Thank you for having prepared this response. It is a US-centric context, but it might apply everywhere else where fiber and satcom access are considered in competition.  Besides, the latency reduction priming over bandwidth increase, might be discussed in a 6G context as well, be that with NTN

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

Le 23/11/2023 à 14:40, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 17/11/2023 à 23:56, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : Right. Word from the Tongan government's MEIDECC is that it's D band as per the filing and that the reports on W band are wrong. Can MEIDECC point me t

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

ps://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-22-91A1.pdf (not sure > whether it is the most authoritative, but at least the mathematics > 28*120 at altitude 525 does make sense to be 3360). > >> Altitude (km) Inclination (degrees) Orbital Planes sats/plane Total sats >> >> 340

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

Le 19/11/2023 à 02:18, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : On 19/11/2023 6:43 am, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: For me, the filing has a syntax error in the name (a superfluous preceding quote in "'ESIAFI II").  It is an English error.  It should be corrected.  Se

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

2 12 144 >> 614 115.7 18 18 324 >> > > I found this earlier FCC document has this table at this URL > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-22-91A1.pdf (not sure > whether it is the most authoritative, but at least the mathematics > 28*120 at altitude 525 does m

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

3328 1203360 604 148 12 12 144 614 115.7 18 18 324 Alex Le 16/11/2023 à 10:30, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 15/11/2023 à 16:48, David Fernández via Starlink a écri

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

28 120    3360 535 33    28 120    3360 604 148   12 12 144 614 115.7     18         18 324 Alex Le 16/11/2023 à 10:30, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : Le 15/11/20

Re: [Starlink] Starlink filings for D-Band via Tonga

Le 15/11/2023 à 16:48, David Fernández via Starlink a écrit : I have got news about the recent filing by Starlink for the use of frequencies in D-band: https://www.itu.int/ITU-R/space/asreceived/Publication/DisplayPublication/53068 This has been done via Tonga, not the USA, and is for both, upli

Re: [Starlink] The curious case of the missing Starlink spectrum licences

Le 13/11/2023 à 02:27, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : The other day I had reason to look up the Starlink spectrum licences in NZ. These are issued by Radio Spectrum Management in NZ and used to be in the Register of Radio Frequencies, which is publicly searchable: https://www.rsm.govt.

Re: [Starlink] one dish per household is silly.

Le 14/11/2023 à 06:13, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : So that's just over 6 kW if phase and voltage align, which in an application like this, they're most likely not going to do most of the time. The interesting bit in the photo are the large air intakes / outlets, which point at th

Re: [Starlink] one dish per household is silly.

Le 13/11/2023 à 21:34, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : Caution - 250 kW peak sounds more like a horror movie (around 500 W average powers your average household) but there's an easy explanation. It's also a good example for why Reddit isn't a good source of information unless you know

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

Le 13/11/2023 à 17:03, David Lang a écrit : On Mon, 13 Nov 2023, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: It has a Donate button, which seems to make it a site built by an independent end user.  It is a great tool already!   With respect to the starlink sats positions: celestrak might simply

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

Le 12/11/2023 à 00:47, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : On 11/11/2023 6:09 pm, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: I want to say that I think this hexagon is an imaginative idea of the GUI designer.  I think it does not correspond to reality.  I am not sure about even the most basic

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

Le 30/10/2023 à 13:47, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : On 31/10/2023 1:03 am, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: It is indeed interesting. Le 30/10/2023 à 06:56, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : > > The main problem as it stands with Gaza would be to get Starlink > equ

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] one dish per household is silly.

Le 10/11/2023 à 13:55, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 7:33 AM Bill Woodcock wrote: On Nov 10, 2023, at 12:44, Dave Taht via Nnagain wrote: Steve song's analysis here: https://manypossibilities.net/2023/11/starlink-and-inequality/ He makes some good points. A

Re: [Starlink] one dish per household is silly.

Le 10/11/2023 à 13:21, Inemesit Affia via Starlink a écrit : Starlink terms of service as at launch with the round dishes required each user to pay regardless of the number of dishes. Not unusual compared to other ISP's. Of course you can share regardless. Cruise liners use 6 to 12 dishes to

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] one dish per household is silly.

Le 10/11/2023 à 17:40, David Lang a écrit : On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: I'm not understanding what you think Starlink is prohibiting here. Original poster (Dave, not me) provided this text: "There is no prohibition against sharing. The closest that document comes to it

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] one dish per household is silly.

Le 10/11/2023 à 17:40, David Lang a écrit : On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: I'm not understanding what you think Starlink is prohibiting here. Original poster (Dave, not me) provided this text: "There is no prohibition against sharing. The closest that document comes to it

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] one dish per household is silly.

Le 10/11/2023 à 13:33, Bill Woodcock via Starlink a écrit : On Nov 10, 2023, at 12:44, Dave Taht via Nnagain wrote: Steve song's analysis here: https://manypossibilities.net/2023/11/starlink-and-inequality/ He makes some good points. A) Am I the only person left in the world that shares h

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] one dish per household is silly.

Le 10/11/2023 à 14:44, David Lang a écrit : On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: There is no prohibition against sharing. The closest that document comes to it is: "The Standard Service Plan is designed for personal, family, or household use." And, th

Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] one dish per household is silly.

When I saw the subject line I thought the proposal was to add several dishes per household, but no. Le 10/11/2023 à 13:55, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 7:33 AM Bill Woodcock wrote: On Nov 10, 2023, at 12:44, Dave Taht via Nnagain wrote: Steve song's analysis her

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

Thanks for the reply. Le 31/10/2023 à 13:57, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : On 31/10/2023 2:30 am, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: > How they would oppose is a good question - I'm sure the Russians would > like to know, too. > From the public announcements, Rus

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

Le 30/10/2023 à 18:46, Daniel AJ Sokolov via Starlink a écrit : On 2023-10-29 at 09:26, Dave Taht via Starlink wrote: [...] There is an irony in this: Wasn't the internet a military project meant to survive armageddon? This is an excellent point, indeed. We want an originally-military techno

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

that the ham operators of the Arab world and elsewhere would necessarily desist from passing on messages of all sorts. On 31/10/2023 1:54 am, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: On the ham radio aspects: I thought ham radio use is restricted to those who would not emit political oppinion,

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

Le 30/10/2023 à 13:47, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : On 31/10/2023 1:03 am, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: It is indeed interesting. Le 30/10/2023 à 06:56, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : > > The main problem as it stands with Gaza would be to get Starlink > equ

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

On the ham radio aspects: I thought ham radio use is restricted to those who would not emit political oppinion, but rather talk about how ham radio works. In such a context, nobody would forbid ham radio. Also, it is very easy to jam purposefully, but it is very hard to identify when one is u

Re: [Starlink] "Interesting set of developments with Starlink. Musk says they will support "international aid orgs" in Gaza, Israel now says they will use "all available means" to stop SpaceX from doi

It is indeed interesting. Le 30/10/2023 à 06:56, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit : The main problem as it stands with Gaza would be to get Starlink equipment in for the international organisations to use. Coverage wouldn't be an issue, but power and bandwidth would be. I agree with the

Re: [Starlink] Main hurdles against the Integration of Satellites and Terrestial Networks

te: With the existence of solutions like OpenMTCProuter, SDWAN, policy based routing or any solution in general that allows combination in a sense of any number of IP links, I really don't see a point for specific solutions. Can anyone enlighten me? For home users an issue may be IP blocks

  1   2   >