This is a 2nd time I do this here, but let me this time put it bluntly,
and please excuse me if I am too direct. This is not a reproach to
anybody or anything, and I know this is current practice. It is just
that for me the practice is destabilizing. Probably I am myself a
little bit na3ive and I should probably upgrade to up to date practice.
That said, here it is:
I run this text on a detector called GPTZero. There are probably
other detectors. The detector says that the text has a probability of
97% of being AI-generated.
For my part, I had a doubt like that, and the tool seems to confirm my
doubt.
I think the proper way (AI netiquette?) to answer generated text is to
generate text. But I will not do that. I will reply separately with my
human-typed text.
Sorry if I disturb anyone or anything(?)
Alex
Le 02/03/2024 à 16:03, Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink a écrit :
Time synchronization, for satellite networks, faces several challenges:
1. Signal Propagation Delays: Unlike terrestrial networks where
signals travel through cables at the speed of light, satellite
communication involves signals traveling vast distances through space.
This creates significant delays.
2. Clock Drift: Even highly precise atomic clocks, used in satellites,
are susceptible to "drift" - gradually losing or gaining time. This
drift, caused by factors like temperature variations, radiation
exposure, and power fluctuations, can lead to inconsistencies in
timekeeping across the network.
3. Signal Degradation: As signals travel through space, they can
degrade due to factors like atmospheric interference, ionospheric
disturbances, and solar activity. This degradation can introduce noise
and errors, impacting the accuracy of time synchronization messages.
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
