Towards clarification,

The .mdb file of the ITU filing can be read with Excel (tab Data -> leftmost button 'Access').  The .mdb is on the web page of the ITU filing, at the bottom of the page. https://www.itu.int/ITU-R/space/asreceived/Publication/DisplayPublication/53068

It might be that this 'ESIAFI II' is just a name because of some reason.

There are some interesting dates like '06/03/2023', '13/03/2023' and '20/03/2023' and '6/10/2023'.

There is much data about orbits, powers, beams that I dont know how to interpret.  I would need the precise description of the database format, but I dont know where to get it from.

The frequencies are listed, as I interpret these fields: 123 GHz - 130 GHz centered on 126.5 GHz, 158.5-164 c 161.25 and 167-174.5 c 170.75.

About D-band: I am not sure what is precisely a 'D band' and I think that discussion about bands is very complicated.  I know there is wikipedia page about it, yes.

A person on twitter seems to be saying this filing is precisely the filing that spacex did at FCC; but comparing the numbers shows some differences: total sats per plane differ at some altitudes like at 525km altitude: ITU says 3600 sats whereas FCC says 3360 sats.  There can be speculations as to why they differ as there can be errors of various people including myself.

The person on twitter tells that ITU filing is in this table, but I dont know how he generated it.  Not sure whether he made some syntax error.

Altitude (km) Inclination (degrees) Satellites per Plane Planes Total Satellites
340     53      110     48      5280
345     46      110     48      5280
350     38      110     48      5280
360     96.9    120     30      3600
525 53 120 28 3600 [nota by me: FCC says 3360 and not 3600, see table below]
530     43      120     28      3600
535     33      120     28      3600
604     148     12      12      144
614     115.7   18      18      324


I found this earlier FCC document has this table at this URL https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-22-91A1.pdf  (not sure whether it is the most authoritative, but at least the mathematics 28*120 at altitude 525 does make sense to be 3360).

Altitude (km)  Inclination (degrees) Orbital Planes sats/plane Total sats

340 53                    48             110        5280

345 46                    48             110        5280

350 38                    48             110        5280

360 96.9                  30             120        3600

525 53                    28             120        3360 [nota by me: 28*120 == 3360 indeed]

530 43                    28             120        3360

535 33                    28             120        3360

604 148                   12             12         144

614 115.7                 18             18         324


Alex


Le 16/11/2023 à 10:30, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit :

Le 15/11/2023 à 16:48, David Fernández via Starlink a écrit :
I have got news about the recent filing by Starlink for the use of
frequencies in D-band:
https://www.itu.int/ITU-R/space/asreceived/Publication/DisplayPublication/53068
This has been done via Tonga, not the USA, and is for both, uplink and
downlink frequencies, although only downlink seems to be allocated now
for satellite use.

Thanks for the pointer.

It is the first time I hear about this 'ESIAFI II' constellation. I understand it is a different thing than the starlink existing constellation.

It adds to the list of plans of LEO Internet constellations (starlink, kuiper, oneweb etc.)

Alex


Regards,

David
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

Reply via email to