Le 02/03/2024 à 16:38, Christian von der Ropp via Starlink a écrit :
Why not acquire the time directly from by the satellite terminal and run local NTP servers instead of syncing via the Internet?

Certainly it is possible to run ntpd servers and clients on satellites and maintain synchronized times.  I would be surprised if some of them dont already do that.

The performance characteristics of some links between some satellites are not very different than links here on ground where NTP is run routinely.

NTP was designed and tested at a time when ground links had inferior perf. characteristics than many satcom links of recent years.

Alex


LEO satellite terminals always have onboard GNSS antennas for geolocation which is necessary to find the satellites, so integrating a local GNSS-disciplined Stratum-1 NTP server seems trivial to me.


Am 2. März 2024 17:25:59 OEZ schrieb Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>:

    Hi Sebastian,
    Can we still use PTP and NTP for time synchronization in 
    Satellite networks or we need new protocols? If we need new
    protocols, do such protocols exist?

    Thanks
    Hesham

    On Sat, Mar 2, 2024, 7:18 AM Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de>
    wrote:

        Hi Hesham

        > On 2. Mar 2024, at 16:03, Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink
        <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
        >
        > Time synchronization, for satellite networks, faces several
        challenges:
        > 1. Signal Propagation Delays: Unlike terrestrial networks
        where signals travel through cables at the speed of light,

        [SM] The speed of light in your typical glas fibers (and
        accidentally the information propagation speed in metallic
        conductors) comes in roughly at 2/3 of the speed of light in
        vacuum, while the speed of light in air at see level is a mere
        90 KM/s slower than in vacuum.

        > satellite communication involves signals traveling vast
        distances through space. This creates significant delays.

        [SM] Sure distances might be larger, but propagation speed is
        around 100000Km/s faster... my main point is speed of light is
        a) dependent on the medium b) not the things that
        differentiates space from the earth's surface here, but mere
        geometry and larger distances on larger spheres...

        > 2. Clock Drift: Even highly precise atomic clocks, used in
        satellites, are susceptible to "drift" - gradually losing or
        gaining time. This drift, caused by factors like temperature
        variations, radiation exposure, and power fluctuations, can
        lead to inconsistencies in timekeeping across the network.
        > 3. Signal Degradation: As signals travel through space, they
        can degrade due to factors like atmospheric interference,
        ionospheric disturbances, and solar activity. This degradation
        can introduce noise and errors, impacting the accuracy of time
        synchronization messages.
        > 4. Limited Resources: Satellites have limited power and
        processing capabilities. Implementing complex synchronization
        protocols can be resource-intensive, requiring careful
        optimization to minimize their impact on other functionalities.
        > 5. Evolving Technologies: As satellite technologies and
        applications continue to evolve, new challenges related to
        synchronization might emerge. For example, the integration of
        constellations with thousands of satellites poses unique
        synchronization challenges due to the sheer scale and
        complexity of the network.
        > These challenges necessitate the development of robust and
        efficient time synchronization protocols for satellite
        networks and an integrated satellite and terrestrial networks
        > Are you aware of such time synchronization protocols?
        > I would think that using Satellite simulators is the most
        viable way to develop and test these protocols given that
        using satellites is not that easy.
        > Thanks
        > Hesham
        >
        >
        >
        > _______________________________________________
        > Starlink mailing list
        > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
        > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

Reply via email to