Question:
Does Spam Assassin report the score (in the email or maillog) even if the
message is not tagged as spam?
Im using MailScanner to call Spam Assassin and I only see the score if it
is reported as a spam message.
Theo Van Dinter said:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:18:54PM -0600, Mark Ro
rack these numbers if you use MailScanner and
SpamAssassin.
Theo Van Dinter said:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:52:00PM -0500, Matt wrote:
>> Does Spam Assassin report the score (in the email or maillog) even if
>> the message is not tagged as spam?
>
> It's in the mes
Sorry for the typo...
I meant to say: "I can get that with the -t option"
Matt said:
> Aha.
>
> I cant get that with the spamassassin -t option.
>
> However, Im using MailScanner to call SpamAssassin. Alas, there is no
> way for the X-Spam-Status header to appear
Is there a place/mailing list that I can send a SPAM message that got
through my SA setup.
I'd like to have the SA wizards take a look at the message to see if there
is anything they can learn from it.
I can post it here, if that is proper.
ted at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 89.
[root local]# failed--compilation aborted
Can anyone tell me what this means and how to fix it? Are there any newer
rpm's to try? I would rather use an rpm since they give the option to
uninstall.
Thanks
Matt
_
; FYI: I always rebuild from the SRPM for this exact reason.
> It's really easy: "rpmbuild --rebuild "
>
> It'll generate a new binary RPM, then you can install it.
Sorry for the long post but see below.
Thanks
Matt
[root local]# rpm - e spamassassin
error: package s
t doesn't come back with anything, what version of perl do you
> have installed?
[root local]# perl -v
This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for i386-linux
I guess I need to update perl? How tough is this to do? How do I do it?
What are the chances it will crash the Ra
> Then, set your path to have that directory first (*) ie:
> PATH=/tmp:$PATH
> export PATH
Is there a way to take /tmp back out of the path after I am done?
Thanks!
Matt
> (*) - Note: This is a security issue if users can log into this machine
> or otherwise make files in th
Also, how do install it now? That is after I built the source rpm. I can't
even find it?
Thanks
Matt
> > Then, set your path to have that directory first (*) ie:
> > PATH=/tmp:$PATH
> > export PATH
>
> Is there a way to take /tmp back out of the path after I
ow do I update the locate database?
Thanks
Matt
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 09:47:43AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > [root /]# rpm --showrc | grep _rpmdir
> > -14: _rpmdir%{_topdir}/RPMS
>
> ok, now continue the chain looking for _topdir and so on. You will
> eventually get a full path.
>
> So for me:
>
> ecl
what I get. I give up.
Matt
> Matt I have installed SpamAssassin on both the cobalt RaQ3 and RaQ4
>
> To install I downloaded the RPM from this URL.
>
> http://www.hughes-family.org/spamassassin/
>
> Specifically this one
> http://www.hughes-family.org/spamassassin
59-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.7
Date: 13 Sep 2002 08:35:33 -0600
Message-Id: <1031927733.17653.27.camel@loghog>
Mime-Version: 1.0
ReSent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:39:20 +0100 (BST)
ReSent-From: Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ReSent-To:
edit /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
add the following line:
score RAZOR2_CHECK 0
any rule with score 0 is never run.
At 02:43 PM 10/10/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>I'm looking for a way to disable razor2, until I can find out what is
>causing it to fail.
>
>I can't find anything
Could you be more specific than " I have "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in my
spamassassin conf file."?
What exact SA command did you use? whitelist_from? whitelist_from_rcvd?
Please include the exact whole line that's whitelisting this. Also, which
spamasssassin conf file did you add it to? local.c
Is it just me, or did you forget to include the message that tricked SA?
I seem to have gotten a set of full headers, but no message.
My suggestion, put the email back together again and run it through
command-line spamassassin -tD and see what it says. Often errors in
configuration aren't men
I don't think there's been a full GA run done since it was added, but if
you browse the saDev list you can see people posting the test-rule freqs
against their portions of the corpus. For example, on 10/10 Justin Mason
reported (among a ton of other test rules):
0.9572.9570.0031
Hmm, I'm guessing the user your running spamd as can't read the SA config
files for some reason.
It's just a guess, but since it thought the required hits were 0, this
tells me it might have been completely unconfigured.
This might also happen if spamc times out trying to connect to spamd.
Aga
Really short spams are something SA alone isn't very good at. Fortunately
systems like Razor are wonderful at them, and the DNS blacklists help too:
Using 2.42 I get:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.9
tests=CTYPE_JUST_HTML,MSGID_CHARS_SPAM,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_DSBL,
and respond. Unlikely yes,
but it is still possible.
I'd rather put forth effort on adding features to SA which aren't likely to
be already present in procmail. Better rules, faster processing, better GA
scoring, better input data (corpus), etc.
At 09:16 PM 10/11/2002 -0600, you wrote:
At 08:34 AM 1/15/04 -0500, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
Why does HABEAS_SWE score -8.0? EVERYmessage that I recieve that matches
that criteria is spam. I've since added 16 point to HABEAS_SWE.
Read the archives of this list.. this has been discussed almost nonstop
since the weekend...
or read www.habeas.c
At 11:14 AM 1/15/04 +0100, Gunther Heintzen wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=3.9 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.61
It should be autolearn=no because hits=2.6 ist beetween 0.1 and 12.0
Autolearning is not based on the normal message score, it's based o
At 09:49 AM 1/15/04 +0100, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
Simple starting things to check (if you're not already doing them)
1) use razor, dcc and/or pyzor.
2) Make sure your bayes is heavily trained (really, this batch of "poison"
has not been
At 07:50 AM 1/15/2004, Tim B wrote:
Hey does anyone know if there are any spamassassin books comming out?
None that I'm aware of.
I've been thinking of writing more guides to go with the rule-writing guide
I made, but haven't started yet.
--
At 07:11 AM 1/15/2004, Adrian Simmons wrote:
I have a setup involving procmail, SA and Razor, at the moment, every time
I do a razor-report (with "| /usr/bin/spamassassin -r" in my procmailrc)
my mail spool gets poisoned with something like this:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.
Hi Marc,
Have you added a line to tell SA what you want the subject line to be
changed to?
Along with the rewrite_subject line, try adding a "subject_tag" like
subject_tag[SPAM]
Or
subject_tag***SPAM***
HTH,
Matt
Fr
At 02:59 PM 1/15/2004, Pierre Thomson wrote:
For some reason, my users don't like to receive these
non-communications. They slip right past SA with only a BAYES_99 penalty,
not enough to stop them. I could add a SUBJECT_MISSING test but it can't
have a high score; any other bright ideas?
BAYE
mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
Hi John,
Can you please post the headers from the message in question, without
that we won't be able to help much...
Thanks,
matt
---
The S
At 03:37 PM 1/15/2004, John Fleming wrote:
Newbie question - I just got one of those d-rug type emails that scored
several points above my spam cutoff and wasn't on a whitelist, yet the
subject wasn't tagged as expected. What can cause that? tnx
are you sure it was above and not a large negative
At 03:41 PM 1/15/2004, Alan Munday wrote:
Just had the mail below trigger on:
2.0 MY_HTTP_ODD_PORT URI: Link to a server on nonstandard port
Why Vailresorts would want to go to the effort of declaring port 80 in their
link is a mystery.
However it is clearly not a non-standard port.
Note:
At 04:01 PM 1/15/2004, Andrew Cranson wrote:
Would it be possible for an additional mysql preferance for a threshold to
be added to an upcoming spamassassin release for mail deletion? e.g. A
user sets required_hits to 5, and sets deletion_hits to 10, any mail
between 5 and 10 is tagged, anything ab
UM Message contains URL that Brian wants to catch
scoreBI_U_RIDNUM 0.001
Hope I didn't mess that up and watch out for line wraps
-matt
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on
At 05:23 PM 1/15/2004, Brian Ipsen wrote:
What would a rule look like to match a pattern like (I've read a little
about matching, but not enough to get it working):
http://(anything).(com|net|org|info)?rid=[0-9]{1,5}
use the uri ruletype.. it will only search within web links:
uri MY_URI_RULE /\
At 08:01 PM 1/15/2004, Theodore Heise wrote:
My problem is that now Bayes doesn't seem to be working right, as if
SA is ignoring my learned tokens? It also seems to be now missing
some rules that I presume are default (e.g., MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT,
PRIORITY_NO_NAME, and CLICK_BELOW) The results for
At 08:05 PM 1/15/2004, Adrian Simmons wrote:
After running SA with the -D switch when reporting it looks like there
might be some problems with my Razor installation:
Jan 15 12:29:55.046480 report[14997]: [ 6] computing sigs for mail 1.0,
len 9577
Jan 15 1razor2 report failed: Bad file descripto
At 06:49 PM 1/15/2004, Alice Pawlowich wrote:
Can someone please help me to remove, unsubscribe or disable the spam
assassin? I am a new computer owner and really didn't know what I was
getting into. But do know that I opened an attachment that contained a
virus. I open a lot off these spam warn
At 07:56 AM 1/16/04 -0500, Theodore Heise wrote:
cat tmp | formail -s sendmail theo
Apparently this must process the mail differently than the normal
receiving routine. If I use "bounce" in Pine, the Bayes results are
approximately the same as before adding the new rules. I don't
quite underst
At 09:03 AM 1/16/04 -0500, Segree, Gareth wrote:
Text => Rule
1) Received: from [109.42.168.192] by 24.193.45.130 with HTTP => Received
=~ /with HTTP/i
That works..
2) Subject: ?ISO-8859-1? => Subject =~ /(ISO-8859|iso-8859)/ (score = 3.0)
Won't work.. that's a character encoding tag
At 10:03 AM 1/16/04 +0530, Rahul Baweja wrote:
Hi,
How can i check if the Spam Assassin is working or not?
send yourself a GTUBE:
http://www.spamassassin.org/gtube/
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on
At 09:55 AM 1/16/2004, Michael H. Collins wrote:
line in Spamassassin configuration, skipping: report_header 1
Failed to parse line in Spamassassin configuration, skipping: defang_mime 0
but it has been working for a couple of months through upgrades. And
those lines look good in the local.cf
Due to the fun of online pharmacies, I've made this ruleset in my spare time.
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
It's not perfect, and needs some cleanup and some more obfuscated variants
added in.
However some of the rather abusive pill-spammers of late have made me
decide t
Due to the LARGE number of emails coming in citing the same suggestion,
I'll publicly explain one of the rules.
I very much on purpose did not use "." for __DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION7 and
__DRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION8.
I very purposefully match \W in one, and _ in the other. Between the two it
will mat
At 01:13 PM 1/16/2004, Carl Chipman wrote:
For the new people on the list, I was wondering what the following acronyms
mean:
LART
Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool.
See http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/L/LART.html
UBE/UCE
Unsolicited Bulk Email / Unsolicited Commercial Email.
-
On Friday, January 16, 2004 @ 10:13:21 AM [-0700], Carl Chipman wrote:
> LART
Linux Advanced Radio Terminal
> UBE/UCE
Upper Body Excerciser/Unforeseen Circumstances Excepted
acronymfinder.com :)
--
Matt
-
At 04:26 PM 1/16/2004, David Roback wrote:
spamd[28929]: debug: RBL: success for 1 of 1 queries
There is a line for a RBL query, but shouldn't the RBL tests shop up in
the "tests line" in the debug log? If RBL is not running site wide, any
ideas why?
The thing that strikes me most about that li
Fixes a few minor issues:
1) corrected spelling of sildenafil citrate.
2) added vigara to the v-word mis-spelling list
3) added optional leading and trailing gap-characters to the gapped
versions of rules.
4) added some gapped and obfu versions of Cilais
5) added some commentary
--
he
increase into your local.cf or user_prefs file.
If you wanted to increase EXCUSE_2 from the default of 0 to 1 point, use
the following line:
score EXCUSE_2 1.0
HTH,
matt
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open
At 03:02 PM 1/18/04 +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
I get:
debug: Razor Agents 1.20, protocol version 2.
razor 1.20 is a very old version of razor, and 1.x versions are no longer
supported by SA.
try getting razor 2.36 and applying the taint-safeness patch.
--
At 11:22 PM 1/18/04 +0100, PieterB wrote:
What's the best practice preventing this? Changing SpamAssassin in
some way, masquerading/munging Received-headers, or something else?
1) work with the RBL to get de-listed
2) change ISPs to move your IP to a different block.
And that's about it.. The fac
ECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Kettler
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 12:06 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk
Subject: [SAtalk] [RD] antidrug 0.2 available
Fixes a few minor issues:
1) corrected spelling of sildenafil citrate.
2) added vigara to the v-word mis-spelling list
3) added optional leading and trailin
At 08:23 PM 1/18/04 -0500, Gerry Doris wrote:
My ip is listed in SORBS for the simple reason that it is in a dynamic
block of addresses administered by my ISP. SORBS just states that I
should use my ISP mail server which I already do.
Since SORBS only adds 0.10 to the spamassassin total I'm not co
At 05:49 PM 1/18/04 -0800, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
Problem with this fix is it only fixes things for my users locally - when my
users send mail to someone else, they would have to set the same networks as
trusted.
This is untrue..
What ALL affected admins must do is set trusted_networks to is _the
At 04:25 AM 1/19/2004, Mrvka Andreas wrote:
hi,
i've made a dump of my bayes db but i don't
know exactly the columns.
please explain them.
thanks.
Andrew
Let's use this fictitious example line:
0.029 0 2 1071094490 word
The above line indicates:
0.029: the calculated spam pr
At 10:40 AM 1/19/2004, John Fleming wrote:
Does that use timing from the sender's computer time, ISP times, or what?
It compares the date and time of the "Date:" header against the timestamps
added into the Received: headers by the various mail relays.
since the error is in the 6-12 hour range,
At 11:16 AM 1/19/2004, Claude Frantz wrote:
But when messages
are passed via sendmail (dual config) and amavis, the config file
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf is not used.
What is wrong here ?
what signs of said failure are you seeing? Keep in mind that any
spam-markup changes you apply to loc
only see one rule triggered per email. Recent corpus
check showed 0 ham hits (Thanks Bob!).
These rules are not available in stores, but can be picked up at:
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/evilnumbers.cf
http://www.yackley.org/sa-rules/evilnumbers.cf
Enjoy!
Matt Yackley
One more suggestion, in addition to reducing the score for HABEAS_SWE, if
you use bayes, I'd suggest telling bayes to ignore SWE headers.
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-1
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-2
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-3
bayes_ignore_header X-Habeas-SWE-4
bayes_ignore_header
At 11:27 AM 1/19/2004, Ron Culler wrote:
I'm having problems with forged headers allowing email with the habeas
tags. What is the best way to force a score for habeas tagged email? I
use spamassassin with spamd and sql based user black/white lists but a
common bayes db.
put something similar to t
|-|\.)0292|286(\s|-|\.)2187)/
--example--
Hopefully they won't start writing them as (555)(555)(), but I guess
if they do, that will also be a great spam sign!
I plan on testing Sylvain's idea as well, keep the comments, questions &
suggestions coming.
-matt
-
that are worried
about false positives caused by the original version. You should only run
one of those files.
Jen has a short explanation on her site:
http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm
HTH,
matt
---
The SF.Net email is sponsore
nate set with "[\s\(\)\-\.]+" now, so far so good.
I'll also take a look at \W+ and \W* to see if it looks like they could FP
on attachments or such.
Thanks for the syntax tips
-matt
"Can't wait to see what phone numbers in spam will look like in a few
weeks" ;)
ne.org/search.php?query=habeas&email=&group=spamassassin&sort=date
-matt
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of
le which spamassassin will read for rules in ~.spamassassin/
would be user_prefs.
HTH,
matt
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse
At 09:02 PM 1/19/04 +0100, Anders Sveen wrote:
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range. Nothing
more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing dynamic, but
then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by mailservers and then it
actually made sense. It doesn
At 12:27 PM 1/20/04 +, Adrian Simmons wrote:
Is there an easy way to get a total of the spam/ham in the bayes db? I've
noticed the total come up in the log when running SA in debug mode, and
one could probably dump the db and go hunting for the magic numbers, but
is there really nothing easi
At 09:13 AM 1/20/04 -0500, David Roback wrote:
debug: DNS MX records found: 0
Shouldn't I be seeing more than 1 query for all messages?
Hmm.. looks like your DNS is flaking out.. I'm pretty sure you should
always have at least one MX success from the DNS_AVAILABLE test...
What happens further
Are you sure you want that rule to be case sensitive, lower-case only?
try
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/i
(note the added i at the end)
At 11:48 AM 1/20/04 +, David Logan wrote:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
scor
At 11:49 AM 1/20/04 +0800, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
Hello folks!
I wanted to update my bigevil list but when I did a locate on them I got this:
/var/amavis/.spamassassin/bigevil.cf
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf
Now I really forgot where the correct location is. Both files are identical.
I know bi
At 09:54 PM 1/19/04 -0500, Barry Jaspan wrote:
The OPT_HEADER (in 2.5x and 2.6x) rule does not make much sense to me:
header __OPT_HEADER_SUBJALL =~
/^(?:Resent-)?Subject:.*opt.?(in|out|oem|ed|ion-in|[EMAIL PROTECTED])(?:\b|\d|\@)/im
header __OPT_HEADER_ALL ALL =~
/opt.?(?:in|out|oem|ed|
At 08:49 AM 1/20/04 -0600, Scott Williams , Area4 wrote:
I just started using the FVGT rules and got this FP.
Do I understand this right, the rule below penalizes (scores high) anyone
with a .us domain?
Yes, but it only penalizes them when used in a web-page link. Your From:
address, etc won't c
At 10:50 AM 1/20/2004, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
Hi,
How can I change the text that is included in tagged
messages, that includes the servername and also includes my
email address?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
see the "report" and "clear_report_template" options.
(note: don't edit 10_misc.cf..
Changes:
-now catches some gapped-and-obfuscated v-words.
on a test-list of 100 v-word spellings v 0.2 caught 37 of them. v 0.3
catches 65. more improvements in the works.
(thanks for the list Gary)
comments at top have a link to where the file comes from
The ruleset is located at:
If you want your server to be in german, tell it.
export LANG=de
note: this may affect other programs on the system that are language-smart
as well.
At 12:01 PM 1/20/2004, Christopher Kunz wrote:
just a quick question: How do I enable localized rule descriptions?
There's a lot of german rule d
At 12:14 PM 1/20/2004, Kenneth Andresen wrote:
Will SA-learn filter all mails for everybody using the same rules, or
how can it work with different rule set for each user/mail account?
by default bayes databases and rulesets are specific to the user that
executes SA (note: that's execution, which
At 12:24 PM 1/20/2004, Pat Traynor wrote:
Spamassassin a couple of times, and I have to suspect that a new version
changed things. Is this something that I can configure somewhere?
start off with spamassassin --lint
I suspect you've got some old and invalid things like defang_mime that are
causi
sounds like you're making your own version of bigevil.cf.
Chris S found that memory usage was greatly reduced by using regex combos
to reduce the number of rules.
At 12:31 PM 1/20/2004, Dan Kennedy wrote:
How efficient are URI rules? I am probably going to have several hundred
of these rules, an
At 01:52 PM 1/20/2004, JRiley wrote:
Just curious, if there is a script (be it perl or otherwise), that anyone
has written, that will perform an automated 'download' of the different
SARE (or other) SA rulesets?
I wouldn't think this would too difficult to do, and have a scheduled
restart of th
'magic' :) Well, at least for me.
The above statement is rather amusing when you re-read your original question..
"one could probably dump the db and go hunting for the magic numbers"
Apparently you only subconsciously knew what the term "magic" meant :)
Thank
At 04:33 PM 1/20/04 +0100, Ralf Vitasek wrote:
i tested many things with the trusted users settings and googled around
but i had no luck so far.
except that i stumbled on a posting from this lists archive that makes me
think that something is broken and that it would be fixed in the upcoming
2.
At 11:56 AM 1/21/04 +0100, Jürgen R. Plasser wrote:
Is there any way to get rid (say: score > 5) of those mails with SA? Some
rules?
I have SA 2.61 and the latest Bigevel rules installed.
Well, antidrug is a good start.
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/antidrug.cf
At 12:37 AM 1/21/04 -0500, Pedro Sam wrote:
My question, should
bayes ignore the habeas headers by default?
Perhaps not by default, but right now it's probably a good idea.
In general, any sudden shift of behavior from something commonly seen only
in nonspam to commonly seen in both causes troubl
At 10:41 PM 1/20/04 -0600, C. Bensend wrote:
Is the problem that I'm _forwarding_ the tagged emails from one host
to the other? I don't have the capability to bounce, I can only forward.
A forwarded message is a brand new message. That brand new message is NOT
sa tagged, even though it may con
At 09:51 AM 1/21/2004, Nicholson, Rob wrote:
We've been looking and trialling No Spam Today which is based upon
spamassasin. When we first tried it, it was catching probably 99% of all
spam. However, over the past three months this figure has decreased
noticeably. It appears to be because spamme
At 10:55 AM 1/21/2004, Paul Diaguila wrote:
X-Spam-Score: 1.8
BAYES_30,HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,OACYS_CONS_6,RM_rb_ANCHOR,RM_rb_BODY,RM_rb_HTML,RM_sl_Parens,SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST
What am I missing?
What version of SA are you running?
At 10:36 AM 1/21/2004, Jody Cleveland wrote:
I'm running spamassassin 2.62 with MailScanner on redhat 9. What I'm
trying to run is this:
sa-learn -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf --spam --mbox
/var/spool/mail/bayes
But, it just sits there. Sa-learn --rebuild and --force-expire work
fine
Well, your rule is pretty wildly off.. ToCc is going to look for a header
named ToCc, not To headers and/or CC headers.
header __TO_EXISTS exists:to
header __CC_EXISTS exists:cc
meta NO_TO_OR_NO_CC (!__TO_EXISTS || !__CC_EXISTS)
Or perhaps you want
meta NO_TO_AND_N
At 01:02 PM 1/21/2004, st semps wrote:
You see I thought that ToCc was valid. I thought I had read that
somewhere. Obviously Im wrong.
Actually, it apparently is valid.. my bad..
However, the string returned won't contain the To: or Cc: parts, just the
email addresses.
--
Correction: the rm should rm bayes.lock, not bayes_*.lock. My typo.
At 01:41 PM 1/21/2004, Jody Cleveland wrote:
Here's what I get:
debug: Syncing Bayes journal and expiring old tokens...
debug: lock: 21404 created
/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes.lock.mystique.winnefox.org.21404
debug: lock: 21404 tr
At 01:41 PM 1/21/2004, Jody Cleveland wrote:
Here's what I get:
debug: Syncing Bayes journal and expiring old tokens...
debug: lock: 21404 created
/etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes.lock.mystique.winnefox.org.21404
debug: lock: 21404 trying to get lock on /etc/MailScanner/bayes/bayes
with 0 retries
The t
Thanks to Sylvain, Doug K. & Chris P. for their ideas on improving the rules!
Changes:
Added some more entries (many more to come within the next few days, just
need time to process them)
Changed "(\s|-|\.)" in phone numbers to "\W+", file should require less
memory to run, is easier to read and
At 02:00 PM 1/21/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The spam I was trying to catch doesn't seem to be going through the rules
I added. What else do I have to do?
I'd start off with a run of spamassassin --lint to make sure you don't have
a typo.
After that, if it still doesn't work check the debug ou
At 04:56 PM 1/21/2004, you wrote:
Hi
SA offers the possibility of having a "smarter" whitelist which
whitelists only if the sending relay is "related" to the sending email,
like
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
is there a possibility to somehow do the opposite, ie
"blacklist [E
Why not change your domain whitelist to a whitelist_from_rcvd command,
instead of whitelist_from.
You'll avoid the forgery problem outright.
At 04:43 PM 1/21/2004, Brad Hazledine wrote:
Has anyone written a rule that catches mail supposedly sent by yourself to
yourself?
Example here...
Receive
At 06:56 PM 1/21/2004, Kelson Vibber wrote:
I suspect he did:
>At 04:43 PM 1/21/2004, Brad Hazledine wrote:
>>However, the rule seems to pick up the "by fargo.caledoncard.com" in the
>>header and thinks that all is well.
No, he did not use whitelist_from_rcvd.
If you bring in more context, rather
At 10:52 PM 1/21/2004, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote:
I've been told this can filter legitimate mail.
Agreed Mitch.. if you read the rest of my message, I had a long warning
about that.
courier added a freemail concept, BUT, the yahoo servers send directly
from the
webmail appliances, which are not mx
I would have posted this sooner, but the editor I use on my home machine
got mangled and won't run. (yay, time for a physical disk test).
Changes:
-Added an optional X to the end of the v-drug test, to catch another spelling.
-Fixed a typo in the mis-spelled c-drug test.
-added a few c
At 08:21 PM 1/21/04 -0600, George Matos wrote:
I just got my domain name and am trying to setup spam assassin. I have
never used it before so I was looking for some setup instructions etc.
what kind of MTA (mailserver software) are you running? What OS/distro are
you running it on?
-
At 01:05 AM 1/22/2004, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
I have attached a few mails that are still getting through.
These are scoring extremely low.
The number of mails like these that slip through is on the increase.
Any ideas as to how I can block them?
I am using SA2.62, Exim 4.30 (with the exiscan 4.
Define "refuses to send it to the list"?
Does it bounce, or has it just not shown up yet?
The sourceforge.net lists are on occasion incredibly slow.. 4-hour posting
delays are NOT unheard of, although uncommon.
Just because it takes a while, don't assume it's not in the queue.. sf.net
processe
so domains but I'm at a 78%/28%
spam/ham ratio! Egads.
--
Matt
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity.
1 - 100 of 1768 matches
Mail list logo
