cat tmp | formail -s sendmail theo
Apparently this must process the mail differently than the normal receiving routine. If I use "bounce" in Pine, the Bayes results are approximately the same as before adding the new rules. I don't quite understand the difference, but would welcome any explanations folks might care to offer.
Hmm, does formail wind up generating a new set of message headers?
Typicaly this is what happens..
If you want to relaibly retest a message as you make changes, don't email it anywhere.. instead, just run it through SA directly:
spamassassin -t < tmp
(note: the -t will force SA to generate a spam report, even if the message isn't over the threshold. The full report is quite useful when testing however)
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
