Just had the mail below trigger on:
2.0 MY_HTTP_ODD_PORT URI: Link to a server on nonstandard port
Why Vailresorts would want to go to the effort of declaring port 80 in their link is a mystery.
However it is clearly not a non-standard port.
Note: when referencing add-on rules, be sure to mention where they came from...
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/SaUriCustomRules?version=10
That said, it looks like MY_HTTP_ODD_PORT is 100% redundant anyway..
2.6x ships with the rule WEIRD_PORT, which is better written... The standard weird_port rule ignores ports 80, 443 and 8080. and it doesn't score as high as 2.0.
I'd suggest regarding MY_HTTP_ODD_PORT as both broken and obsoleted by the standard built-in ruleset.
20_uri_tests.cf:uri WEIRD_PORT m{https?://[^/\s]+?:\d+(?<!:80)(?<!:443)(?<!:8080)(?:/|\s|$)}
50_scores.cf:score WEIRD_PORT 1.345 1.944 0.554 1.407
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
