I don't think there's been a full GA run done since it was added, but if you browse the saDev list you can see people posting the test-rule freqs against their portions of the corpus. For example, on 10/10 Justin Mason reported (among a ton of other test rules):
0.957 2.957 0.003 1.00 0.95 0.01 T_FROM_OFFERS That's pretty good statistics so far (2.957% of spam hit, 0.003% of nonspam), but how it will score when the the full corpus is tested and the GA is run is yet to be seen. Nobody else has done a report which contains T_FROM_OFFERS so far. Maybe I'll run one against my micro-corpus this weekend and post it on saDev. At 12:35 PM 10/11/2002 -0500, Robert Strickler wrote: >Following up on the offers (should now test for offer[sz]) in the headers >these also seem to be seen frequently in the headers as usernames or >embedded in domain names. > >waaay back Malte said: > > > | | Subject: Re: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping > > | | spam > > | | > > | | AFAIK did we have such a rule in 70_cvs_rules_under_test.cf and > > | | the > > | | GA sorted it out (there's too much valid commerical mail send from > > | | offers@*). > >Actually, we didn't -- we had other similar ones, but I don't think "offers" >(note the plural!) was in there. It looks like it's actually a good test >(on my corpus at least), so I've put it in the CVS set for testing... ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
