Is it just me, or did you forget to include the message that tricked SA? I seem to have gotten a set of full headers, but no message.
My suggestion, put the email back together again and run it through command-line spamassassin -tD and see what it says. Often errors in configuration aren't mentioned until you run spamassassin this way, or with --lint. -tD also provides a lot of other clues about the decisions SA is making. At 08:49 AM 10/11/2002 -0700, John McCoy, Jr. wrote: >Not sure how but this message ended up with a required score of zero! >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=0 >I was mistakenly still running 2.50-CVS (2.42 proper now, just fixed) >All messages received right before and after have the required=5 >I forwarded to my test system that is running 2.42 and got the same >results, very weird. > > >Full header follows the rest of the email available if you need it. > >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
