[SAtalk] latest 2.0 broke this morning?

th ESMTP id g0IE5r324660 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:05:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:05:53 -0500 (EST) From: Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Ve

[SAtalk] All Caps

First thank you for fixing the SUBJECT header catch and adding a rule in for the ALL_CAPS_SUBJECT. Excellent Idea. Would all caps checks on the others like... TO FROM CONTENT-TYPE Be another test to add? - Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED

[SAtalk] spamc and users

hosts where the mail is not directly delivered only able to go with the default system configuration? Thanks, Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamass

[SAtalk] RBL's and the local network

still get tagged. Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] Web Based Front End

welcome. Thanks, Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Web Based Front End

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Jason wrote: > > I finally finished a web based front end for SpamAssassin with SQL and > have gotten permission from my employer to release it as open source. > > You can check it out at http://www.wkrp.com/webusasin/ > I goofed in the source. Sorry I

Re: [SAtalk] Web Based Front End

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Rick Macdougall wrote: > What happened? It appears to be gone now. > Ok that's two for me. I tarred I but forgot the gzip part. It should be fine now. My first project that I've actually put things out on so I'

[SAtalk] Nigeria Scam not working?

atus" at ../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line 1098. ) Otherwise I'd move up to the latest and try it again. Thanks, Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] greylist?

in just by duplicating check_to_in_whitelist and make it only grab the To's. Just a thought. Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] X-info

I'm seeing some spam coming in with X-Info headers mentioning "To report abuse forward this mail to..." It's being marked as spam (which it is). I'm wondering with all the data that's been collected is it worth checking for the X-info with an excuse or not? J

[SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown

Looks like ORBZ has been shutdown... As seen on slashdot http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/20/1528246&mode=thread&tid=111 Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourcef

[SAtalk] Simson talks about Spam Assassin

I don't know if this has been mentioned before... Came across his mailing list this morning. http://www.simson.net/pipermail/simsoft/2002-May/08.html Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Don't miss the 2002

Re: [SAtalk] OT SA policy for ISP usage

Same here. This, I feel offers the best protection because it makes it the end user's responsibility for what they do with the messages. On 8/19/03 7:21 PM, "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We send all email through spamassassin but do no actual filtering. ALL > email i

[SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

This message made is past SpamAssassin without setting off ANYTHING? (Score of 0.0.) Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: by bluehome.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.3) with PIPE id 360205; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:05:04 -0700 Received: from [68.198.199.174] (HELO atlantech.fr) by bluehome.net

Re: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

No. I use CGPSA to get the messages to CommuniGate Pro. I think it's interesting that it "Identified non-spam (0.0/5.0) for in 0.0 seconds" Seems too quick. Anyway, here's the message. 12:12:30.24 4 EXTFILTER(CGPSA) out(25): 54 FILE Queue/360223.msg\n 12:12:30.28 2 PWD-00035([127.0.0.1]) '[EMAI

Re: [SAtalk] Spam with score of 0.0

That seems to be it. For whatever reason, /etc/mail/spamassassin was empty. It is corrected now & messages are receiving scores. HOORAY! :-) On 9/7/03 8:55 PM, "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would guess that's not finding the config files -- if there's no > rules, it'll run throug

[SAtalk] self generated black hole list

for each spam or non spam seen up to a certain threshold. That way normal messages who only tickle the rules could still have a chance to get through. Just a thought... - Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by

[SAtalk] Gibberish email addresses

this be of use? The affects would be small but I'd imagine every little bit helps. Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed

[SAtalk] rd.yahoo.com

s to Yahoo! for making is easier on spammers to obfuscate their spam site names... Is there a good reason not to just score those rd.yahoo's high? Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention

Re: [SAtalk] Missed this spam

e below... Maybe someone can come up with a good rule for garbage. Jason Portwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] junk mail follows NEVER AGAIN BE EMBARRASSED ABOUT YOUR SIZE GainzwfkbPro has helped over 700,000 men worldwideSome benefits include: * Gain up to 3 Full Inche

[SAtalk] any known bugs with blank spamassassin reports?

ports? -- Jason Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ No witty signature available at this time ~ --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[SAtalk] no whitelist defined, but a spam passed the USER_IN_WHITELIST check?

_NAME_NO_SPACES, MSGID_CHARS_SPAM, DEAR_SOMEBODY, DOUBLE_CAPSWORD, USER_IN_WHITELIST) -- Jason Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ No witty signature available at this time ~ --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://ww

[SAtalk] help diagnose a mis-tagged email (not spam, tagged as spam)

here a way with mailscanner + spamassassin to not scan mail originating from my network? -- Jason Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ No witty signature available at this time ~ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to ge

[SAtalk] Is punctuation really needed? (fwd)

that. I've had one spammer who just puts a random period in the message and it doesn't get tagged. Taking out all the periods in the message and it scored a 10.6 just from the body of the message. Just a thought. Jason Portwood [

[SAtalk] mrtg

spam versus clean messages based on syslog'd information if they were interested. Thanks, Jason mc3:~ # cat /etc/mrtg/load.cfg WorkDir: /usr/local/apache/htdocs/mrtg WithPeak[_]: ymw Options[_]: growright, gauge, nopercent, nolegend, nobanner, noo #AbsMax[_]: 40 XSize[_]: 500 YSize[_]: 160 T

RE: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines.

Read the first email! He's using qmail-scanner.pl The default config for that sets fast_spamassassin, ie. spamc -c -f. this will not return the full spamassassin report to qmail-scanner you need to turn off the -c option. I know this is in the list archives I have answered it before. -Ori

RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been combined into 1 Set

rmation from me I'd be happy to provide what is needed. Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer Wheeler Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been com

RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been combined into 1 Set

1.0 Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: desfull J_BACKHs Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: defulls Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer Wheeler Sent: Wednesday, Jan

RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been combined into 1 Set

Thanks, that is better, but I am still showing a parse error on j_backhair_37. Thanks for your patience. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer Wheeler Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:37 AM To: 'Jason Crowe'; [EMAIL

RE: [SAtalk] Popcorn & Backhair have been combined into 1 Set

Okay, I think I found out what went wrong. I think emacs is doing something to the file when I paste the rule set into it. Sorry and thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Crowe Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:47 AM To

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin on Qmail Relay

The email might be to large and aren't getting scanned. What are your spamc options? You can use the '-s' to bump up the max message size when calling it. There is someplace else it's set to but I can't remember where. spamc -s 35 -Original Message- From: Atif Faruqui [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: [SAtalk] Razor server timeout problems ?

5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm "thrill.cloudmark.com" responds normally, except it returns "mail # is not spam" for all mail. A quick grepmail of my user mailboxes finds that RAZOR2_* rule hits stopped sometime yesterday, no hits today. * Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Excel.Net,Inc. -

[SAtalk] Problem with regex

the stock SA ruleset already does. I'm familiar with perl regexps, and this regexp works in a perl program without catching the word 'testing'. SA seems to be ignoring the NOT (^) portion of [^e] (for example), instead matching 'e' instead of not matchine

Re: [SAtalk] why did this trigger?

der. Any mail that actually does come from hotmail user has this header. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect (703)786-8036 (cellular) Red Hat Professional Consulting (703)456-2940 (office) _

Re: [SAtalk] why did this trigger?

On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:38:48PM -0500, dman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:22:30PM -0500, Jason Kohles wrote: > | On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:20:29PM -0500, dman wrote: > | > > | > A legit message triggered the > | > FROM_FORGED_HOTMAIL > | > test.

[SAtalk] How about a exit-code reporting option?

d over a network, this could really reduce the load... What I'm looking at doing is moving Qmail-Scanner to a points-based system (like SpamAssassin and others), and to be able to incorporate SpamAssassin's "hits" with other filters decisions. Comments? Stupid idea? :-) -- Cheers

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from -- case sensitivity?

ortant, but the RFC does allow them to if they wish. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect (703)786-8036 (cellular) Red Hat Professional Consulting (703)456-2940 (office) ___

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist_from -- case sensitivity?

it was funky > and decided to bounce it off the list. :-) > Maybe I misunderstood the conversation when I replied =) RFC 822 only specifies that the local-part of the address have it's case maintained, the domain-name part is not included, and I'm pretty sure the DNS relate

[SAtalk] Missing (documented) feature in 2.01?

entiment about virus scanners vs spam. In Qmail-Scanner, the SpamAssassin support merely tags the messages as spam - it doesn't quarantine them like it does for viruses. Still too many false alerts I'm afraid - a lot of my Email from root cronjobs gets caught! ;-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Informat

[SAtalk] SA 2.01 mistaking MIME description for spam

r see that area these days... [hmm, great way of sneaking stuff out... ;-)] -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL P

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.01 mistaking MIME description for spam

e name could be made more generic, as this isn't just an Exchange issue. How about "body MIME_EXPLANATION"? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamass

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.01 mistaking MIME description for spam

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:33:00AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > How about "body MIME_EXPLANATION"? With language issues rearing it's ugly head (or beautiful ;-), we could do the job "properly" - but I don't know if SA is up to it. You could record the boundary str

[SAtalk] Documentation change: more references to "-F" option needed :-)

:-), then "spamd -F 1" is your friend? People aren't doing this, and are then wondering why all their mail is corrupted. This isn't a bug - but it is catching a few sites... [it didn't catch me - honest!! :-)] Thanks -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager T

Re: [SAtalk] Documentation change: more references to "-F" option needed :-)

n't use that > config, and am liable to misdocument things), want to knock something up > and forward a patch? OK, it should go into http://spamassassin.org/sitewide.html -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9

Re: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner?

disables user config files, disables generation of a leading "From " header [that will break mail otherwise!], and only does local tests (as I believe RBL/etc tests are better done by the MTA). Works, works, works. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Tri

Re: [SAtalk] Variations on To/From headers

pam may be inappropriate. This is 100% always indicative of a M$ Outlook user. H, second thoughts, classify it as spam ;-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

em-wide - i.e. that only works if you're calling SA after local delivery (where Return-Path headers are usually added). -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417

[SAtalk] This one shot through SA

ng/e/i1/i71.htm Probably should be added to RATWARE at least? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 --- Begin Message --- ´ó¼ÒËùÊìϤµÄ׬ǮÍøÕ¾½ö½öÄÜÃÖ²¹ÄúµÄÉÏÍø·ÑÓ㬶øÎÒÃǽéÉܵÄÕâÒ»ÍøÕ¾ÊÇʹ²Æ¸»Æ½Ãñ»¯µÄ ׬ǮÍøÕ¾£¬Ë

Re: Re: [SAtalk] BSD rc.d script and HTML spam

| > | pid=`pidof spamd` ? > > 'pidof' is a Debian thing. > [jason@traveller jason]$ cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma) [jason@traveller jason]$ pidof init 1 -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Sy

[SAtalk] memory utilization in SA 2.1

ftlimit -a 1000 /usr/bin/spamd -F 1 -L -x \ -u spamc > /var/log/spamd.log 2>&1 -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] memory utilization in SA 2.1

-L -x \ > > -u spamc > /var/log/spamd.log 2>&1 As you can see - no "-a" option. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing l

Re: [SAtalk] memory utilization in SA 2.1

g: is spam? score=2.9 required=5 server started on port 783 server pid: 28119 logmsg: server started on port 783 -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-ta

RE: [SAtalk] CommuniGate is also RATWARE

in some spam filters as spam software just because it is not very common, so the name tends to stick out when examining headers. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/ __

[SAtalk] More falsies with SA in an M$ Exchange network

xchange Site Connector message header EXCHANGE_SITE_CONNECTOR From =~ /\/cn=Configuration\/cn=Servers\// I can't say I've ever seen spam from that type of address, so could we add that as a permanent rule? Thanks -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Naviga

[SAtalk] Spamassassin on Postfix Relay

Howdy, I want to use Spamassassin on our Postfix bastion mail host to filter all mail before it's relayed to our MAILSweeper (which then forwards to Exchange). I've had a quick look at the Spamassassin Pages and checked Deja but I can't find any good reference to anyone who's doing this.

[SAtalk] make test fails

st.pm line 116 Not found: subj = Subject: Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelisting t/dir_based_whitelist.NOK 12Not found: subj = Subject: 4000 Your Vacation Winning ! t/dir_based_whitelist.FAILED tests 1-12, 14-15 Failed 14/15 tests, 6.67% okay Jason -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[SAtalk] General comments on Spamassassin, with a few questions

data base of spam messages which Spamassassin has failed to detect? This would be a good resource for the developers when updating the rule sets. I would certainly be willing to forward undetected spam to an appropriate collection address if this would assist the development effort. Regar

Re: [SAtalk] More falsies with SA in an M$ Exchange network

;s problem as to when SA should be invoked and when it shouldn't be. However, the whole issue of false-positives on known to be locally generated mail can really only be dealt with by the MTA (Qmail-Scanner in this case), so I am looking at that now as the real solution. -- Cheers Jason

Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right)

y filtering spam. www.orbz.org has details of what happened, including the fact that the city government that originally threatened them now agrees that the problem is a buggy mail server and has apologized. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right)

lity... (i.e. "what? You need to run a SMTP client??, that makes you a business customer... cha-CHING!) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 ___ Spamassassin-talk maili

Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ reborn as DSBL [Was: Freedom of Press / Speech /Junk Mail (yah right)]

it open relays to send these specially formatted messages to add the relays to the list. Bascically what happened is they discovered that probing open relays is dangerous and can get you in trouble, so they stopped doing that, now they want everyone else to do it for them, which takes t

Re: [SAtalk] Freedom of Press / Speech / Junk Mail (yah right)

g that tag in the subject is an clear pointer that my filter > wasn't right. > I use it, and personally I prefer the very short 'SPAM', to the very long and unweildy 'POSSIBLE UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL EMAIL', which I suspect is so long that non

Re: [SAtalk] Don't send attachments to SpamAssasin sightings mailing list

Matthew Cline writes: > Looking through the archives, anything that's been sent with an attachment > ends up not having anything; either SourceForge or GeoCrawler is stripping > them. My mailer sends forwarded messages as RFC 822 attachments. Are they making it? I typically send from my [EMAI

Re: [SAtalk] performing all tests

, you should probably make sure that negative scoring tests come first. -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/ ___ Spamassassin-tal

Re: [SAtalk] reporting, filtering options

e next release of Qmail-Scanner (which includes SpamAssassin support) will only run SA over mail when RELAYCLIENT is unset - i.e. the mail wasn't locally generated. That remove 90% of the false positives SA was generating due to poorly written local M$ mail programs... -- Cheers Jason Haar

Re: [SAtalk] Porn mail deleting for school

their network, and in cases where a company does not have a policy, most states have held that they have that right because it's their network (IANAL, check http://law.freeadvice.com/intellectual_property/computer_law/email_privacy.htm) -- Jason Kohles

[SAtalk] Should spamd use gethostbyaddr?

t a nameserver, then there's going to be (could be) all these extra DNS lookups going on just to resolve 127.0.0.1... Just a thought. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417

Re: [SAtalk] Why am I getting this?

t these are the kinds of error messages you would get when trying to run a perl script with a shell interpreter, check and make sure you have a correct #! line in the script, or change procmail to use '/usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/SpamAssassin/spamassassin' instead of just calling spama

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Debug Output

> > SQL Error: ERROR: Missing '=' after 'spamassassin:localhost' in conninfo > This format doesn't work with postgres, you need to use: DBI:Pg:dbname=spamassassin;host=localhost perldoc DBD::Pg for other options. -- Jason Kohles

Re: [SAtalk] Why no `.bat .exe .com .pif' rule?

ld be fairly easy to integrate, but I don't know how good it is... -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/ ___ Spamassassin-

Re: [SAtalk] Why no `.bat .exe .com .pif' rule?

ang. http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/ It already has integration with SpamAssassin, File::Scan, and several other scanners. ...and if you know perl, you can get it's filter to do just about anything. Jason ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PR

[SAtalk] newbie question - getting an error trying to use this withProcmail

I'm following the instructions in the README, but when I send a message to myself (from another account), it bounces back with this message: - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question - getting an error trying to use this with Procmail

Just out of curiosity, what does the IFS= part do, and how necessary is it here? By the way thanks for the info, Im reading up on smrsh now... At 07:50 PM 5/2/2002 -0500, dman wrote: >On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 05:13:03PM -0700, Jason Hough wrote: >| I'm following the instructions in

Re: [SAtalk] newbie question - getting an error trying to use this with

p exactly as the README says: > > "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #jason" > >Hi Jason. > >What system are you running? I just installed SA myself and I didn't need a >.forward file since RH's sendmail is setup to run from a .

Re: [SAtalk] Question about SA and QMail-Scanner..

then echo "Something like the SpamAssassin spamc is present, but not working - ignoring..." SPAMC_BINARY='' ... So it ran "spamc < ./contrib/spamc-nice.eml" (which is not spam) and the output from spamc didn't contain 'X-Spam-Status: No&#

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Thinking of performance

;d suggest the opposite is better: have the real MTA relay it to spamproxyd. If you do it your way, you've just lost all anti-relaying protection... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377

Re: [SAtalk] two newbie questions

ged only in the headers (preferably with the >analysis included somehow as, say, X-SPAM: headers) instead of having >the report and analysis in the body? I don't want to muck with the >body, even if it is nasty ol' spam. > Yes, set 'report_header 1' to move the rep

RE: [SAtalk] shirts?

. Tiny rubber ninjas: http://www.gumballmall.com/cgi-bin/miva?Merchant2/merchant.mv+Screen=PROD&Store_Code=GUMBALLMALL&Product_Code=ninja+fighters+-+toy&Category_Code=toys+1.1%22 -- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Pr

[SAtalk] configuring default SA behavior

Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to make SpamAssassin pay any attention to default configuration settings. I'm using spamassassin from an RPM (spamassassin-2.20-1), and have tried adding config options into /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, into /etc/spamassassin/use

Re: [SAtalk] configuring default SA behavior

On May 22, 2002 11:46 am, Jason Baker wrote: > Perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but I can't seem to make > SpamAssassin pay any attention to default configuration settings. > > I'm using spamassassin from an RPM (spamassassin-2.20-1), and have tried > a

[SAtalk] A pointer for nailing Korean based spam

don't read/speak Korean, so I have no idea what exactly it is, but the characters are: 광고 (hope that comes through) It may be a good basis for a very focused spam rule. I've seen it inside both () and [], but always at the front

[SAtalk] WEB_BUGS tests a negative?

spam. -- Jason Rimmer jrimmer_at_irth.net ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _

Re: [SAtalk] Effect of -L flag

e back about that not being a good idea until the positive checks were done before the negative. Has that happened? If so, would that actually save any time as the entire message would have to be checked for positive tags anyway? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigat

Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed change of SA

On May 30, 2002 09:34 am, dman wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > | I stopped /dev/null:ing e-mails a day or so ago, just to check if there > | are any false hits there (partly due to spam passing SA and going to my > | inbox). > | > | Today when I sent

[SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the footer. The footer was worth having to read it though. :) > If you could't understand this language, please click the rejection button. > [rejection] > Because of operation error, this e-mail may be delivered. > Please click the r

Re: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter

On May 31, 2002 06:31 pm, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Jason Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This one got by with a 4.8/5... mostly in Korean, except for the > > footer. The footer was worth having to read it though. :) > > The language guessing code (now in CVS) mig

[SAtalk] Documentation for procmail / spamassassin gateway?

ail -m $h $g $u -- I'm a bit new to Sendmail. The admin was laid off, and now suddenly I'm it. -Jason ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las V

Re: [SAtalk] spamc message size limits

runs qmail-scanner, and it could just directly access the file on disk. ..Still need the network support though - I for one actually use it to allow a REALLY old Redhat 5.0 mail server to run SA via a spamd on a newer server :-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation

Re: [SAtalk] Cyrillic encoding raises the spam level to 3.8

o be more obviously configurable? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ___ Don'

[SAtalk] Spamassassin and blacklisting

ched any light on this? Many Thanks Jason Crummack Easysoft Limited --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an

[SAtalk] FW: Low Cost Traffic

This scored very low 3.8 any idea why? --- Begin Message --- Hi Dear friend, I send you this email Because I find you sign some traffic exchange program . Maybe you will be interested in some low cost popup traffic .Yep , it's low cost and real traffic. ADVERTISERS !! 1000 Unique PopUp only 1

[SAtalk] spamd & user_prefs

spamd which is running as the user 'filter'. Is there some sort of special permissions that spamc/spamd need to read the user_prefs file in ~/.spamassassin? I tried running spamd as root and it didn't seem to matter. Thanks, Jason ---

Re: [SAtalk] spamd & user_prefs

27;m starting spamd with: usr/bin/spamd -a -d -m 10 -r /var/run/spamd.pid & and in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have: allow_user_rules 1 Does all of this seem to make sense? My ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs only has one command which is 'required_hits 3.5'. Thanks for the he

[SAtalk] LOW score 0.6 why????

Just had this one come through for domains. Really low score. Should I add a new rule?? Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hotbox.ru ([211.219.2.60]) by mta014.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: [SAtalk] spamassassin and windows

Just got done setting up pop3proxy with spamassassin and it works great. I use it for checking my home email. Setup was relatively easy. You need: Pop3proxy activePerl And spamassassin tar ball -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, Septembe

[SAtalk] Need to change 'required hits' but no local.cf file

n/user_prefs is out of the question. I have some spamassassin directories here: /usr/local/share/spamassassin /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin but not here: /etc/spamassassin /usr/share/spamassassin Any help would be greatly apprecia

[SAtalk] Question on installing SA and using spamd

ere I want them, and then run spamd in the background (using the -d flag?). Finally, configure postfix to call for spamc instead of spamassassin, correct? Just want to make sure I have all my bases covered. Thanks for all the help. Jason ---

[SAtalk] Problems getting spamd working with postfix

cant figure out for the life of me on how to fix that error. Does anyone have any suggestions? Im getting more and more confused here. :/ Jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.

[SAtalk] Trouble getting spamd working with postfix

suggestions or can help me out to correct my problem? I do appreciate it. Cheers, Jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassi

RE: [SAtalk] Trouble getting spamd working with postfix

rint $socket "QUIT\n"; close($socket); exit(0); Now, this could be completely off and not necessary. My main goal is to have incoming mail passed to SA for reviewing and tagged as it should be. Maybe I dont need a second script? I dunno. Im just guessing at this point. I appreciate every

  1   2   3   >