On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 15:58, dman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:08:43AM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote: > | > | Some of the spam I get is -not- *commercial* mail. Just random weird bulk > | spam nonsense. And "UNSOLICITED MAIL" is shorter. :-) > | > | I'm curious if most SA users are using Subject: rewriting or not. > > I kinda use it. I mean, it's turned on, but I only see that subject > when I view the spam folder. I had turned it off at one point, but > then I think I messed up my filters and thought SA was misbehaving. > Seeing that tag in the subject is an clear pointer that my filter > wasn't right. > I use it, and personally I prefer the very short 'SPAM', to the very long and unweildy 'POSSIBLE UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL EMAIL', which I suspect is so long that none of the original subject would be displayed in many mail clients.
-- Jason Kohles [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior System Architect Red Hat Professional Consulting http://www.redhat.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
