On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:18:51AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote: > Looking at the source for spamc, it looks to me like a message that exceeds > the maximum message size is simply skipped entirely, which actually requires > reading in most of the message first - fair enough, as it's hard to > determine the size when it's coming from a pipe. However, wouldn't it make
It would be nice if spamc could read from a file as well as a pipe. In that case spamc could stat the file and figure out it's size in advance. In fact, it would also be nice if spamd could do that same thing. 99% of us are running spamd on the same host as the MTA - so why the overhead of calling the network to pass the contents of a file that is already on the local disk? The Qmail-Scanner SA support would really benefit from this. I'd get spamd to run as the same usercode that runs qmail-scanner, and it could just directly access the file on disk. ..Still need the network support though - I for one actually use it to allow a REALLY old Redhat 5.0 mail server to run SA via a spamd on a newer server :-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 _______________________________________________________________ Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
