[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FYI -- I'm noticing SPAMs which contain ONLY an image are not being
> filtered at all. Specifically, the HTML message only contains simple
> open/close BODY and HTML tags with just the IMG SRC tag in the middle
> - which in turn loads a spam-related promotion from somewhe
Today starts day 1 of a massive joe-job against my
domain.
Today also starts day 1 of my crusade to do something to help
the problem.
I feel that large providers of high speed internet services
(Cable / DSL) need to do more to protect their customers.
If the Cable / DSL providers wer
AltGrendel wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 18:28, Fred wrote:
>>
>> I can not imagine what it would be like to work for an abuse dept. at
>> an internet company and receive hundreds or thousands of complaints
>> about customers computers being hijacked or turned into spam
Keith Dowell wrote:
> I made this point on a mimedefang list. Some people didn't really
> like it.
I like your point but I have some minor points of interest.
>
> Computers are too complicated for people to be responsible some said.
>
> So I tried equating it to maintaining your car in that, if
Are you learning spam as ham? Your bayes_00 would
counter to give a negative score and that's why these messages are slipping
in. If you increase the score on your local test it will most likely catch
these but you most likely have a bad bayes db.
You might want to turn Auto-learning off
Dan Wilder wrote:
> Anybody taken a look at the DNS RBL at
>
> http://cbl.abuseat.org/
>
I've been using this for a few months,
Read this article:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=cbl.abuseat.org+spamcop&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=3f2429ab.3097540281%40loressamy&rnum=3
If you chec
I think this is a bug in the latest release of SA, I just reported it an
hour ago. Theo is checking it out for me, we might see a new version
released soon!
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Charles Gagnon wrote:
> I have messages I am desperatly trying to whitelist fro
Matthew Trent wrote:
> John Wilcock wrote:
> That would also help with the problem of the report exceeding Exim's
header
> size limit when a ton of TW or BH rules hit.
I need to do more testing, here is the early results from my personal
corpus.
It appears with the current score, the rules are les
A bug in 2.6 caused messages which hit BAYES_99 to be learned as ham, this
has been fixed, you should upgrade.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
PieterB wrote:
> Can somebody explain me why a spammessage gets learned as ham?
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, h
The wiki page has rules to handle v1agr.. It also has rules for generic
viagra which really do a good job for us.
http://www.exit0.us
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: "Jess Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin List" <[EMAI
I don't think this made it to the list!
Fred wrote:
> Hello,
> I just wanted to let the group know, 2.6 on Win32 is working great.
> (only 2 small changes needed to get it working.)
> I left directions on the wiki page, www.exit0.us
>
>
> One question, I noticed
Hello,
I just wanted to let the group know, 2.6 on Win32 is working great. (only 2
small changes needed to get it working.)
I left directions on the wiki page, www.exit0.us
One question, I noticed rules for Yahoo redirects YAHOO_REDIR and also
BIZ_TLD in 2.6 but I have an e-mail which is not scor
What version of SA are you using?
I noticed this issue yesterday with RC1 of 2.6, I sent a message to the
list, no response yet.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
culley harrelson wrote:
> I just put these in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and spamassassin
> doesn't seem
Has anyone inquired about the troubles of this list? Is it normal to see
your messages the day after you post them? Is it normal to see messages
appear out of order? Why does it take so long to see your own post?
I've only been on this list for 3 weeks, but the past 3 days have shown a
real slow
DNS lookups require UDP port 53, that is all that is needed for a RTBL
check.
Razor, Pyzor, DCC I have no Idea, they don't work with Win2k.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Sebastian Dietrich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use a firewall to limit internet traffic on my mail-serv
Hello,
I seen the same thing, I was not able to find anything either. It appears
to come from AT&T and Comcast, have you seen it anywhere else?
It only seems to appear in non-RFC messages, so we created a rule to add
points for it.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Larry
Hello,
I use Win2k with Active Perl 5.6.1 and SA 2.55 (I also have test machine
with SA 2.6), using this setup, I am unable to take advantage of DCC, Razor
and Pyzor. I found other programs which I could include as tests for SA on
Win32, but I need help writing the custom eval test.
I have a con
Hello,
I'm using 2.60 rc2.
Proposal: Should --lint check for orphan test scores?
Reasons: When we upgrade and we have custom scores in local.cf or user prefs
this will help us identify which tests are no longer in use.
Other: If we somehow spell a test name wrong in the score statement, it
woul
In order to get around this trick, I added a meta test which checked for the
presence of our IP blocks in the received header, if found, do nothing, if
missing, score enough to over-ride the white-list.
Then play cleanup with those using other connectivity.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Informat
Try upgrading to 2.60, it's much better at parsing these messages. That
spam is using a trick which makes the message body invisible to SA, it's
fixed in 2.60.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Muenz, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I often receive Spam with a link includes
RC3 is working great! I have noticed a huge improvement on my production
server. I'm the same as you are, normally I would not do this in
production, but the benefit from using 2.6 over 2.55 was enough for me to
take the plunge.
I used to receive 1 to 2 FPs a day with SA 2.55 and a 6.6 threshold
I found another nice spammer trick, using a marquee.
This was an image only spam with this huge marquee above the image.
Princess Astrid of Sweden was born on November 17, 1905. She was the
youngest daughter of Prince Charles of Sweden, Duke of Vastergotland, and
Princess Ingeborg of Denmark. A
http://people.freenet.de/ukrebs/dbxconv.html
This will let you convert to the MBOX format needed for SA.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Francis wrote:
> My box is in the format dbx (Outlook Express).
>
> Is it possible?
>
> Francis
>
> - Original Message -
Has anyone on this list installed SA
with cygwin?
I'd like to start using spamc +
spamd and my only
option appears to be cygwin.
Is this safe for production?
Thanks!
Fred
# Domain name starts with number(s)
uri MY_DOMAIN_STARTS_NUMS
/[.\/@]+\d+[a-zA-Z\-]+[a-zA-Z0-9\-]*\.(com|net|biz|info)/i
describe MY_DOMAIN_STARTS_NUMS Domain name starts with numbers
score MY_DOMAIN_STARTS_NUMS0.5
# Domain name ends with number(s)
uri MY_DOMAIN_ENDS_NUMS
/[.\/@]+[a-zA-Z
-spam.txt and produce the expected output with spamc.
Should I file a bugzilla report, do you need more information?
Thanks,
Fred
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Here's a quick rule I just made in response to Verisign's actions.
header __DNS_SITEFINDER eval:check_rbl_from_host('sitefinder', '.')
tflags __DNS_SITEFINDER net
header SITEFINDER_IP eval:check_rbl_sub('sitefinder', '64.94.110.11')
describe SITEFINDER_IP From: resolves to a verisign hijacke
Hello,
I am using ActiveState perl 5.6.1 and SpamAssassin 2.60rc5 on Windows 2000.
I have managed to get SpamD running with only 2 minor code changes.
Only one issue yet to be resolved is this error which appears on startup:
No such signal: SIGHUP at spamd.pl line 434.
In order to get SpamD
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?epi-content=GENERIC&newsId=20030918005730&headlineSearchConfigBO=106393320%201063949537000%20%20groupByDate%20%201%20-4%20106393320%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%201000151%20true%20true%20&newsLang=en&beanID=478837757&viewID=news_view
Sor
Mark London wrote:
> Does spamassassin simply total up the scores of all the tests which
> are found to be valid for a message,
correct
> does spamassassin or another other software use
> this type of reasoning? Just curious, because I often get low spam
> scores for messages which are clearly s
Hello,
Do not assume we know which version of SA you are using. This information
is really helpful.
Do you use Bayes? (is it trained with 200 spam & 200 ham)?
Do you use Auto-White List? (Possible reason for your troubles.)
You can fine tune the scores all you like, if you find a test which you
I think this would be
fullTEST_NAME/regex/
Samuli Kärkkäinen wrote:
> The manual
> (http://au2.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html) doesn't
> make it clear if user defined tests "header", "rawbody" etc. match
> one line at a time or the entire message at once. Experimentat
You'll need to do this in your SMTP
server (if possible).
If it allows, you would need to
modify how your SMTP server calls SA, for each user you would specify the path
to their user prefs file.
-p prefs,
--prefspath=file, --prefs-file=file Set user preferences
file
You would al
This could also be 2.55 issue where messages with multiple MIME parts was
not completly scanned?
For example, the thread about pic.gif where that spammer used some trick
with multiple mime parts
and that caused the message to be invisible. The good news is this is fixed
in 2.60 and that's a final
in your local.cf file add the following:
all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
read to docs!
-
Frederic Tarasevicius
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Fountain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:42 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Silly question about w
No, this virus (like many others) is using a forged From line, the only way
you can tell who is infected is through the IP addresses in the received
header.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Peter Richards wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>> On 2003-10-01 02:36:52 +, Peter Rich
I once came up with a partial solution to this problem.
I used a bunch of dictionaries to find letter pairs that did not show up.
Granted it's possible for these to cause FP's due to uncommon abbrevations
and other oddities, but they work good for me!
Maybe if the regex was modified to check if th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:15:50 -0500, Fred I-IS.COM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> posted to gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general:
>
> Try adding an /s:
>
> fullT_FOO//is
>
> Normally the . in a Perl regular expression cannot match
I received one of these when I replied to a message from this list.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Ken Gordon wrote:
> This looks to me to be a new, creative approach to spamming:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu Oct 30, 2003 6:17:51 PM
Ed wrote:
> A *wonderful* way to phrase that. ^_^
>
> I agree totally. If you can't RTFM, you shouldn't be administering ANY
> system, IMHO.
>
> Ed
I say add this line to the signup page for this list, make sure they agree
to this before joining ;)
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Ser
Hello,
They are literally using * in the headers for to and from.
It could be a response to our bouncing of their Spam.
Thanks for the rule!
Frederic Tarasevicius
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fred I-IS.COM" <[EMAIL P
This is answered once a day, thank you Matt Kettler for posting the answer:
Read the manpage.. this is disabled by default in 2.55 for security
paranoia reasons, at least when you're running spamd it is. If you add
"allow_
Hello,
A few changes were made:
#normally I do not use whitelist_to, I try to use only whitelist_from If a
local user does not want you to filter their e-mail, use
all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]# this would bypass SA for all e-mail coming
FROM @..
body LOCAL
Just a minor correction, Justin once mentioned that the tests page shows the
rules from the latest released version, he changed that some time ago.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Mairhtin O'Feannag Sent: Monday, November
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
This page explains how to add your own RTBLs.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Nigel Featherston wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if SpamAssassin uses the following blacklists:
>
> rhsbl.ahbl.org
I gave this guy a piece of my mind! The guy wasn't smart enough to update
his SA install, he used 2.44 because it came with the RH9 disks he had. No
wonder he had a hard time finding support, that software is outdated!
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com
commercial services", sir Dialup ISPs only receive
10-20 per month from their clients, how are we supposed to afford everything
else when all our money goes to commercial e-mail services which we can do
for free on our own in our spare time?
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Sunday, November
Check the output of "spamassassin -D --lint" to see which path SA is using.
This might help figure out the problem or identify config errors.
P.S. If you don't like the Wiki content, please fix it, I put that on that
site so people like you have *something* to work with. Reason for using
Wiki is
Christopher Kunz wrote:
> BTW: What kind of header is this?
>
> X-Ki:
>
> --ck
That's a fake header name with your e-mail address encoded with base64.
Un-base64 that and you get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I munged most of it for your protection, but having that encoding here is
enough to give your addr
Adam Denenberg wrote:
> SA List,
>
> What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I would like to be
> able to allow people to submit confirmed ham and/or spam to a large
> bayes corpus repository (or maybe just spam) where people could then
> download (or somehow do an sa-learn remotely) to
- Original Message -
From: Billy A. Pumphrey
I know its blocking it there because when I took it down it came through.
SA does not block e-mail, it only identifies mail as ham or spam, something
else in your system must be doing the blocking!
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information
I know this has been discussed before and many people said to use bayes for
this but it'd really be nice to have an "Automatic IP Blacklist" for SA.
AWL takes this too far as spammers just use random e-mail address in the
from.
Bayes takes everything into consideration and does too much for what I
Hello,
I am out the door on my way to work but we need a rule for a new IE exploit
just released,
Visit this page, the exploit is harmless but to the spoofer, it's man's best
friend.
http://www.zapthedingbat.com/security/ex01/vun1.htm
I think this should be put in the next SA release!!
---
Dan Tappin wrote:
> Here is a custom rule for a PayPal spoof virus that is going around.
I missed that one, try this out, they work for all previous scams I've seen.
header __RCVD_PAYPAL Received =~ /paypal\.com/i
header __FROM_PAYPAL From =~ /paypal\.com/i
uri __URI_PAYPAL /paypal\.com/i
head
Tim B wrote:
> Hey I stumbled over this little gem of a marketeer, looks like they
> claim they can bypass any spamfilter. Anyone familiar with this group?
>
> onlinemarketingpros.net
>
That's funny, their website says in business since 1997, but their whois
shows different (10 days ago ;):
rs.
Microsoft announced that Outlook Express 6 is getting a change
in behaviour in the next OS service Pack due out next year. Starting with
SP2, Outlook Express will no longer download external content (by
default). That means a large majority of IMAGE ONLY SPAMS won't work in
Outlook Express
Scott Harris wrote:
> I wanted to stir up some conversation about spam laws, disclosure
> and bulk emails/mailing lists.
>
> I have a user who subscribes to a few mailing lists and they have
> recently started adding the following disclosure to the emails they
> send:
>
> *
Scott Harris wrote:
>
> As a point of clarification, I thought it would be useful for people
> to know the source of this. Most everyone is pointing out that this
> block of text references an old bill that never passed.
>
> This is from the sys-con.com mailing list people. They are emailing
> th
Some of the group members are already working on this, it's not officially
part of SA but it'll be highly referenced to in the coming days..
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Maybe spamassassin needs some parts that can be downl
Kelson Vibber wrote:
> Ebay has an email address for reporting spoofs. They ask that you
> forward them (inline) to [EMAIL PROTECTED], at least in theory so that
> they can investigate the spoofers.
>
> http://www.ebay.com/securitycenter/
> http://pages.ebay.com/education/spooftutorial/
I have
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 11:23 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] X-Originating-IP isn't a number
> I got a spam today where the X-Originating-IP header wasn't a number.
Hotmail
> always puts the dotted
I have ideas on this one, how about ignoring any words between []'s this
would prevent false positives for many group discussions, as for example
this group uses SAtalk and I'm sure this word isn't in your dict. Also
ignore numbers or numbes with chr's between them? I've seen lots of dates
and ot
Chris Santerre wrote:
> WOW!!! Nice work!!
>
> Thanks for sharing the results!! We can put that whole spellcheck
> thing to rest now ;)
>
> --Chris
I won't let this die yet, I have a few ideas to play with, and more when I
get more time to look at some ham subjects which could cause these
results
Teun Vink wrote:
>
> Since the scores for these individual rules are low, I've added them to my
> personal mailserver as well. I'm Dutch, so we'll see what it does to a mix
> of English and Dutch :)
>
>
> Teun
>
That was our plan, keep the scores low, there are so many rules, you are
likely to se
I tried to accomidate for those names while I was generating the regex's. I
remembered the large ones like NWA, AA, and a few others I can't think of
now. But please send me examples so I can fix these rules up!
When I created these, I had 3 letter combos in my brain for weeks, I kept
thinking o
This will be correct in 2.7 when SA starts using their own custom MIME
parser. There are some issues with the current MIME parser, so answer to Q
is a fix is coming soon in the flavor of SA 2.7.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
810-794-4400
mailto:[EM
You can modify the header that Chilkat uses to be that of your own. You
just specify that header like you would any other. Chilkat puts their name
in their for a default, but if you specify one, it will show your own. I
use this component for my web e-mail system and I love it!!
Frederic Tarase
I have SA 2.61 running spamd on a Mandrake server with Postfix. It sends mail
to our Exchange 2000 server on the LAN. All is ok, except for one user that
wants to opt-out. This user wants to get all messages unmodified by SA (I think
header mods would be acceptable as long as subject and body
Thanks, but as I read it the -d will remove SA's markup for that user, but
won't do anything about the main problem, which is the other users being
impacted by this one user's decision to opt-out. Ie: they will ALL continue to
receive spam messages as long as this one user is one of the recip
This is the same setup that I use with a Mandrake mail server and it works
pretty well. We use Exchange on a SBS setup with the POP3 connector, but I'm in
the process of changing that to use SMTP delivery. Documentation for SA could
really be improved; I see the same questions being asked and
igest/SHA1/sha1_hex.al in @INC (@INC contains: lib
../blib/lib /home/fred/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60/blib/lib
/home/fred/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60/blib/arch
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/i686-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/i686-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.
ted address
Sigh...
--
Fred Marton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universitaet Bayreuth
D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
+49(0)921 55-3718, +49(0)921 55-3769 (fax)
http://www.bgi.uni-bayreuth.de/
"You're looking at me as if this weren't a scientific
explanation.&
note, I've also been seeing a spate of empty spam messages
recently. In addition, we have received a number of messages about a
request for quote on a Differential Warp Generator. Either there's a
serious looney running around, or someone is definitely cleaning their
mailing list. :-)
ce =
"imap://bacon;[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"
debug: tokenize: header tokens for Content-Transfer-Encoding =
"quoted-printable"
debug: tokenize: header tokens for *r = "(qmail 8150 invoked by uid 99);
"
debug: tokenize: header tokens for *r = "(qmail 8150 invoked by uid
9
So many things depend on perl that upgrading it is a non-trivial
task. Since I'm replacing the server in a few weeks, I'll wait until
then to attempt a full perl upgrade.
--
Fred Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aerodyne Research, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
in
why it works. Is it taking advantage of a quirk or a feature of html?
href="http://srd.yahoo.com/drst/microword/*http://www.qt323dss.com/ma/";
--
Fred Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aerodyne Research, Inc.
---
This SF.net em
tired, fried one at that, I don't
see what should be tried next. Something to do with that last bit about
version.c and db.h? Not sure what that's telling me. Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Fred Bennett
fbennett_AT_bengal.net
---
This SF
Hello. My first post here, so be gentle ;-)
I got Spamassassin 2.61 installed and it's working. Bayes is enabled, but
when I try to train it or do anything with sa-learn I get something like
this:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Baye
It appears that if a subject contains a period, it will fail
the test for all caps.
Example:
Subject: URGENTASSISTANCENEEDED.
Frederic TaraseviciusInternet Information Services,
Inc.
Hello,
Try this:
header GOREALTIME Subject =~ /GOREALTIME\b/i
I am thinking the problem was the ^ before the text.
I think that means to not match anything following.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: "Danita Zanre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the current online docs:
blacklist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the given address appears as a recipient in the message headers
(Resent-To, To, Cc, obvious envelope receipient, etc,) the mail will be
blacklisted. Same format as blacklist_from.
Appears on page:
http://au.spamassassin.org/
Try running spamassassin -D and it should provide more information when
attempting to do DNS tests.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
810-794-4400
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wow, that was a 5 hour delay from when I sent that message.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
> Try running spamassassin -D and it should provide more information
> when attempting to do DNS tests.
>
> Frederic Tarasevicius
> Inter
Can anyone provide a policy for an ISPs' use of Spam
Assassin to filter customers e-mail?
We need to update our policy to explain about SA and our use of it.
I'd like to see how other companies are doing it, how they protect
themselves etc.
Thanks for your time,
Frederic TaraseviciusIn
I seen this too, but make sure you run --lint on your config file to ensure
it's good!
See also:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/Win32Install26
It does not appear that all tests are working on my install of 2.6, --lint
returns as normal but
as in my other post, I am seeing misses where I know there
Is it possible to use the dsn listing from
RFC-ignorant.org?
This RTBL is meant to check the From line of the e-mail, to
check if the sender is RFC ignorant.
Are these types of DNSBL tests possible with
SpamAssassin?
zone = dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
From their website:
How to Use Domain-Bas
ESTNAME $SOMESCORE
>
> That should be four lines in total (MUA wrapped it I think). The
> variables starting with $ should be edited for whatever zone you want
> to use.
>
>
>
> Ryan Moore
> --
> Perigee.net Corporation
> 704-849-8355 (sales)
> 704-849-
Hello,
I found a new set of listwashing tokens, all are located inside HTML
comments.
I created the following transform matrix:
Left side is what the letter should be, the right side is the transformed
text.
An example looks like:
Message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would look like:
a=d
b=O
c=,
d
Hi all, I just received this spam, It made me laugh so I
thought to pass it on.
Welcome to the site it's us again, now we extended our offerings,
here is a list: 1. Heroin, in liquid and crystal form. 2.
Rocket fuel and Tomohawk rockets (serious enquiries only). 3. Other
rockets (Air
The ending,
pIz
It's a cap I, and the /i at the end tells it to ignore case.
I think you want a number 1 in there?
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Robin Witkop-Staub wrote:
> I was trying the following filter found on the suggested script
> sharing page. For some re
Hello,
Just a FYI the domain name is also mis-spelled, it says:
spamasassin.org
where the proper name is:
spamassassin.org
They are missing an S in the first ASS.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
810-794-4400
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chuck Peters w
Hello,
I seen a post a few days back which explained that you could
use -D with an extra parameter to specify the debug the RTBL tests.
Can someone re-post this information, I find the docs for 2.55
to be lacking this information.
Thank you,
Frederic TaraseviciusInternet Information Servic
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/Win32Install26
Which SMTP server are you using and what type of interface you have to scan
mail is the hardest part.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Will the program run on MS windows NT and/or 2000 servers? I
SA Reads all .cf files located in that directory.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> Martin Radford schrieb:
> [...]
>>> 4) I am new to spamassassin. What parameter should I use in my
>>> configuration to cause spamassassin to stop using osirus
I've recently integrated a third-party program into SpamAssassin. I found
the best way to do this (in my case) was to create a program to run the 3rd
party app, take the results and add them into a X-Header and append to the
message. Using SA it's simple to create a rule based on X-headers. This
http://www.collegian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/09/08/3f5beeca27bed
Here's a news article of SA in use at a college. Too bad
the news article was calling it: Spam Assassination
I contacted them to make corrections :)
Frederic TaraseviciusInternet Information Services, Inc.
See this page:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Frank Pineau wrote:
> Is there any way to make SA check other RBL's? Ever since the demise
> of Osirusoft, I've been using my own RBL zone file on my DNS server,
> but I'd like to
That is correct information, but I too am still seeing a few from one server
which has it's date set to March 20th 2003. I wrote a rule to catch mail
from that server and I haven't seen anymore since!
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Steve Thomas wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13
Hello,
Anyone ever hear of "No Spam Today" mail filtering
software? It boasts that it uses "SpamAssassin" technology.
http://www.no-spam-today.com
Is it a scam, they are charging money for it!
Quoted from their page:
No Spam Today! uses award winning SpamAssassin™ technology
to identify and
e projects right?
>
> Andreas
>
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
>
>> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:45:46 -0400
>> From: Fred I-IS.COM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Spamassassin-Talk \\(E-mail\\)"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
