|
Are you learning spam as ham? Your bayes_00 would
counter to give a negative score and that's why these messages are slipping
in. If you increase the score on your local test it will most likely catch
these but you most likely have a bad bayes db.
You might want to turn Auto-learning off and manually train
all spam and ham.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 10:43
AM
Subject: [SAtalk] too much spam...
Greetings
Using SA Ver. 2.63 with Mimedefang, and
still quite a bit of spam is getting through. Have all the current
BigEvil, ect... As an example, a rule is in place in
local.cf
header SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST Subject:raw
=~ /=\?.*\?=/i
describe SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST Subject begins with
=?
score SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST 5.0
When a
message comes in:
Subject:
=?ISO-8859-1?b?V2UgaGF2ZSB3aGF0IHlvdSBuZWVkIC0gQ2hlYXBlc3QgcHJlc2NyaXB0aW8vbnMgb24gdGhlIGludGVybmV0?=
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0CAC_A6ABA171.138272BD"
X-Spam-Score: 3.422
BAYES_00,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,RM_rb_ANCHOR,RM_rb_BODY,RM_rb_HTML,SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST
X-Scanned-By:
MIMEDefang 2.30 (www . roaringpenguin . com /
mimedefang)
???
thanks...
Paul
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open
Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity.
February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
|
