Scott Harris wrote: > > As a point of clarification, I thought it would be useful for people > to know the source of this. Most everyone is pointing out that this > block of text references an old bill that never passed. > > This is from the sys-con.com mailing list people. They are emailing > the Java Developers journal, Web Services Journal, Java Buyers Guide, > and I think a few others. >
I would take this up with them, it's the first time I've seen a legit mailer trying to (through meaningless words) justify why you should receive their e-mail. That's all that text does is try to say it's ok to spam you. Two Points here: 1: If someone clicked a checkbox to receive e-mail promotions, then it's not spam and you shouldn't have to defend the mailing (using that fake law). 2: If it's not a legit opt-in then they are trying to protect themselves with an old anti-spam law that never passed. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
