Hello Rocky,
Wednesday, January 14, 2004, 8:53:25 PM, you wrote:
RO> I'm writing some custom rules and i am wondering if there is a list
RO> somewhere of what parts of the header i can test? such as
RO> header NO_REAL_NAME From =~
RO> header TO_HAS_SPACESTo:addr =~
First
I'm writing some custom rules and i am wondering if there is a list
somewhere of what parts of the header i can test? such as
header NO_REAL_NAME From =~
header TO_HAS_SPACESTo:addr =~
^
I have just installed v2.55. I have been getting non stop message like
the one attached. I have tried to creat a rule but cannot seem to stop
this from coming in. I just recently added score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE
10.10 to my 50_score.cf file and still no luck.
Any suggestions would be great.
I'm a bit confused. I've installed SA 2.55 last week and everything seemed to
work as planned. I'm running it via procmail using the example shipped. The
problem I'm having is that there is no tagging ( 'X-Spam' ) in the header on
the actuall spam I'm recieving, but the 'real' mail get tagged.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Orbital,
Friday, August 22, 2003, 1:32:12 PM, you wrote:
OO> Hello,
OO> I am new to SA and would like to know if catching 160 spam from 8000
OO> mails in a day is normal or not? I suspect this is not normal so any
OO> ideas where i should look
Hello,
I am new to SA and would like to know if catching
160 spam from 8000 mails in a day is normal or not? I suspect this is not normal
so any ideas where i should look to tighten things up? I am using SA in
conjunction with Mailscanner
Thanks
Darren--
This message has been scanned for
Hello,
I am new to SA and would like to know if catching 160 spam from 8000 mails
in a day is normal or not? I suspect this is not normal so any ideas where i
should look to tighten things up? I am using SA in conjunction with
Mailscanner
Thanks
Darren
--
This message has been scanned for viru
ah, great info, much thanks
the goal would be to be able to "call" custom SA rules per domain
abc.com --> /etc/mail/spamassassin/abc.local.cf
xyz.com --> /etc/mail/spamassassin/xyz.local.cf
and such
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 09:27, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 01:01 PM 8/8/03 +, william f guyt
At 01:01 PM 8/8/03 +, william f guyton jr wrote:
Is their a configuration that allows SA to use unique local.cf for
each domain passing thru a SA gateway?
This is really a function of the tool that calls SA, and not SA itself. So
you'd have to specify which tool you're using for that.
As an
Is their a configuration that allows SA to use unique local.cf for
each domain passing thru a SA gateway?
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Hi all,
I'am a little bit in trouble with installing
SpamAssassin and spampd. I've successfully installed all necessarry modules
on a SuSE Linux 8.0 machine. But after processing one single eMail spampd
seems to be blocked (won't process following eMails without a restart).
Is this a issue coming
Hi
> I'm using QMail and yesterday I compiled the latest version of
> SpamAssassin ! How can I configure it to block spam ??
> I have no idea at all !
>
> P.S: do you know a god virus scanner for qmail ??
I would recommend using qmail-scanner and the clam antivirus software,
I've had no problem
Hi!
I' new to SpamAssassin...
I'm using QMail and yesterday I compiled the latest
version of SpamAssassin !
How can I configure it to block spam
??
I have no idea at all !
P.S: do you know a god virus scanner for qmail
??
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:44:06PM -0600, RTS wrote:
> On a generic site wide configuration when SA identifies a piece of
> mail based on required_hits as spam what does it do with it??
The same thing it does when not on a side-wide basis; it marks up the
mail and passes it back. ie:
Anyway...
On a generic site wide configuration when SA identifies a piece of mail
based on required_hits as spam what does it do with it??
Thanks
RTS
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
Get the perfect geek gi
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a Red hat 7.3 mail server and I am looking for a way to filter
> out SPAM email from our server. We have about 30 email accounts. Can
> SpamAssassin do this?
Yes.
--
Daniel Quinlan Linux, open source, and
http://www.pathname.com/~q
We have a Red hat 7.3 mail server and I am looking for a way to filter out
SPAM email from our server. We have about 30 email accounts. Can Spam
Assassin do this?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://t
quick question please.
now in the header I get a SA score:
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by projects by uid 506 with
qmail-scanner-1.14 (spamassassin: 2.42. Clear:SA:1(8.4/5.0):. Processed
in 0.549996 secs); 16 Oct 2002 17:16:19 -
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.0
but with
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 03:16:14PM -0500, william f guyton jr wrote:
> this is what I have got:
>
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 291 Oct 15 14:20 local.cf
>
> [root@projects spamassassin]# pwd
>
> /etc/mail/spamassassin
Ok, how about /usr/share/spamassassin which is the default for t
this is what I have got:
-rw-r--r--1 root root 291 Oct 15 14:20 local.cf
[root@projects spamassassin]# pwd
/etc/mail/spamassassin
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 14:55, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 02:46:38PM -0500, william f guyton jr wrote:
> > I must have a switch
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 02:46:38PM -0500, william f guyton jr wrote:
> I must have a switch set wrong, but I cant seem to find it.
That is a usual symptom of spamassassin not being able to read the
rule files. Check paths and permissions. Were the rules installed in
a default location?
--
Ra
I am running qmail, patched with qmail-scanner and SA 1.42, everything
tests out fine, but when run a test message thru the MTA running SA, I
dont get any score reported.
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by projects by uid 506 with
qmail-scanner-1.14 (spamassassin: 2.42. Clear:SA:0(0/0):. Proce
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:07:30AM -0400, Don Stafford wrote:
> Do I have to do anything other than install, and then run the spamassassin
> 'start' routine in etc/rc.d/init.d that actually starts spamd?
Do you call spamc from somewhere (procmail, a milter/qmail-scanner/etc)?
--
Randomly Genera
OK - I spoke too soon
Apparently SA is not working
Do I have to do anything other than install, and then run the spamassassin
'start' routine in etc/rc.d/init.d that actually starts spamd?
spamd is running
Don Stafford,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:17:55AM -0400, Don Stafford wrote:
> However, I cannot find a 'log' file to see what is being dumped.
>
> Is there one? How do I know if valid emails are being dumped?
Well, spamassassin doesn't "dump" any emails, it's just a filter. So the
only log you can see is, by
I just setup SA on a RH 7.3 box.
I copied the redhat startup script in /etc/rc.d/init.d and ran it with the
start option.
SPAMD is running... and is apparently working as our incoming spam overnight
was cut tremendously.
However, I cannot find a 'log' file to see what is being dumped.
Is there
>I already have RBL enabled in my MTA (postfix), and those RBL checks
>don't take anywhere near 30 seconds. Altho I will try setting
>"skip_rbl_checks" to 1 and try the timing again.
Be careful;l that RBL test of SA are not the same as RBL tests of your
MTA. SA does not test on the enveloppe, but
>Something must be wrong with your installation or setup.
>My average time for a scan is ~4 seconds and that's with
>RBL's checks and Razor.
That is forgetting a lot of versatility in network access.
I beleive I access most of the RBL servers through 2 satellite hops,
thats means 1 second RTT. A
Tony Hoyle said:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael Leone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: 18 July 2002 16:15
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] newbie question about rule base
>>
>>
>> Hmmm. Well, I can try it again.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Leone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 July 2002 16:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] newbie question about rule base
>
>
> Hmmm. Well, I can try it again. What info should I post, to determine
> wheth
Lars Hansson said:
> On Wednesday 17 July 2002 20:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It *is* faster than spamd, tho - when I was using spamc/spamd, it
>> would take 30+ seconds to scan; amavisd-new does it in like 3 or 4.
>
> Something must be wrong with your installation or setup.
> My average time
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 20:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It *is* faster than spamd, tho - when I was using spamc/spamd, it would
> take 30+ seconds to scan; amavisd-new does it in like 3 or 4.
Something must be wrong with your installation or setup.
My average time for a scan is ~4 seconds and
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 23:28, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> >It *is* faster than spamd, tho - when I was using spamc/spamd, it would
> >take 30+ seconds to scan; amavisd-new does it in like 3 or 4.
>
> It should be, AFAIR, it disable RBL check that takes some time (if nop
> CPU resources).
I already ha
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> >It *is* faster than spamd, tho - when I was using spamc/spamd, it would
> >take 30+ seconds to scan; amavisd-new does it in like 3 or 4.
>
> It should be, AFAIR, it disable RBL check that takes some time (if nop
> CPU resources).
I'm finding the delay
>It *is* faster than spamd, tho - when I was using spamc/spamd, it would
>take 30+ seconds to scan; amavisd-new does it in like 3 or 4.
It should be, AFAIR, it disable RBL check that takes some time (if nop
CPU resources).
Olivier
---
This sf
The rules are static, and hand made. The "AI" part is done by the
developers to evolve the scores applied to rules, and is done prior to release.
/usr/share/spamassassin is the default location for the standard ruleset.
You can add your own custom rules in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf for
s
> I'm considering whether to incoporate spamassassin
> into our main mailgateway (which is running amavis as email virus
> scan. The good thing is the new amavis has this spamassassin
> inclusion option) or not.
Well, amavisd-new has it. There are like 4 versions of amavis now -
amavis, amavisd,
I'm considering whether to incoporate spamassassin
into our main mailgateway (which is running amavis as email virus
scan. The good thing is the new amavis has this spamassassin
inclusion option) or not. My main concern is how difficult it is
to configure its so called "rule base" which i think i
At 07/12/2002 15:12, Collins, Elizabeth wrote:
>Howdy,
>
> I am new to SpamAssassin but I recently inherited the company wide spam
>filtering stuff. I have been expirimenting w/ my own rules. I like to
>leave the stock rules files as they are, but I want to change some of the
>rules therein.
Howdy,
I am new to SpamAssassin but I recently inherited the company wide spam
filtering stuff. I have been expirimenting w/ my own rules. I like to
leave the stock rules files as they are, but I want to change some of the
rules therein. I have discovered that if you say: score MYRULE 4.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > I had that happen to me too. I had to manually edit the user's spool file
> > and turn the "rom" into "From" to keep the email clients from gaggingn
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Aaron Falk wrote:
> >
> > > I'm trying to integrate Spamassassin into my
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, William Porquet wrote:
> I had that happen to me too. I had to manually edit the user's spool file
> and turn the "rom" into "From" to keep the email clients from gaggingn
>
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Aaron Falk wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to integrate Spamassassin into my RH7.2 sys
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 6:47 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie question - script for resubmit and add to
|whitelist
|
|
|In your message regarding RE: [SAtalk] Newbie question -
|script for resubmit
|and add to whitelist dated T
In your message regarding RE: [SAtalk] Newbie question - script for resubmit
and add to whitelist dated Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:57:33 -0500, Smart, Dan said
that ...
>SD- I copy all message headers as a log to a MBOX mailbox using the Procmail
>SD- :0chi: command. The 'c' comma
Hi
I have only started to use Spamassassin in the the last few days and am
considerably impressed even though I have had several false positives and only
one slip through.
I performed the install as per the defaults
Running spamd with individual procmailrc as per the example ie spam gets sent
t
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:12:46PM -0700, Aaron Falk wrote:
> Actually, I use sendmail so I have no exim.conf. :(
I'm not familar with sendmail, but I'm sure there's something similar.
>
> Through some private correspondance I've been led to believe that there is
> a bug in procmail (even the
>> > > Fetchmail can't get the messages from the IMAP server because now it
>> > > see's a corrupt mailbox. The messages look like this:
>> > >
>> > > rom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 7 00:12:27 2002
>> >
>
> Did you check the FAQ at http://www.spamassassin.org/faq.html ?
>
yep.
>
>
> I wa
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 08:03:44AM -0700, Aaron Falk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:22:47AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Aaron Falk wrote:
> >
> > > Fetchmail can't get the messages from the IMAP server because now it
> > > see's a corrupt mailbox. The messages look li
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:22:47AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Aaron Falk wrote:
>
> > Fetchmail can't get the messages from the IMAP server because now it
> > see's a corrupt mailbox. The messages look like this:
> >
> > rom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 7 00:12:27 2002
>
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Aaron Falk wrote:
> Fetchmail can't get the messages from the IMAP server because now it
> see's a corrupt mailbox. The messages look like this:
>
> rom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 7 00:12:27 2002
Get ftp://ftp.procmail.net/pub/procmail/testing/snapshot.tar.gz and
install
Hi-
I'm trying to integrate Spamassassin into my RH7.2 system and am
having some trouble. I'm using fetchmail to bring mail from a shared
IMAP server to my local machine. I've used the entry from the SA FAQ
on how to use procmailrc and I'm finding the the leading 'F' from each
mail header is di
9 1212 512 364 310
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nipper, Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] newbie &
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:03:22PM +0200, Nipper, Arnold wrote:
> dig just times out if no nameserver is given in resolv.conf
Not surprising. No nameserver means no configuration, so what is dig
supposed to do?
But you had a nameserver line in there, and could check for MX using
dig, corre
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:06:21AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> > It does not trigger NO_MX_FOR_FROM for me. Maybe there was some
transient DNS
> > issue?
>
> He was saying that it's triggered on every email even though the from
> has a valid MX found via some DNS tool
t"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] newbie & question on NO_MX_FOR_FROM
>
>
> > > My first thought was to ask what was in his /etc/resolv.conf, but he
> > > said he's running bind 9-something on that machine.
Hi Henry - I have it working now. I'm using a Cobalt Qube 3 (which runs
some Linux variant, RH I believe).
Just needed to setup procmail correctly, and fix up some stuff in smrsh.
It's working great now!
At 02:55 AM 5/3/2002 -0700, Henry Kwan wrote:
> > My .foward is setup exactly as the READM
> My .foward is setup exactly as the README says:
> "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #jason"
Hi Jason.
What system are you running? I just installed SA myself and I didn't need a
.forward file since RH's sendmail is setup to run from a .procmailrc file
directly. So I just s
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 06:03:47PM -0700, Jason Hough wrote:
| Just out of curiosity, what does the IFS= part do, and how necessary is it
| here?
man bash
It is the Internal Field Separator list. All characters in that
string are considered delimiters for the individual parts of a string
(used
Just out of curiosity, what does the IFS= part do, and how necessary is it
here?
By the way thanks for the info, Im reading up on smrsh now...
At 07:50 PM 5/2/2002 -0500, dman wrote:
>On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 05:13:03PM -0700, Jason Hough wrote:
>| I'm following the instructions in the README, b
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 05:13:03PM -0700, Jason Hough wrote:
| I'm following the instructions in the README, but when I send a message to
| myself (from another account), it bounces back with this message:
|
|- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
| "|IFS=' ' && exec
I'm following the instructions in the README, but when I send a message to
myself (from another account), it bounces back with this message:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
"|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #jason"
(reason: service unavail
> :0fw
> | /usr/local/bin/spamc
A few others have had the same problem. There are a few workarounds. One
of them is to just the following recipe:
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin -P
Aly S.P Dharshi had the following suggestion:
> For some odd reason I had spamc not working and I finally track
I wonder can anyone help me in getting spamassassin to work?
I have followed all the available installation instructions installing Perl
modules etc. and run the tests which seem to work OK. I am running the spamd
daemon as 'root' and have the following lines in my personal .procmailrc
file:
:0f
Hi Folks,
I have just recently started
using the package SA, in conjunction with Exim using the following directives in
Exim from the list (Exim users will see its Nigel's and Dman's
stuff):
Transport:
spamcheck: driver = pipe
command = /usr/local/exim/bin/exim -oMr spam-scanned
On Tuesday 19 March 2002 02:54 pm, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:22:22PM -0800, Byrne Reese wrote:
> | Hopefully, someone can tell me to go read a specific FAQ or something,
> | but I have nothing that will help me get qmail to work with spam
> | assassin.
> |
> | I need spamassassin to
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] newbie question
>
>
> I am trying to get SA to recognize a different mailspool. I thought I
> would do that using the MAIL environment variable.
>
> So my
If so I have scripts for both of those.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rick
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Byrne Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6
Message -
From: "Byrne Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] newbie question
I should clarify. I DON'T want it delivered to /var/spool... sor
I should clarify. I DON'T want it delivered to /var/spool... sorry - a
typo on my part.
There are no clear instructions on what files I need to edit to get it
to work as a filter.
Let me elaborate... my .qmail file once contained only the following:
> ./Maildir/
Indicating that mail for me was
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:22:22PM -0800, Byrne Reese wrote:
| Hopefully, someone can tell me to go read a specific FAQ or something,
| but I have nothing that will help me get qmail to work with spam
| assassin.
|
| I need spamassassin to deliver mail to $HOME/Maildir (in a Maildir
| format, not
Hopefully, someone can tell me to go read a specific FAQ or something,
but I have nothing that will help me get qmail to work with spam
assassin.
I need spamassassin to deliver mail to $HOME/Maildir (in a Maildir
format, not mbox), and deliver it to /var/spool/mail/USER.
What am I missing?
--
I have install spamassassin and have it running sort of.
I use sendmail 8.12.1 with the spamass-milter for a site-wide configuration.
I wrote the init.d script to invoke spamd and one for spamass-milter then I
added the Input_Mail_Filter run into my sendmail.cf file. I'm running into
a problem wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've installed SA 2.1 from CVS. After doing some tests I have it
working ok.
But I'd like to know if there's any way to force SA to use by default
the spanish language files so the report is in that lang.
My setup is sendmail+procmail+spamc/sp
--On Wednesday, February 20, 2002 17:34 -0500 Greg Ward
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have heard good things about
> postfix.
I haven't played much with exim but I've used postfix a lot and it's real
easy to setup.
-jlh
___
Spamassassin-talk m
On 20 February 2002, Mark Graves said:
> I have a RedHat Linux system that I use for DNS, Listserv, etc and was
> wondering if there was a HOWTO document about creating a store-forward
> mail system. That is, have my Linux system (Sendmail) receive all
> inbound SMTP traffic, parse it against Spa
I've tried the anti-spam software that was developed for my WatchGuard Firebox II, and
was very unimpressed. After reading about Spam Assassin, I'm anxious to try it out.
HOWEVER, our mail server is Novell's GroupWise.
I have a RedHat Linux system that I use for DNS, Listserv, etc and was won
76 matches
Mail list logo
