Lars Hansson said: > On Wednesday 17 July 2002 20:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> It *is* faster than spamd, tho - when I was using spamc/spamd, it >> would take 30+ seconds to scan; amavisd-new does it in like 3 or 4. > > Something must be wrong with your installation or setup. > My average time for a scan is ~4 seconds and that's with > RBL's checks and Razor. > Actually, that's the average including virus scanning so the average > spamd check should be even less.
Hmmm. Well, I can try it again. What info should I post, to determine whether I have a problem with my installation or setup? I'm using SA from Debian unstable, so it's v2.31. I can post some mail logs snips, showing the speed once maildrop starts calling spamc. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
