On Wednesday 17 July 2002 20:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It *is* faster than spamd, tho - when I was using spamc/spamd, it would > take 30+ seconds to scan; amavisd-new does it in like 3 or 4.
Something must be wrong with your installation or setup. My average time for a scan is ~4 seconds and that's with RBL's checks and Razor. Actually, that's the average including virus scanning so the average spamd check should be even less. --- Lars Hansson ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
