Just wanted to find out if verson 2.63 inserts lines into message
body of messages it sees as spam. Currently using 2.60 which does do
that.
Or maybe its configurable and I can set it so it doesn't do that.
Confining insertion to headers only?
Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Steve Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> It looks like you're looking for SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS. See if these messages
>>> are triggering that rule. I /dev/null anything that hits on that
"Steve Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like you're looking for SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS. See if these messages
> are triggering that rule. I /dev/null anything that hits on that one.
None of those posted show having hit that rule.
For example: The message with subject:
1O. 14-Oct [ 2
Setup: RedHat 7.3
Spamassassin 2.50
(Running as daemon)
In the many rules that spamassasin parses for each message, are some
of them devoted to identifying a subject line that has too many
non-alphanumic characters? Some kind of percentage deal...
Can someone identify any such rule
I still see no evidence of a message-id being inserted into debug
logs to allow tracking. Or any evidence of time stamping.
This bug was supposed to have been subsumed and corrected by another
one, but these two factors have never appeared in my logs as of cvs
yesterday (2.40).
Maybe I don't un
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...and then Harry Putnam said...
> %
> % I'm a little lost in installing spamassassin without using the
> % ./configure approach. For example: How does one instruct the
> % `make install' to use /usr/local instead of /us
I'm a little lost in installing spamassassin without using the
./configure approach. For example: How does one instruct the
`make install' to use /usr/local instead of /usr?
I don't know much about makefiles but looking at the one in the
distro Makefile.PL and resulting Makefile, I couldn't te
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Am I getting my cvs from the wrong source tree? Just reupped my cvs
>> today and I see the version still says 2.21.
>
> try:
>
> cvs update -A -d
Trying as directed I see no difference
Am I getting my cvs from the wrong source tree?
Just reupped my cvs today and I see the version still says 2.21.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members!
Jab
John Goggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: SpamAssassin (score=9.9, required 7,
> FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS (0.382), CLICK_BELOW (1.531), EXCUSE_7 (1.305), EXCUSE_3
> (1.080), DOUBLE_CAPSWORD (1.050), CLICK_HERE_LINK (0.847), MAILTO_LINK
> (0.782), NO_MX_FOR_FROM (1.8), MSG_ID_ADD
I'm running beta 5.8.0 perl
Getting the latest cvs spamassassin then running
perl Makefile.PL
Gives this curt warning:
reader # perl Makefile.PL
WARNING: PL_FILES takes a hash reference not a string/number.
Please inform the author.
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
W
Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> describe FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD Forged yahoo.com 'Received:' header found
>>
>> Comes no nearer to making it clear what is really happening.
>
> Hrm. This was reported once before, and I thought the description had
> been updated then. Sorry, I should
Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Going to the debug output, how can I find the output that pertains to
>> that message? No date no msgid.
>> I don't see why its being overlooked either. Its not a restart
>> problem though. But can't find debug info to help out.
>>
>
> Fi
Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> This line appears in mail:
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=2.2 required=2.0 tests=Repeat_Any_Allcap,\
>> FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD version=2.20
>>
>> Yet a grep of the re
Can we make Debug output more usefull?
Maybe adding a date prefix and something to crossreference what
message is being read? A msgid would be very handy.
Its kind of useless as it stands unless you are doing only one
message.
An example might be that I see a message where FROM_MALFORMED was
g
This line appears in mail:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=2.2 required=2.0 tests=Repeat_Any_Allcap,\
FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD version=2.20
Yet a grep of the received headers reveal no instance of yahoo.
It is from a yahoo.com user, but the message mentiones rec'd, not
from.
__
"Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm confused. Your message has spamassassin-talk in the To: field. So does
> this one. In my scan through the last 24 hours worth of messages to SAtalk
> and SAdev, 100% of them had the list's address in either the To: or Cc:
> field.
No, I'm confus
Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I see how whitelist_from or to will work, unless the
>> `from' is a reference to the berkely format `From ' (note the
>> missing :)
>>
>
> It works because
Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:51:25PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I'm running spamd like this:
>> spamd -d -D -L -S
>
> Once spamd daemonizes (with the -d option) it's debugging output is
> sent to /dev/null (I
Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I have listed a number of whitelist entries in my user_prefs file.
>>
>> Regardless of an identifying header being listed in the whitelist,
>> spamassassin still marks some mail which should be protected by the
>> whitelist
Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Maybe a little different approach wouldn't require as much huffing
>> and puffing:
>> header Spama X-BeenThere =~ spamassassin-.*@lists
>> score Spama -100
>>
>> So to ge
Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Not sure what's going on though. I just switched to Digest mode. The
> devel group did not have a problem (that I know of, and the digest got
> through).
>
> Here's what's in my user_prefs:
>
> whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> whitelist_to [EMAI
Using body based rules like this one posted here a few days ago:
(It had a different name, which I've lost but the regex is the same)
body Repeat_Any_Allcap /\b([A-Z]{3,})\b.*?\1/
My understaning was that it would notice the repeating of any string
of allcaps containing 3 or more chars, that
John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 23:13, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Your observation got me closely checking my home made rules and
>> edits. I checked by commenting them all then, uncommenting
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It really a two part rule:
> score FW_LOG -100
> header FW_LOG Subject /\[0030AB066D5C\]/
>
> But the last part is what causes the error:
>
> Failed to run header SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax error
&g
John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [...]
>> Failed to run header SpamAssassin tests, skipping some: syntax error
>> at (eval 6) line 11, near ") ~"
>>
>> syntax error at (eval 6) line 19, near ") ~"
>> syntax error at (eval 6) line 568, near ";
>> }"
>> [...]
> [snipped]
>>
>
John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 31-May-2002 at 09:29:47 Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Still experimenting with getting my setup pretty close to a good
>> working config, but suddenly ran into some problems I'm having trouble
>> debugging.
>>
> [...
Setup: OS Redhat Linux
Spamassassin 2.20 Running in spamd/spamc
mode through procmail(sendmail)
Still experimenting with getting my setup pretty close to a good
working config, but suddenly ran into some problems I'm having trouble
debugging.
spamd is started like this:
spamd -d
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> default info for COPY_DVDS:
> body COPY_DVDS /copy.{1,20}dvd/i
> describe COPY_DVDS Containts 'Copy DVDs'
> score COPY_DVDS 2.746
>
>
> I've attempted to
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:55:07AM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> cat /etc/mail/spam/local.cf
>
> do you mean /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
yup
>> I know that /etc/mail/spam/local.cf is being read because of other
>
default info for COPY_DVDS:
body COPY_DVDS /copy.{1,20}dvd/i
describe COPY_DVDS Containts 'Copy DVDs'
score COPY_DVDS 2.746
I've attempted to over ride it with:
cat /etc/mail/spam/local.cf
[...]
score COPY_DVDS 1.8
[...]
But I still see
Starting spamd with these flags:
spamd -d -D -L -S
gives the messages below. The ones I indented look like they are
network type checks of some kind. But the -L flag is supposed to
derail those kind of checks.
Also about the last three lines: What is being scored there?
debug: running bod
Hope some of you find this script usefull.
Its aim is to be fed one of the rule handles and spit out the score,
definition and the rule itself by regex so several may be brought up.
Its just a simple perl regex finding script that trawls thru your *.cf
files for a regex and chops off the lines r
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's the "real" time. IOW how long you sat there waching the screen
> before you saw a response from the program.
>
> Notice that the CPU time used by the system while in "userland"
> differs by 14.66 seconds (a factor of 123) and the CPU time used in
> "syst
"Security" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very interested in running SpamAssassin site-wide on a few of my
> machines. Currently I'm
> Running Postfix for an MTA. Can anyone point me to some good
> documentation on setting up SpamAssassin
> With Postfix? I've done some searches but c
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is normal for the way you're running SA. The way you're using it
> (by running 'spamassassin'), for each message :
> o start a perl process (not cheap)
> o compile lots and lots of regexes (takes lots and lots of CPU)
> o do the regex mat
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The default config file has some examples. Also look at
> /etc/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf (you're using debian, right?).
No, not Debian. In this case RedHat 7.1
About those examples in 60_whitelist.cf:
There are none that show multiple entries in my copy.
[Cross post alert... This should have been posted on `talk'
I had my wires crossed for a few posts which will no be posted to
`talk']
"Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Running some of my spam thru and makine some adjustments, like
>> lowering the required score to 2 (default 5).
[Cross post alert... This should have been posted on `talk'
I had my wires crossed for a few posts which will no be posted to
`talk']
The online docs at:
http://spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
Come within a hairs breadth of giving full details of what will work
with whitelis
[Cross post alert... This should have been posted on `talk'
I had my wires crossed for a few posts which will no be posted to
`talk']
Just recently installed Spamassassin and using it with procmail.
I have a test directory setup to test out procmailr recipes etc and so
far am just trying spamas
[Cross post alert... This should have been posted on `talk'
I had my wires crossed for a few posts which will no be posted to
`talk']
Being very new to spamassassin, I'm wondering if I something setup
very wrong. I just installed from CPAN and so far have only made a
few edits to /etc/mail/spa
41 matches
Mail list logo
