Setup: RedHat 7.3 
       Spamassassin 2.50
       (Running as daemon)

In the many rules that spamassasin parses for each message, are some
of them devoted to identifying a subject line that has too many
non-alphanumic characters? Some kind of percentage deal...

Can someone identify any such rules?  I think I need higher scoring
there.

I get lots of stuff like this past spamassassin:

[...]
 1O. 14-Oct [ 111: "0.5C@VP]OP7~JN" <ad] !oLa9)<SCKOjGi#,Cb7Q;q5C0.5C@V2zF7M<2a!o
 1O. 14-Oct [ 274: webzine             ] [1$0m]A&2H8 0#:4;g @Z0]Au 0x0m...>H3;9...
 1O. 14-Oct [  41: AV?*DD              ] (1$0m)<x0#@G <1EC@L @N;}@; AB?lGQ4Y!!!
 1O. 14-Oct [  46: "@L9Z;g"<bubu@bubusi] ':N:N0! GT22 :80m Aq1b4B 193; CVCJ <:@N;g@LF.'
 1O. 14-Oct [  49: "@LAn8>"<star1063@ly] [1$0m]<v@T@/>F?kG0, @O:;<v@T18A& AA@:>F0!?J 
180fGO<<?d!
 1   31-Oct [  87: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] VP9zWn4s5DMxBgSNO7Mf<RLl5X
[...]

Seems like SA should be able to notice the off beat subject lines
more forcefully.






-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm 
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to