Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> describe FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD   Forged yahoo.com 'Received:' header found
>> 
>> Comes no nearer to making it clear what is really happening.
>
> Hrm.  This was reported once before, and I thought the description had 
> been updated then.  Sorry, I should have checked.

It may be changed, I'm not running cvs.  And I appreciated your explanation.

>> > And please excuse me for saying so, but 2.0 is a ridiculously low spam
>> > threshold.  I'd lose half my email if I were to set it below 4.0.
>> 
>> I tried a defaut setup first though and lots of stuff was coming thru
>> that shouldn't.
>
> I found that the default setup caught nearly all the "generic" spam but
> almost none of the "targeted" spam.  That is, my home domain (I'm sending
> this message from work) is "brasslantern.com" which hosts the web site for
> a bed and breakfast run by my mother.  So I get a lot of tourist-industry
> spam and a lot of spam from Asian companies trying to sell me camping
> equipment (the "lantern" part) or brass trinkets.  I had to put in custom
> rules for all of that.

Probably should go back to default, and see what I observe.  The
first time around a message with  FREE FREE in the subject and
several times in the body came thru, it  may have been a fluke.

Someone here suggested maybe it was just to short to get a good run
at.  It was very short.  But there were others too, now lost to
memory.

One nifty thing is that it is pretty painless to switch back to
default by a simple renaming of /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.

It would probably be more helpfull all around to run in default and
try to helpout with catching more of the crud.

_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to