Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> Not sure what's going on though. I just switched to Digest mode. The > devel group did not have a problem (that I know of, and the digest got > through). > > Here's what's in my user_prefs: > > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Seems like these ought to cover all basis, though I don't know what the > relative SA logic is. > > I did notice this header in the talk digest: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Which contains 'request', so this 'from' address is not white listed. > Though shouldn't the whitelist_to have been enough to allow it > through?. I'll add it to my white lists nonetheless. Though it seems > like what I already had should have been enough - when I switched to > digest mode, I didn't notice anything to indicate a change was > neccessary. Maybe a little different approach wouldn't require as much huffing and puffing: header Spama X-BeenThere =~ spamassassin-.*@lists score Spama -100 So to get to spam status the score must go over +100. I haven't tested this much yet. Only started it when I say this thread. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
