Re: [SAtalk] unix dgram message

2003-12-17 Thread Duncan Findlay
lly a problem on Solaris, or is it pretty > much a non-issue? This has also been reported on Debian GNU/Linux http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2838 -- Duncan Findlay signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [SAtalk] Scores for OSIRU Tests

2003-08-28 Thread Duncan Findlay
lp they gave us in the past and > not useless (mis-)use a service they do not provide anymore. Setting the scores to 0, and commenting out the tests has the same effect. Tests are not run unless the scores are set to something other than 0. -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin, Debian and me

2003-06-20 Thread Duncan Findlay
re. :-( Have a great summer. -- Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU

2003-06-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
take it to slashdot. (And Linksys is agreeing to release the code, according to /.) -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: SA in Mailshield by Lyris / (was) Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU

2003-06-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
is to ascertain that MailShield is following the license. > There is also the possibility, as one person posted, that the SA > Copyright holder or holders have worked a deal with Lyris. If this > is the case they should make this deal known to the SA community > IMO. That has not hap

Re: [SAtalk] A few question regarding Bayes and mail headers

2003-06-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
n to ignore headers you don't want to be considered by bayes. There are a bunch ignored by default too. -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU

2003-06-11 Thread Duncan Findlay
I think you'd have to agree to a new license, or the author would have to remove your code. -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU

2003-06-11 Thread Duncan Findlay
tity owns the copyright to all the code; this did not happen, and as far as I can see, this will not happen anytime soon. -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] X-SA-Relays-Trusted

2003-06-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
but "No matches found for > X-SA-Relays-Trusted" and "No matches found for Relays-Trusted" BTW, it no longer exists :-) but you can get the same with: add_headers all Relays-Trusted _RELAYSTRUSTED_ -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] Restarting sa

2003-06-04 Thread Duncan Findlay
rom a tarball or from CPAN, chances are you can just kill it and start it again. If you installed the Debian package, /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart should do the trick. -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[SAtalk] my procmailrc (with sa-learning of FPs and FNs)

2003-06-01 Thread Duncan Findlay
# Call spamc :0fw | spamc # Spamc failed? (perhaps not installed (while upgrading)) :0e spamc-failure/ } # Get rid of spam :0 * ^X-Spam-Status:.Yes spam/ # Continue filing mail as appropriate -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

2003-05-31 Thread Duncan Findlay
t; and not to > "spamassassin-talk" > > I guess I don't understand why the return-path is set so, but can live with > it You're not supposed to Reply to the Return-path! (Any mailer that does this is clearly broken.) -- Duncan Findlay pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] 2.50 change: sa-learn scripts renamed

2003-02-18 Thread Duncan Findlay
hing to do with restarting on upgrades or something. It'll work fine if you make it Depends: debconf. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf __

Re: [SAtalk] mail with ONLY html

2003-01-14 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:07:16PM -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote: > Hi, > > Can you name me one legitimate email client that sends HTML 'ONLY' emails? Some newsletters are sent in HTML only. -- Duncan Findlay --- T

[SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] Goodbye

2003-01-07 Thread Duncan Findlay
the code works - the only things left > to do are integrate it back into spamassassin and spamd scripts, and do > lots of cleanup, and re-merge all the rule changes from SA2.x. I really hope we see this; hopefully someone will step up to the plate. I was looking forward to SA3. -- Dunc

Re: [SAtalk] Deersoft acquisition

2003-01-06 Thread Duncan Findlay
t even have to get my > thesaurus out for that one! :-) Well they own the trademark for SpamAssassin, don't they? It's not like they're coming up with an exceedingly close name because they can't call it SpamAssassin. -- Duncan Findlay --

Re: [SAtalk] Markup Removal in Mutt

2003-01-03 Thread Duncan Findlay
t; Has anyone figured out a macro to do this? My requirements are: > > - It MUST at most take a single keystroke (at most? what's the least) I don't have this set up to take one key stroke, but I'm sure a macro could do it. -- Duncan Findlay --

Re: [SAtalk] RE: Stop Checking When Score Reached

2002-12-31 Thread Duncan Findlay
me way as spamassassin cvs, the module is spamassassin3. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 not working

2002-12-29 Thread Duncan Findlay
There are 2 possibilities: 1. You don't have razor installed in a place that perl knows about. 2. You selected no when Makefile.PL asked if you wanted to run network tests. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email i

Re: [SAtalk] X-Rot version

2002-12-24 Thread Duncan Findlay
blacklisted? Looks like it's just used to make your e-mail unique. So it probably is entirely not legitimate. -- Duncan Findlay msg11436/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] false positive - please add to "nonspam" corpus

2002-12-20 Thread Duncan Findlay
sed fairly successfully with SpamAssassin 2.43. No help to you woody users though :-( -- Duncan Findlay --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: The Best Geek Holiday Gifts! Time is running out! Thinkgeek.com has the coolest gifts for yo

Re: [SAtalk] Problem with all_spam_to

2002-12-20 Thread Duncan Findlay
anyone can suggest others added by other MTAs, it'd be much appreciated. I get Envelope-to: daf-rogers@localhost (which is what exim delivers to). It's not [EMAIL PROTECTED], like it ought to be, but it might be worth adding. -- Duncan Findlay ---

Re: [SAtalk] CPAN

2002-12-19 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:56:07AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: > Is 2.50 in CPAN? 2.50 is not yet released. -- Duncan Findlay --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating? Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holid

Re: [SAtalk] Installation Problem

2002-12-18 Thread Duncan Findlay
ile /var/run/spamd.pid --name spamd --oknodo --startas /usr/sbin/spamd -- --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid Find that line and see if it's different in some way. -- Duncan Findlay --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek

[SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] rule freeze?

2002-12-18 Thread Duncan Findlay
ll bugs in the "Rules" component are dealt with, or have target = 3.0. (Hint: feel free to go through these bugs and re-assign to the proper component.) I've been closing bugs as soon as they are added to CVS testing; this allows bugs rules to be an indication of

Re: [SAtalk] Installation Problem

2002-12-17 Thread Duncan Findlay
in case you can see something that I do not. > > *** > more /etc/default/spamassassin > # /etc/default/spamd.conf > # Duncan Findlay > # November 2001 > > # WARNING read README.spamd before using. TH

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn-spam is missing CPAN says complete

2002-12-16 Thread Duncan Findlay
you update regularly and check your spam folder frequently. 2.50 will contain the learner component, and should hopefully be released soon. (i.e. early-mid January 2003, hopefully, maybe sooner, who knows?) -- Duncan Findlay msg11208/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] Ok, whitelist working after restarting spamd BUT..

2002-12-16 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 02:39:09PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > > I feel like I'm repeating my self now. > > Sorry...maybe this should be in the FAQ. > > > There's a bug in spamd in 2.43 that occurrs when

Re: [SAtalk] What if a Spammer uses my email address in the From?

2002-12-16 Thread Duncan Findlay
" gets. Has anyone else solved this problem > already? Bumping up FROM_SAME_AS_TO is likely to give you more false positives. > Thank you, > -- > Jonathan Duncan > nacnud.com administrator > Nacnud, Inc. Hehe my nickname was once Nacnud. :-) -- Duncan Findlay -

Re: [SAtalk] problem with spamd and attachments?

2002-12-16 Thread Duncan Findlay
It is fixed in CVS, and there is a patch available somewhere. (Check bugzilla?) -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High

Re: [SAtalk] Ok, whitelist working after restarting spamd BUT..

2002-12-16 Thread Duncan Findlay
repeating my self now. There's a bug in spamd in 2.43 that occurrs when spamc -c is used. You can find a patch in the bugzilla, somewhere, or in the CVS logs. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes

Re: [SAtalk] GENUINE_EBAY_RCVD

2002-12-16 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 08:16:58PM +0100, Klaus Heinz wrote: > Put it into some file in your site configuration (eg local.cf). SA 2.43 > has a bug (fixed in 2.50 as far as I know) which prevents 'header' rules > in your user preferences from working. Not fixed AFAIK.

Re: [SAtalk] how do i turn off the automatic replies to spam

2002-12-15 Thread Duncan Findlay
ouldn't be delivered. But I don't want Spamassassin to send mails. Stop sending spam, perhaps? -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN'

Re: [SAtalk] CONFUSED: spamd, spamproxyd, smtp relay?

2002-12-13 Thread Duncan Findlay
releases of SA. Spamproxyd is no longer supported/included because it was effectively unmaintained. Spamproxyd might have done what you wanted, but I don't know for sure. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Grea

Re: [SAtalk] Anti-spam-assassination?

2002-12-13 Thread Duncan Findlay
> > Correction. Not "someone could", "people do". It happens. A lot Especially porn lists. Just think how surprised your "friend" will be when he opens up his inbox to find farm animals :-) -- Duncan Findlay ---

Re: [SAtalk] OT: Reply-To headers (was: No tag?)

2002-12-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
to go, if they want them to go somewhere other than > "From". Fair enough, I guess. On the Debian lists, Mail-Followup-To is the header everyone lives by. (Probably because we all use mutt) I haven't figured out how to set my reply-to, so I'll just keep reading the same thin

Re: [SAtalk] Re: OT: No tag? (was: sql support)

2002-12-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
t's why I'm not in my Reply-To or Mail-Followup-To: header. Yet, strangely enough, I do get CC'd most of the time. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use

Re: [SAtalk] Restoring user_prefs functionality to spamd

2002-12-11 Thread Duncan Findlay
curity hole. I've thought about this, and it seems like it _might_ be acceptable under certain circumstances. The perlre manpage (in perl 5.8) gives conditions where /(?{ system ("do what I want") })/ would not work, but I think we need to loo

Re: [SAtalk] Anti-spam-assassination?

2002-12-11 Thread Duncan Findlay
don't need to. One of SpamAssassin's strengths is that it uses Razor and dcc and network tests, etc. Plus even if spammers hit no body tests, we will generally hit a lot of headers that are harder to edit. Plus, it's nice to see SA and "widely used" in the same sentence

Re: [SAtalk] white and blacklist .cf files

2002-12-11 Thread Duncan Findlay
rom is supposed to work? Did you restart spamd? Does it work with spamassassin? -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at

Re: [SAtalk] web interface?

2002-12-11 Thread Duncan Findlay
's possible, I think, but _how_ depends on many factors. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Co

Re: [SAtalk] Synchronization of Rules

2002-12-10 Thread Duncan Findlay
27;t running Debian, why not? :-) -- Duncan Findlay msg11015/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] A Taste of their own....

2002-12-10 Thread Duncan Findlay
purposes, the "anti-spammers" in question are > still costing someone else money, instead of paying for the items and the > shipment of those items, themselves. Thus, the irony of it all :-) -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net

Re: [SAtalk] 2.43 - too many false negatives

2002-12-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
all registered to Daily Promotions. (It's a shame a WHOIS > lookup would be expensive, or this would make an excellent eval test.) > > From: MyChoice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Keep your partner coming back for more. Would a "domain contains many n

Re: [SAtalk] Content Length Mismatch

2002-12-02 Thread Duncan Findlay
moke detectors go off to often, you take the battery out rather than stopping the smoke! -- Duncan Findlay msg10778/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] Gosh!

2002-11-30 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 09:34:54PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote: > Not even sure where to begin with this one... You've got old config files being found by SA. Make sure you clean out old files from the various places SA looks. -- Duncan

Re: [SAtalk] Blacklisting / Re: Feature request (maybe)

2002-11-30 Thread Duncan Findlay
l.unexpected.tld > > score TOM_IRREGULAR_TO2 2.00 > > What does the terminal "i" after the second lash in the header rule do? Makes it case Insensitive. -- Duncan Findlay --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the n

Re: [SAtalk] Is to identify yourself by return email necessary in the future?

2002-11-21 Thread Duncan Findlay
a message looks like spam first, that's unacceptable. Which reminds me. Tom Allison, I responded to a message of yours recently, but it bounced because my reverse DNS is broken right now. Your loss, not mine. -- Duncan Findlay ---

Re: [SAtalk] How to use spamassassin headers in emacs rmail

2002-11-18 Thread Duncan Findlay
more likely to be false positives. I might also be able to adjust my > discard-without-looking threshold. You can set subject_tag to contian "_HITS_" which translates into the score (with a leading zero if necessary) for easy

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r is slow

2002-11-17 Thread Duncan Findlay
use it, I have to wait a few seconds for it to finish. Make the macro do spamassassin -r & This way you wont have to wait... just be careful not to do it with too many messages at a time. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsor

Re: [SAtalk] Memory usage

2002-11-17 Thread Duncan Findlay
tion. You may need to upgrade to CVS for this to work well. I use -m 5, and I still have (much smaller) problems because of exim/procmail using lots of memory waiting. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics

[SAtalk] Debian packages for SpamAssassin CVS

2002-11-10 Thread Duncan Findlay
ted directly to me, if it's a Debian packaging related problem. Otherwise, they should be reported at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org -- Duncan Findlay msg10084/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] Genealogy

2002-10-30 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:47:04AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Last I heard, Genealogy was the 2nd or 3rd biggest internet activity, Behind what? Porn and spam? -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence

Re: [SAtalk] You have a secret admirer

2002-10-30 Thread Duncan Findlay
er personally > identifiable information" for unregistered users, since all the info > they have on them is their email addresses? Lawyers? -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technol

Re: [SAtalk] You have a secret admirer

2002-10-30 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:43:55PM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 7:55 PM -0500 Duncan Findlay > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd say most lists about free software are open like that. It's really > > a whole community thin

Re: [SAtalk] You have a secret admirer

2002-10-30 Thread Duncan Findlay
e software are open like that. It's really a whole community thing. Many people like to browse the web archives and post only occasionally. Why shouldn't that be allowed? -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Inf

Re: [SAtalk] spamd and virtual users

2002-10-28 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:48:51PM -0800, Chris Petersen wrote: > why not just let spamc handle more of the normal spamassassin commands, > anyway? The purpose of spamc is to be as lightweight as possible. Ideally spamc will not contain any features that aren't useful by most people.

Re: [SAtalk] A Bunch of Dumb questions

2002-10-22 Thread Duncan Findlay
using spamd. You can't put new rules in user_prefs with spamd. Put them in your local.cf. It looks bad, but it's perfectly safe to ignore. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) tec

Re: [SAtalk] AWL problem ...

2002-10-22 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:58:31PM -0700, joe wrote: > On October 22, 2002 06:26 pm, Duncan Findlay wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote: > > > But it does exactlly the opposite: AWL gives -5.0 points, so it is > > > no longer recogni

Re: [SAtalk] AWL problem ...

2002-10-22 Thread Duncan Findlay
t change was reverted. An upgrade to 2.43 will fix your problem. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.dou

Re: [SAtalk] Sitewide use of spamassassin

2002-10-19 Thread Duncan Findlay
o tweak scores and add stuff to the whitelist, manually. After that, all you need to do is check for false positives (this may be left to the user) > 5. What MTA do you recommend? Whatever you are currently using (assuming that isn't somet

Re: spamd -m safety? (WAS Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.43 released)

2002-10-19 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:16:56PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote: > > Duncan Findlay said: > > > > Where can I get more informaiton on that? I *really* need "-m" to > > > work. It semed to have been reliably on Linux w/Perl 5.6.1. > > > > &

Re: spamd -m safety? (WAS Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.43 released)

2002-10-18 Thread Duncan Findlay
ux w/Perl 5.6.1. > > If "-m" is hopelessly broken, does anyone have alternatives? > > Note, I'm on sa-talk but not sa-devel. Is that a better place to > discuss this? It's sketchy. Try it. If you have problems with it, disable it. Also, read up at http://bugzil

Re: [SAtalk] Re: SA 2.43-1woody

2002-10-17 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:23:58AM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:21:49 -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > What *I* did is simply commenting out the above statement. It's all working > nicely now. :-) I'm looking for a slightly more elegant way of fixing

[SAtalk] Re: SA 2.43-1woody

2002-10-16 Thread Duncan Findlay
debian/spamassassin/usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1'; # substituted at 'make' > time > > Oct 16 13:42:20 Server automount[13741]: >> mount: special device > /export/home/duncf does not exist > Eww... that is ugly. I

Re: [SAtalk] Get SpamAssassin for your Woody!

2002-10-15 Thread Duncan Findlay
Packages for spamassassin-2.43 are available now. The libnet-smtp-server-perl package can be downloaded from the same place. Follow the instructions below. On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:41:42PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > Spamassassin 2.42 packages for Debian GNU/Linux "woody" are

Re: [SAtalk] Deferred connection using Sendmail on 8.0

2002-10-09 Thread Duncan Findlay
thread elsewhere. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://list

Re: [SAtalk] Get SpamAssassin for your Woody!

2002-10-08 Thread Duncan Findlay
ng" version of that package without any > problems. This is what I'm doing. Sorry. That's correct. Next time I update the archive, I'll add libnet-smtp-server-perl. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsore

[SAtalk] Get SpamAssassin for your Woody!

2002-10-07 Thread Duncan Findlay
ot aware of. It uses the same source as the packages for unstable, with a change in the version. These are NOT official Debian packages. They will NOT be subject to the same standards you expect from Debian, i.e. security updates, etc. I'm just providing these because I've been aske

Re: [SAtalk] ok_locales question

2002-10-06 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:51:51AM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think the following is correct: > > > > ok_locales en # Disable all of ja, ko, ru, th, zh > > ok_locales all# Allow all of ja,

Re: [SAtalk] ok_locales question

2002-10-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
is not listed in the manpage? (not to enable anything, but > to turn off the default "all") You could replace en with fr or de or zz or xx or whatever else you want. If ok_locales isn't all, it's none, plus those listed. -- Duncan Findlay -

Re: [SAtalk] ok_locales question

2002-10-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
f ja, ko, ru, th, zh ok_locales all# Allow all of ja, ko, ru, th, zh ok_locales ja ko # Allow standard english locales, disable ru, th, zh -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:Thin

Re: [SAtalk] ok_locales question

2002-10-05 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 07:31:36AM -0700, Andrew Burgess wrote: > Michael Moncur wrote: > > > > The ok_locales setting is "all" by default. > ok_languages en Ummm... way to answer the question! -- Duncan Findlay

Re: [SAtalk] Running SpamAssassin on MailMan archives.

2002-10-04 Thread Duncan Findlay
ed the whole thing as spam; it was after all designed to work on a > per-message basis. > > I guess I'm just wondering if there's any easy way to do this, or if I > should be the developer of a Perl script to handle this sort of thing. formail -s spamc out might work. formai

Re: [SAtalk] SourceForge reminder scores 8.0 with SA 2.41

2002-10-02 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 03:27:14PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I got serveral SF reminders that all scored 8.0. One is attached. Yeah, me too. This might be a good place for a specific default whitelist entry? -- Duncan Findlay --- T

Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs ignored

2002-09-24 Thread Duncan Findlay
nce is IIRC, spamassassin uses the $HOME env variable to determine the location of the user_prefs, which procmail most likely leaves. Spamc does not pass the $HOME variable to spamd, and spamd is forced to take the default for the user spamc is runnin

Re: [SAtalk] (No Subject) is there a user-admin for SA with postfix

2002-09-17 Thread Duncan Findlay
nd in such a manner every time someone posts to the list, not to mention it being a waste of bandwidth and everyone's time. You really don't want 200 messages all saying "I'm sure it could be done, but I don't know how" -- Duncan Findlay

Re: [SAtalk] 64.216.0.0/14 (Listed)

2002-06-27 Thread Duncan Findlay
the IP coordinator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> bounces. In addition, the netblock is a known source of spam. (Sure, its a big netblock, and likely little spam, but it's still a justification.) If you don't like it, you won't like virtually all the RBLs. Run local tes

Re: [SAtalk] Re: 64.216.0.0/14 (Listed)

2002-06-27 Thread Duncan Findlay
ld easily convert you pre-scanned messages (which > would have the various RBL tests) into this format and send them in. You _could_ but it would be useless, since the whole purpose of the GA is to use the current rules, rather than the rules when you recieved the m

Re: [SAtalk] how does one accomplish prefix=dir

2002-06-26 Thread Duncan Findlay
ng is that Makefile.PL and make can both take arguments, but not all arguments. Right now, spamassassin is built for Debian using the following: perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor make install PREFIX="..." LOCAL_RULES_DIR="..." DEF_RULES_DIR="..." -- Duncan Findlay msg06762/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [SAtalk] FreeBSD Install Problem

2002-06-26 Thread Duncan Findlay
ld: cannot find -liconv > *** Error code 1 > > Any idea what could be wrong? You need to insall libiconv. Spamc is compiled in C, and as a result needs to be linked with a few libraries. -- Duncan Findlay --- This sf.net email is sponsor

Re: [SAtalk] Tagging things twice

2002-06-24 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 08:18:10PM -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote: > Anybody seen this happen before? Somehow, you've got spamassassin invoked twice on its way through your mail stream. -- Duncan Findlay --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek

Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_EBAY_RCVD is definitely messed up now

2002-06-24 Thread Duncan Findlay
I just commented out the whole caching bit and everything is fine. -- Duncan Findlay --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [E

Re: [SAtalk] spamd woes (was: spamd ignoring local.cf)

2002-06-24 Thread Duncan Findlay
t > exist in my server-wide configuration are /usr/share/spamassassin and > /etc/mail/spamassassin. I hate to ask the obvious, but "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" _IS_ in the To: or Cc: fields? all_spam_to doesn't work (at all) with forget to and cc headers. -- Duncan Findlay --

Re: [SAtalk] Spelling error....

2002-06-21 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:30:21PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Just upgraded to 2.31, and noticed the following typo in the first > Assassinated spam: > > SPAM: URGENT_BIZ (2.7 points) BODY: Containts 'URGENT BUSINESS' Fixed 2 instances of thi

Re: [SAtalk] Razor Reporting in SA

2002-06-21 Thread Duncan Findlay
port -- hope it works! > That's a bug in the changelog. Razor2 support was added to the main branch of CVS between when 2.30 and 2.31 was released. However, it was not added to the 2.30 branch. Unfortuanetly, due to a bug in cvs2cl, it was added into the changelog, but was not actua

Re: [SAtalk] anyone seen cloudmark.com?

2002-06-21 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 12:55:27AM -0400, Bryan Hoover wrote: > Duncan Findlay wrote: > > > Yep, it's razor. Vipul is the other (or another) co-founder. > > I read the article at coudmark. I never really considered the lawsuit > aspect. The Razor voting concept wou

Re: [SAtalk] anyone seen cloudmark.com?

2002-06-20 Thread Duncan Findlay
t; Aside from its being limited to Outhouse, it sounds a lot like Razor to > me, but maybe I don't know enough. Any comments? > Yep, it's razor. Vipul is the other (or another) co-founder. -- Duncan Findlay msg06554/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[SAtalk] Building Debian packages from CVS

2002-06-20 Thread Duncan Findlay
d for Debian until version 2.30-2 is approved by the Debian ftpmasters. This is required, since spamassassin and spamc are being split into separate packages. -- Duncan Findlay --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.T

Re: [SAtalk] custom subject rule

2002-06-20 Thread Duncan Findlay
s been seen before? I'm using SA 2.20. > This is by design. It may not be documented very well (if at all), but the subject is prepended to the body so all body tests hit the subject line too. -- Duncan Findlay ---

Re: [SAtalk] Evaluation of 2.30 GA scores

2002-06-15 Thread Duncan Findlay
Or "racers aged 13 & 14 years old" Even "celebrate" counts as a porn word, because it contains celeb. I'd like to see the PORN_* tests disappear in favour of a spamphrases type thing. -- Duncan Findlay ___

Re: [SAtalk] Release 2.30 (Viking dentist ˆ l'orange) announcement

2002-06-14 Thread Duncan Findlay
(Or at least mine didn't. Weird? -- Duncan Findlay ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintp

Re: [SAtalk] Fw: [Razor-users] Announce: Vipul's Razor v2

2002-06-14 Thread Duncan Findlay
es are still included with razor2. -- Duncan Findlay ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.c

Re: [SAtalk] spamd/spamc.c:62: EX__MAX undeclared

2002-06-14 Thread Duncan Findlay
/spamc.c:62: `EX__MAX' undeclared here (not in a function) > *** Error exit code 1 > I think this might be fixed in CVS. Can you check? -- Duncan Findlay ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application De

Re: [SAtalk] Re: freqdiff script

2002-06-13 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:20:48PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote: Content-Description: message body text > Here's the attachment for real this time. > How about adding it to cvs? -- Duncan Findlay ___ Don't miss the

Re: [SAtalk] A couple questions regarding spamassassin

2002-06-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
e of 0. You can check this by adding the -D option to spamassassin. -- Duncan Findlay ___ Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROT

Re: [SAtalk] RE: Broken Bugzilla links? - RE: [SAdev] [Bug 436] Score on spam exceeded maximum and went negative

2002-06-12 Thread Duncan Findlay
bugger. You should be able to narrow down the problem within an hour or so. I know, it's time consuming, but your problem is wierd. -- Duncan Findlay ___ Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://w

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Freeze for 2.30, call for nonspam.log submissions

2002-06-11 Thread Duncan Findlay
't figure out how to add in the accents. And my shift button got stuck when I hit L! -- Duncan Findlay ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.s

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Freeze for 2.30, call for nonspam.log submissions

2002-06-10 Thread Duncan Findlay
a L'orange) would be a pretty good name. -- Duncan Findlay ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink __

Re: [SAtalk] C version

2002-06-10 Thread Duncan Findlay
s effective and I noticed a few more false positives. Can't be > avoided the way -S works, sure. So I usually go with -d -a -c -m 5 and if I > need to cut back further then I add -L (local tests only) and lastly -S > -a and -S don't play particularly well together :-( That

  1   2   3   >