On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:12:26AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote: > Yup...I think I saw it mentioned here, first. > > On one hand, it's great that he's finally getting what's coming to him, > and at least the senders are paying postage on the items being sent. > > On the other hand, it's a shame that the vendors and retailers in question > have to pay, themselves, for having to send these catalogues, info > packets, etc. > > While I agree with what they're doing, I disagree with how they're doing > it. For all intents and purposes, the "anti-spammers" in question are > still costing someone else money, instead of paying for the items and the > shipment of those items, themselves.
Thus, the irony of it all :-) -- Duncan Findlay ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk