On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:12:26AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> Yup...I think I saw it mentioned here, first.
> 
> On one hand, it's great that he's finally getting what's coming to him, 
> and at least the senders are paying postage on the items being sent.
> 
> On the other hand, it's a shame that the vendors and retailers in question 
> have to pay, themselves, for having to send these catalogues, info 
> packets, etc.
> 
> While I agree with what they're doing, I disagree with how they're doing 
> it.  For all intents and purposes, the "anti-spammers" in question are 
> still costing someone else money, instead of paying for the items and the 
> shipment of those items, themselves.

Thus, the irony of it all :-)

-- 
Duncan Findlay


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to