On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:43:55PM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 7:55 PM -0500 Duncan Findlay
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I'd say most lists about free software are open like that. It's really
> > a whole community thing. Many people like to browse the web archives
> > and post only occasionally. Why shouldn't that be allowed?
> 
> I'm on some lists where, to accomplish this, you're supposed to subscribe
> and then change your settings to a kind of "vacation mode" where you don't
> actually receive anything.
> 
> The other objection to a closed list I've seen is that one might post from
> multiple addresses, not just the subscribed one. This should only be a
> problem if your post goes through a server that rewrites From lines. (Most
> good mail clients let you create multiple "personalities" so you can sign
> the From line with the right account.)

That's another point. I send mail to this list as [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but receive it as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mainly to avoid having list mail
(unnecessarily) bog down master.debian.org too). Many of the Debian
lists, I recieve as [EMAIL PROTECTED] so it doesn't go through my ISP's
POP server (avoiding massive fetchmail runs, and overflowing
mailboxes, etc).

It'd be frustrating for me to subscribe my multiple personalities and
switch them to vacation mode. I like the way it is now.

Plus, we're here to provide support. Making the user receive a lot of
e-mail from us before we do anything for them seems kinda ironic.

-- 
Duncan Findlay


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to